Bioanalysis of aminoglycosides using high-performance liquid chromatography

IF 3.4 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
ADMET and DMPK Pub Date : 2022-01-11 DOI:10.5599/admet.1183
S. Amponsah, Joseph A. Boadu, Daniel K. Dwamena, K. F. Opuni
{"title":"Bioanalysis of aminoglycosides using high-performance liquid chromatography","authors":"S. Amponsah, Joseph A. Boadu, Daniel K. Dwamena, K. F. Opuni","doi":"10.5599/admet.1183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aminoglycosides are broad-spectrum antibiotics used in the treatment of gram-negative bacterial infections. Due to their nephrotoxic and ototoxic potential (narrow therapeutic index), the use of aminoglycoside for clinical indications requires monitoring. The objective of this review was to identify relevant literature reporting liquid chromatographic methods for the bioanalysis of aminoglycosides in both preclinical and clinical settings/experiments. Data on liquid chromatographic methods were collected from articles in an online academic database (PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Google Scholar). All 71 articles published from 1977 to 2020 were included in the review. Reversed-phase liquid chromatography was the most used method for the bioanalysis of aminoglycosides. Fluorescence or ultraviolet detection methods were mostly used from 1977 to 2002 (51 articles), while mass spectrometry was predominantly used as a detector from 2003 to 2020 (15 articles). Sixty-seven articles reported calibration ranges, which varied significantly for the various drugs assayed: some in the range of 0.1-0.5 ng/mL and others 1250-200000 ng/mL. Also, 61 articles reported R2 values (0.964-1.0) for almost all analytes under consideration. Sixty-three articles reported percent recoveries mostly between 61.0 % to 114.0 %, with only two articles reporting recoveries of 4.9 % and 36 %. Out of the 71 reviewed articles, 56 reported intermediate precision values ranging between 0.331 % to 19.76 %, which is within the acceptable limit of 20 %. This review will serve as a guide for research and/or routine clinical monitoring of aminoglycosides in biological matrices.","PeriodicalId":7259,"journal":{"name":"ADMET and DMPK","volume":"56 1","pages":"27 - 62"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ADMET and DMPK","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5599/admet.1183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Aminoglycosides are broad-spectrum antibiotics used in the treatment of gram-negative bacterial infections. Due to their nephrotoxic and ototoxic potential (narrow therapeutic index), the use of aminoglycoside for clinical indications requires monitoring. The objective of this review was to identify relevant literature reporting liquid chromatographic methods for the bioanalysis of aminoglycosides in both preclinical and clinical settings/experiments. Data on liquid chromatographic methods were collected from articles in an online academic database (PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, and Google Scholar). All 71 articles published from 1977 to 2020 were included in the review. Reversed-phase liquid chromatography was the most used method for the bioanalysis of aminoglycosides. Fluorescence or ultraviolet detection methods were mostly used from 1977 to 2002 (51 articles), while mass spectrometry was predominantly used as a detector from 2003 to 2020 (15 articles). Sixty-seven articles reported calibration ranges, which varied significantly for the various drugs assayed: some in the range of 0.1-0.5 ng/mL and others 1250-200000 ng/mL. Also, 61 articles reported R2 values (0.964-1.0) for almost all analytes under consideration. Sixty-three articles reported percent recoveries mostly between 61.0 % to 114.0 %, with only two articles reporting recoveries of 4.9 % and 36 %. Out of the 71 reviewed articles, 56 reported intermediate precision values ranging between 0.331 % to 19.76 %, which is within the acceptable limit of 20 %. This review will serve as a guide for research and/or routine clinical monitoring of aminoglycosides in biological matrices.
高效液相色谱法生物分析氨基糖苷
氨基糖苷类是用于治疗革兰氏阴性细菌感染的广谱抗生素。由于其潜在的肾毒性和耳毒性(窄治疗指数),氨基糖苷用于临床适应症需要监测。本综述的目的是确定液相色谱法在临床前和临床环境/实验中用于氨基糖苷生物分析的相关文献。有关液相色谱方法的数据收集自在线学术数据库(PubMed、Science Direct、Scopus和Google Scholar)中的文章。从1977年到2020年发表的所有71篇文章被纳入该综述。反相液相色谱法是氨基糖苷生物分析中最常用的方法。1977 - 2002年主要使用荧光或紫外线检测方法(51篇),2003 - 2020年主要使用质谱检测方法(15篇)。67篇文章报告了校准范围,对于不同的被测药物,校准范围差异很大:一些在0.1-0.5 ng/mL范围内,另一些在1250-200000 ng/mL范围内。此外,61篇文章报告了几乎所有分析物的R2值(0.964-1.0)。63篇文章的回收率在61.0% ~ 114.0%之间,只有2篇文章的回收率分别为4.9%和36%。在回顾的71篇文章中,56篇报告的中间精度值在0.331%到19.76%之间,在20%的可接受限度内。本综述将为生物基质中氨基糖苷类的研究和/或常规临床监测提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ADMET and DMPK
ADMET and DMPK Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: ADMET and DMPK is an open access journal devoted to the rapid dissemination of new and original scientific results in all areas of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, toxicology and pharmacokinetics of drugs. ADMET and DMPK publishes the following types of contributions: - Original research papers - Feature articles - Review articles - Short communications and Notes - Letters to Editors - Book reviews The scope of the Journal involves, but is not limited to, the following areas: - physico-chemical properties of drugs and methods of their determination - drug permeabilities - drug absorption - drug-drug, drug-protein, drug-membrane and drug-DNA interactions - chemical stability and degradations of drugs - instrumental methods in ADMET - drug metablic processes - routes of administration and excretion of drug - pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study - quantitative structure activity/property relationship - ADME/PK modelling - Toxicology screening - Transporter identification and study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信