Two Archaeological Copies of Cang Jie Pian and Discussion on the Different Perspectives in Chinese Studies

IF 0.1 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Celine Lai 黎婉欣
{"title":"Two Archaeological Copies of Cang Jie Pian and Discussion on the Different Perspectives in Chinese Studies","authors":"Celine Lai 黎婉欣","doi":"10.1080/02549948.2021.1910148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cang Jie pian was an elementary-education textbook of the Qin and Han periods. Lost for nearly a thousand years, scholars knew it only through quotations in received texts. In 1977, a fragmented copy of Cang Jie pian dated to the early Western Han period was discovered in a noble tomb at Fuyang Shuanggudui. It provided a basic idea of how this ancient textbook was compiled. Recently, another much longer version was added to Peking University’s (Beida) collection of bamboo strips. The traditional Chinese approach to studying this ancient textbook focuses on orthography, word meanings and rhymes, as well as its values in relation to Western Han history and literary culture, whereas the Hanxue Sinological approach aims at discovering how a word and its concept in the excavated texts took root in Chinese culture.","PeriodicalId":41653,"journal":{"name":"Monumenta Serica-Journal of Oriental Studies","volume":"104 1","pages":"117 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monumenta Serica-Journal of Oriental Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02549948.2021.1910148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cang Jie pian was an elementary-education textbook of the Qin and Han periods. Lost for nearly a thousand years, scholars knew it only through quotations in received texts. In 1977, a fragmented copy of Cang Jie pian dated to the early Western Han period was discovered in a noble tomb at Fuyang Shuanggudui. It provided a basic idea of how this ancient textbook was compiled. Recently, another much longer version was added to Peking University’s (Beida) collection of bamboo strips. The traditional Chinese approach to studying this ancient textbook focuses on orthography, word meanings and rhymes, as well as its values in relation to Western Han history and literary culture, whereas the Hanxue Sinological approach aims at discovering how a word and its concept in the excavated texts took root in Chinese culture.
《仓颉片》的两个考古抄本与汉学研究的不同视角探讨
《仓颉》是秦汉时期的基础教育教材。遗失了近千年,学者们只能通过收到的文本中的引文来了解它。1977年,在阜阳双鼓堆的一座贵族墓中发现了西汉早期的《仓颉片》碎片。它提供了一个关于这本古代教科书是如何编纂的基本概念。最近,另一个更长的版本被添加到北京大学(北大)的竹条收藏中。传统的汉学研究方法侧重于正字法、词义和韵脚,以及它与西汉历史和文学文化的关系,而汉学汉学研究方法旨在发现出土文本中的单词及其概念如何在中国文化中扎根。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信