Ethical governance of artificial intelligence: An integrated analytical framework

Lan Xue, Zhenjing Pang
{"title":"Ethical governance of artificial intelligence: An integrated analytical framework","authors":"Lan Xue,&nbsp;Zhenjing Pang","doi":"10.1016/j.jdec.2022.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Emerging technologies have faced ethical challenges, and ethical governance has changed over time managing these technologies. The governance paradigm has gradually changed from scientific rationality to social rationality and ultimately to a higher ethical morality. The trend of seeking higher levels of ethics and morality provides a rich theoretical underpinning for the ethical governance of artificial intelligence (AI), which is a complex and comprehensive project that involves problem identification, path selection, and role configuration. Ethical problems in AI can also be identified in technology, value, innovation, and order systems. In the four major systems, the basic patterns of ethical problems can become uncontrolled risks, behavioral disorders, and ethical disorders. When considering the path selection, AI governance strategies such as ethical embedding, assessment, adaptation, and construction should be implemented within the technology life cycle at the stages of research and development, design and manufacturing, experimental promotion, and deployment and application, respectively. Looking at role configuration, multiple actors should assume different roles, including providing ethical factual information, expertise, and analysis, as well as expressing ethical emotions or providing ethical regulation tools under different governance strategies. This study provides a comprehensive discussion regarding the practical applicability of AI ethical governance using the case of autonomous vehicles.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100773,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Digital Economy","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 44-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773067022000048/pdfft?md5=ca8e18be776a96c3a676a05bad810ab3&pid=1-s2.0-S2773067022000048-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Digital Economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773067022000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Emerging technologies have faced ethical challenges, and ethical governance has changed over time managing these technologies. The governance paradigm has gradually changed from scientific rationality to social rationality and ultimately to a higher ethical morality. The trend of seeking higher levels of ethics and morality provides a rich theoretical underpinning for the ethical governance of artificial intelligence (AI), which is a complex and comprehensive project that involves problem identification, path selection, and role configuration. Ethical problems in AI can also be identified in technology, value, innovation, and order systems. In the four major systems, the basic patterns of ethical problems can become uncontrolled risks, behavioral disorders, and ethical disorders. When considering the path selection, AI governance strategies such as ethical embedding, assessment, adaptation, and construction should be implemented within the technology life cycle at the stages of research and development, design and manufacturing, experimental promotion, and deployment and application, respectively. Looking at role configuration, multiple actors should assume different roles, including providing ethical factual information, expertise, and analysis, as well as expressing ethical emotions or providing ethical regulation tools under different governance strategies. This study provides a comprehensive discussion regarding the practical applicability of AI ethical governance using the case of autonomous vehicles.

人工智能的伦理治理:一个集成的分析框架
新兴技术面临着伦理挑战,随着时间的推移,管理这些技术的伦理治理也发生了变化。治理范式逐渐从科学理性转向社会理性,最终走向更高的伦理道德。寻求更高层次伦理道德的趋势为人工智能的伦理治理提供了丰富的理论基础,人工智能是一项涉及问题识别、路径选择和角色配置的复杂综合工程。人工智能的伦理问题也可以在技术、价值、创新和秩序系统中发现。在四大体系中,伦理问题的基本形态可以演变为失控风险、行为障碍和伦理障碍。在路径选择上,应分别在研发、设计制造、实验推广、部署应用等技术生命周期阶段实施伦理嵌入、评估、适应、构建等人工智能治理策略。从角色配置来看,多个参与者应该承担不同的角色,包括提供道德事实信息、专业知识和分析,以及表达道德情感或提供不同治理策略下的道德监管工具。本研究以自动驾驶汽车为例,对人工智能伦理治理的实际适用性进行了全面的讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信