Characteristics of Repetitive Nerve Stimulation (Rns) and Correlation with Severity and Quality of Life of Myasthenia Gravis Patients

L. Susanti
{"title":"Characteristics of Repetitive Nerve Stimulation (Rns) and Correlation with Severity and Quality of Life of Myasthenia Gravis Patients","authors":"L. Susanti","doi":"10.18535/ijmsci/v9i10.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Myasthenia gravis is a rare autoimmune disease due to neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorders. The diagnosis of myasthenia gravis is based on cardinal clinical symptoms, including fluctuating weakness, worsening with activity, and improving with rest. In addition to clinical signs and antibody tests, other tests that are also crucial for diagnosis are electrodiagnostic examination (EDX) such as repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) and single fibre electromyography (SFEMG). Recent studies have focused on assessing patients' severity and quality of life, essential for determining the prognosis and subsequent treatment plans.\nObjective: To evaluate the characteristic of RNS and its correlation with rigor and quality of life of myasthenia gravis patients.\nMethods: Inclusion criteria: patients diagnosed with myasthenia gravis, aged 18-65 years, willing to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria include a history of neuropathy, motor neuron disease, or myopathy and dropping out of the study. Patient demographic data were collected. The results of the RNS examination were divided into two categories, normal and abnormal.\nMG severity was assessed by the Myasthenia gravis foundation of America (MGFA) classification, and the patient's quality of life was assessed by Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15 (MG-QOL 15).\nResults: Of the 24 samples, 69.1% of RNS were positive. The most sensitive muscle for assessing RNS is the anconeus muscle, followed by the trapezius and nasal. There was no significant relationship between RNS features and severity and the quality of life of myasthenic Gravis patients.\nConclusion: Onconeus muscle is the best location for assessing RNS. Although the number of patients with normal RNS had lower severity and better quality of life, there was no statistically significant relationship. Further studies with larger samples and longer follow-ups are needed.","PeriodicalId":14151,"journal":{"name":"International Journal Of Medical Science And Clinical Invention","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal Of Medical Science And Clinical Invention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18535/ijmsci/v9i10.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Myasthenia gravis is a rare autoimmune disease due to neuromuscular junction (NMJ) disorders. The diagnosis of myasthenia gravis is based on cardinal clinical symptoms, including fluctuating weakness, worsening with activity, and improving with rest. In addition to clinical signs and antibody tests, other tests that are also crucial for diagnosis are electrodiagnostic examination (EDX) such as repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) and single fibre electromyography (SFEMG). Recent studies have focused on assessing patients' severity and quality of life, essential for determining the prognosis and subsequent treatment plans. Objective: To evaluate the characteristic of RNS and its correlation with rigor and quality of life of myasthenia gravis patients. Methods: Inclusion criteria: patients diagnosed with myasthenia gravis, aged 18-65 years, willing to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria include a history of neuropathy, motor neuron disease, or myopathy and dropping out of the study. Patient demographic data were collected. The results of the RNS examination were divided into two categories, normal and abnormal. MG severity was assessed by the Myasthenia gravis foundation of America (MGFA) classification, and the patient's quality of life was assessed by Myasthenia Gravis Quality of Life 15 (MG-QOL 15). Results: Of the 24 samples, 69.1% of RNS were positive. The most sensitive muscle for assessing RNS is the anconeus muscle, followed by the trapezius and nasal. There was no significant relationship between RNS features and severity and the quality of life of myasthenic Gravis patients. Conclusion: Onconeus muscle is the best location for assessing RNS. Although the number of patients with normal RNS had lower severity and better quality of life, there was no statistically significant relationship. Further studies with larger samples and longer follow-ups are needed.
重症肌无力患者重复神经刺激(Rns)的特征及其与严重程度和生活质量的关系
背景:重症肌无力是一种罕见的由神经肌肉连接处(NMJ)疾病引起的自身免疫性疾病。重症肌无力的诊断是基于主要的临床症状,包括波动性无力,活动时加重,休息时改善。除了临床体征和抗体测试外,其他对诊断也至关重要的测试是电诊断检查(EDX),如重复神经刺激(RNS)和单纤维肌电图(SFEMG)。最近的研究集中在评估患者的严重程度和生活质量,这对确定预后和后续治疗计划至关重要。目的:探讨重症肌无力患者的RNS特征及其与严谨性和生活质量的关系。方法:纳入标准:诊断为重症肌无力的患者,年龄18-65岁,愿意参加研究。排除标准包括有神经病变、运动神经元疾病或肌病病史并退出研究。收集患者人口统计数据。RNS检查结果分为正常和异常两类。MG严重程度采用美国重症肌无力基金会(MGFA)分级,患者生活质量采用重症肌无力生活质量15 (MG- qol 15)评分。结果:24份标本中,RNS阳性率为69.1%。评估RNS最敏感的肌肉是anconus肌,其次是斜方肌和鼻肌。重症肌无力患者的RNS特征、严重程度及生活质量无显著相关性。结论:圆锥肌是评价RNS的最佳部位。虽然RNS正常的患者数量严重程度较低,生活质量较好,但没有统计学意义上的相关性。进一步的研究需要更大的样本和更长的随访时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信