Modeling of Human Intervertebral Disc Annulus Fibrosus with Complex Multi-Fiber Networks

F. Ghezelbash, A. Eskandari, A. Shirazi-Adl, M. Kazempour, J. Tavakoli, M. Baghani, J. Costi
{"title":"Modeling of Human Intervertebral Disc Annulus Fibrosus with Complex Multi-Fiber Networks","authors":"F. Ghezelbash, A. Eskandari, A. Shirazi-Adl, M. Kazempour, J. Tavakoli, M. Baghani, J. Costi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3677348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collagen fibers within the annulus fibrosus (AF) lamellae are unidirectionally aligned with alternating orientations between adjacent layers. AF constitutive models often combine two adjacent lamellae into a single equivalent layer containing two fiber networks with a crisscross pattern. Additionally, AF models overlook the inter-lamellar matrix (ILM) as well as elastic fiber networks in between lamellae. We developed a nonhomogenous micromechanical model as well as two coarser homogenous hyperelastic and microplane models of the human AF, and compared their performances against measurements (tissue level uniaxial and biaxial tests as well as whole disc experiments) and seven published hyperelastic models. The micromechanical model had a realistic non-homogenous distribution of collagen fiber networks within each lamella and elastic fiber network in the ILM. For small matrix linear moduli (<0.2 MPa), the ILM showed substantial anisotropy (>10%) due to the elastic fiber network. However, at moduli >0.2 MPa, the effects of the elastic fiber network on differences in stress-strain responses at different directions disappeared (<10%). Variations in sample geometry and boundary conditions (due to uncertainty) markedly affected stress-strain responses of the tissue in uniaxial and biaxial tests (up to 16 times). In tissue level tests, therefore, simulations should represent testing conditions (e.g., boundary conditions, specimen geometry, preloads) as closely as possible. Stress/strain fields estimated from the single equivalent layer approach (conventional method) yielded different results from those predicted by the anatomically more accurate apparoach (i.e., layerwise). In addition, in a disc under a compressive force (symmetric loading), asymmetric stress-strain distributions were computed when using a layerwise simulation. Although all selected AF models predicted gross compression-displacement responses of the whole disc within the range of measured data, some showed excessively stiff or compliant responses under tissue-level uniaxial/biaxial tests. This study emphasizes, when constructing and validating constitutive models of AF, the importance of the proper simulation of individual lamellae as distinct layers, and testing parameters (sample geometric dimensions/loading/boundary conditions).","PeriodicalId":18268,"journal":{"name":"Materials Engineering eJournal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Engineering eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3677348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Collagen fibers within the annulus fibrosus (AF) lamellae are unidirectionally aligned with alternating orientations between adjacent layers. AF constitutive models often combine two adjacent lamellae into a single equivalent layer containing two fiber networks with a crisscross pattern. Additionally, AF models overlook the inter-lamellar matrix (ILM) as well as elastic fiber networks in between lamellae. We developed a nonhomogenous micromechanical model as well as two coarser homogenous hyperelastic and microplane models of the human AF, and compared their performances against measurements (tissue level uniaxial and biaxial tests as well as whole disc experiments) and seven published hyperelastic models. The micromechanical model had a realistic non-homogenous distribution of collagen fiber networks within each lamella and elastic fiber network in the ILM. For small matrix linear moduli (<0.2 MPa), the ILM showed substantial anisotropy (>10%) due to the elastic fiber network. However, at moduli >0.2 MPa, the effects of the elastic fiber network on differences in stress-strain responses at different directions disappeared (<10%). Variations in sample geometry and boundary conditions (due to uncertainty) markedly affected stress-strain responses of the tissue in uniaxial and biaxial tests (up to 16 times). In tissue level tests, therefore, simulations should represent testing conditions (e.g., boundary conditions, specimen geometry, preloads) as closely as possible. Stress/strain fields estimated from the single equivalent layer approach (conventional method) yielded different results from those predicted by the anatomically more accurate apparoach (i.e., layerwise). In addition, in a disc under a compressive force (symmetric loading), asymmetric stress-strain distributions were computed when using a layerwise simulation. Although all selected AF models predicted gross compression-displacement responses of the whole disc within the range of measured data, some showed excessively stiff or compliant responses under tissue-level uniaxial/biaxial tests. This study emphasizes, when constructing and validating constitutive models of AF, the importance of the proper simulation of individual lamellae as distinct layers, and testing parameters (sample geometric dimensions/loading/boundary conditions).
基于复杂多纤维网络的人椎间盘纤维环建模
纤维环(AF)片层内的胶原纤维单向排列,相邻层间的方向交替排列。AF本构模型通常将两个相邻的片层组合成一个包含两个交叉图案的光纤网络的等效层。此外,AF模型忽略了片层间基质(ILM)以及片层之间的弹性纤维网络。我们建立了一个非均质微力学模型,以及两种较粗糙的均质AF超弹性和微平面模型,并将它们的性能与测量结果(组织水平单轴和双轴测试以及整个椎间盘实验)和七个已发表的超弹性模型进行了比较。微观力学模型具有真实的胶原纤维网络在每个板层内的非均匀分布和ILM中的弹性纤维网络。对于小矩阵线性模量(10%)由于弹性纤维网络。而当模量>0.2 MPa时,弹性纤维网络对不同方向应力应变响应差异的影响消失(<10%)。样品几何形状和边界条件的变化(由于不确定性)显著影响组织在单轴和双轴测试中的应力-应变响应(多达16倍)。因此,在组织水平试验中,模拟应尽可能接近地表示试验条件(例如,边界条件、试样几何形状、预载荷)。从单一等效层方法(传统方法)估计的应力/应变场与解剖学上更精确的方法(即分层)预测的结果不同。此外,在压缩力(对称加载)下的圆盘中,使用分层模拟计算了非对称应力-应变分布。虽然所有选择的AF模型都在测量数据范围内预测了整个椎间盘的总压缩-位移响应,但在组织水平的单轴/双轴测试中,有些模型显示出过度僵硬或柔顺的响应。本研究强调,在构建和验证AF本构模型时,适当模拟单个片层作为不同层的重要性,以及测试参数(样品几何尺寸/负载/边界条件)的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信