Sex difference in the safety and efficacy of bariatric procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.8
Renata Risi, Giovanni Rossini, Rossella Tozzi, Silvia Pieralice, Lavinia Monte, Davide Masi, Lidia Castagneto-Gissey, Ida Francesca Gallo, Lidia Strigari, Giovanni Casella, Vincenzo Bruni, Silvia Manfrini, Lucio Gnessi, Dario Tuccinardi, Mikiko Watanabe
{"title":"Sex difference in the safety and efficacy of bariatric procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Renata Risi, Giovanni Rossini, Rossella Tozzi, Silvia Pieralice, Lavinia Monte, Davide Masi, Lidia Castagneto-Gissey, Ida Francesca Gallo, Lidia Strigari, Giovanni Casella, Vincenzo Bruni, Silvia Manfrini, Lucio Gnessi, Dario Tuccinardi, Mikiko Watanabe","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2022.03.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the prevalence of obesity alarmingly increasing, it is of primary interest to identify those factors predicting the success of anti-obesity therapeutic strategies currently adopted in clinical practice, and in particular, those of bariatric procedures showing the greatest success in terms of weight loss and maintenance in both the short and long term. Given sex-related differences in psychosocial status, hormonal homeostasis, and body fat distribution, it is likely that the response to different weight management strategies differs by sex. The objective was to elucidate the effect of sex on different bariatric procedures' efficacy and safety outcomes. Searches of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were performed, followed by hand-searching of reference lists from all relevant articles. We included all the studies evaluating the effect of bariatric procedures on body mass index loss (BMIL), and/or percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), and/or percentage excess body mass index loss, and/or percentage of responders, and/or short-/long-term complications and co-morbidity resolution, broken down by sex. Twenty-seven studies with a total of 114,919 patients were included. Men were more likely to achieve greater BMIL, consistent with higher male baseline BMI, and women were 2.87 times more likely to be classified as weight responders (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.90-4.34), as well as to perform better in terms of %EWL (95% CI: .13-.54). Upon subgroup analysis based on bariatric procedure, women were more likely to be successful in terms of %EWL upon bioenteric intragastric balloon (BIB) placement (.72, 95% CI: .42-1.02). There was no sex difference regarding investigated co-morbidity resolution (hypertension, diabetes, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome) or occurrence of short-term complications, whereas women were more likely to develop long-term complications, with an odds ratio of 1.97 (95% CI: 1.57-2.49). Sex does not have a clear effect on efficacy outcomes of bariatric procedures. Differentiating by procedure, BIB may be more effective in women, although results are discordant based on the weight loss outcome considered. If the short-term postoperative complication rate is similar across both sexes, long-term complications occur more frequently in women. To clarify the real effect of sex on bariatric procedure-derived health benefits, it is crucial to report sex-stratified results in future studies, as well as evaluate body composition changes that go beyond simple body weight reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":94216,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","volume":"6 1","pages":"983-996"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2022.03.022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the prevalence of obesity alarmingly increasing, it is of primary interest to identify those factors predicting the success of anti-obesity therapeutic strategies currently adopted in clinical practice, and in particular, those of bariatric procedures showing the greatest success in terms of weight loss and maintenance in both the short and long term. Given sex-related differences in psychosocial status, hormonal homeostasis, and body fat distribution, it is likely that the response to different weight management strategies differs by sex. The objective was to elucidate the effect of sex on different bariatric procedures' efficacy and safety outcomes. Searches of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases were performed, followed by hand-searching of reference lists from all relevant articles. We included all the studies evaluating the effect of bariatric procedures on body mass index loss (BMIL), and/or percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), and/or percentage excess body mass index loss, and/or percentage of responders, and/or short-/long-term complications and co-morbidity resolution, broken down by sex. Twenty-seven studies with a total of 114,919 patients were included. Men were more likely to achieve greater BMIL, consistent with higher male baseline BMI, and women were 2.87 times more likely to be classified as weight responders (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.90-4.34), as well as to perform better in terms of %EWL (95% CI: .13-.54). Upon subgroup analysis based on bariatric procedure, women were more likely to be successful in terms of %EWL upon bioenteric intragastric balloon (BIB) placement (.72, 95% CI: .42-1.02). There was no sex difference regarding investigated co-morbidity resolution (hypertension, diabetes, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome) or occurrence of short-term complications, whereas women were more likely to develop long-term complications, with an odds ratio of 1.97 (95% CI: 1.57-2.49). Sex does not have a clear effect on efficacy outcomes of bariatric procedures. Differentiating by procedure, BIB may be more effective in women, although results are discordant based on the weight loss outcome considered. If the short-term postoperative complication rate is similar across both sexes, long-term complications occur more frequently in women. To clarify the real effect of sex on bariatric procedure-derived health benefits, it is crucial to report sex-stratified results in future studies, as well as evaluate body composition changes that go beyond simple body weight reduction.

减肥手术安全性和有效性的性别差异:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
随着肥胖的患病率惊人地增加,确定那些预测目前临床实践中采用的抗肥胖治疗策略成功的因素,特别是那些在短期和长期减肥和维持体重方面表现出最大成功的减肥手术,是人们最感兴趣的。鉴于性别在心理社会状态、激素稳态和体脂分布方面的差异,对不同体重管理策略的反应可能因性别而异。目的是阐明性别对不同减肥手术的疗效和安全性结果的影响。检索PubMed、Cochrane和Embase数据库,然后手工检索所有相关文章的参考文献列表。我们纳入了所有评估减肥手术对体重指数下降(bil)、和/或超重体重下降百分比(%EWL)、和/或超重体重指数下降百分比、和/或应答者百分比、和/或短期/长期并发症和合并症缓解的影响的研究,并按性别进行了分类。27项研究共纳入114919例患者。男性更有可能获得更高的BMI,这与男性更高的基线BMI一致,女性被归类为体重应答者的可能性是男性的2.87倍(95%置信区间[CI]: 1.90-4.34),并且在%EWL方面表现更好(95% CI: 0.13 - 0.54)。在基于减肥手术的亚组分析中,女性更有可能在BIB(生物肠内气囊)放置后成功(EWL %)。72, 95% ci: 0.42 -1.02)。在调查的合并症解决(高血压、糖尿病和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征)或短期并发症的发生方面,没有性别差异,而女性更容易出现长期并发症,优势比为1.97 (95% CI: 1.57-2.49)。性别对减肥手术的效果没有明显的影响。通过手术区分,BIB可能对女性更有效,尽管基于所考虑的减肥结果结果不一致。如果两性术后短期并发症发生率相似,那么女性的长期并发症发生率更高。为了澄清性别对减肥手术带来的健康益处的真正影响,在未来的研究中报告性别分层的结果,以及评估身体成分的变化,这不仅仅是简单的体重减轻,这是至关重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信