Influence of social interaction between rams on their serving capacity

Anthea L. Synnott, W.J. Fulkerson
{"title":"Influence of social interaction between rams on their serving capacity","authors":"Anthea L. Synnott,&nbsp;W.J. Fulkerson","doi":"10.1016/0304-3762(84)90035-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The experiment was designed to test the hypothesis that social interaction between rams influenced their serving capacity and modified their preference for ewes.</p><p>The serving capacity and the preference for particular ewes was recorded on the first and seventh day of joining in 8 rams mated either individually or in pairs to 12 oestrous ewes. The serving capacity (mean number ejaculates/hour) was 50% lower in both dominant and submissive rams when working together compared with single-sire matings. However, when working together, 33% of the available ewes were served by the submissive ram and 12.5% were served by the dominant ram so that, in total, more ewes were served (total mean number ± SE of ewes served/ram when mated either individually or as a pair = 4.50 ± 0.89 and 5.50 ± 0.57, respectively). This resulted from a modification in ewe preference by the submissive ram.</p><p>In the absence of competition, the same ewes were observed to be preferred by most rams. This ewe “attractiveness” was found not to be a permanent characteristic, as the preferred ewes at one oestrus were not necessarily those most preferred at a subsequent oestrus.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100106,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Ethology","volume":"11 3","pages":"Pages 283-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3762(84)90035-X","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/030437628490035X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

The experiment was designed to test the hypothesis that social interaction between rams influenced their serving capacity and modified their preference for ewes.

The serving capacity and the preference for particular ewes was recorded on the first and seventh day of joining in 8 rams mated either individually or in pairs to 12 oestrous ewes. The serving capacity (mean number ejaculates/hour) was 50% lower in both dominant and submissive rams when working together compared with single-sire matings. However, when working together, 33% of the available ewes were served by the submissive ram and 12.5% were served by the dominant ram so that, in total, more ewes were served (total mean number ± SE of ewes served/ram when mated either individually or as a pair = 4.50 ± 0.89 and 5.50 ± 0.57, respectively). This resulted from a modification in ewe preference by the submissive ram.

In the absence of competition, the same ewes were observed to be preferred by most rams. This ewe “attractiveness” was found not to be a permanent characteristic, as the preferred ewes at one oestrus were not necessarily those most preferred at a subsequent oestrus.

公羊社会交往对服务能力的影响
本实验旨在验证公羊之间的社会交往对公羊的服务能力和对母羊偏好的影响。8只公羊分别与12只发情母羊单独或成对交配,分别在加入母羊的第1天和第7天记录了公羊的服务能力和对特定母羊的偏好。与单雄公羊交配相比,优势公羊和服从公羊在一起工作时的服务能力(平均射精数/小时)降低了50%。然而,在一起工作时,33%的可用母羊由服从公羊服务,12.5%由优势公羊服务,因此,总的来说,更多的母羊被服务(单个或一对交配时服务的母羊总数±SE分别= 4.50±0.89和5.50±0.57)。这是由于顺从的公羊改变了母羊的偏好。在没有竞争的情况下,大多数公羊更喜欢同一只母羊。这种母羊的“吸引力”被发现并不是一个永久的特征,因为在一次发情时最受欢迎的母羊不一定是在下一次发情时最受欢迎的母羊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信