Comparison of the prognosis value of CTP - crea, traditional CTP, MELD in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding

Nam Phan Trung, Loc Nguyen Van
{"title":"Comparison of the prognosis value of CTP - crea, traditional CTP, MELD in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding","authors":"Nam Phan Trung, Loc Nguyen Van","doi":"10.34071/jmp.2022.7.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Variceal bleeding is a severe complicaton of portal hypertension due to cirrhosis with high rate of motality. The aims of this study was to compare the accuracy of CTP - crea (creatinine-modified Child Turcotte Pugh score) with traditional CTP and MELD score for predicting in rebleeding and mortality within first five days and 6-week in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding. Methods: Prospective study in 118 cirrhotic patients presenting with acute variceal bleeding were hospitalized and diagnosed by upper GI endoscopy submited to calculate CTP-, CTP - crea I/II- and MELD- score. Exclusion criteria were patients with chronic kidney diseases, hepatocellular carcinoma, severe primary cardiopulmonary failure. Results: The mean age of patients was 53.39 ± 11.97 years, male accounted for 91.0%. The patients with bleeding\nfrom esophageal varices were accounted for 82.2% and from gastric varices for 17.8% of which GOV2, IGV1, GOV1 were 11.9%, 3.4%, 2.5%, respectively. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was presented in 16.7% of patients. The prognostic value of these scores in early rebleeding (first five days) were: CTP - crea I (AUC: 0.788) > CTP - crea II (AUC: 0.771) > MELD (AUC: 0.754) > CTP (AUC: 0.671), in early mortality were: CTP – crea I (AUC: 0.860) > CTP – crea II (AUC: 0.859) > MELD (AUC: 0.849) > CTP (AUC: 0.775). For the 6-week rebleeding, only the CTP - crea I score has prognostic value with AUC = 0.67 (p<0,05), while the 6-week mortality, the prognostic value of CTP - crea I was the best score (AUC: 0.818) > CTP - crea II (AUC: 0.804) > MELD (AUC: 0.772) > CTP (AUC: 0.745). Conclusions: The CTP - creatinine scores improved the traditional CTP score and was better than the MELD score in predicting the rebleeding and mortality outcomes in patients with acute variceal bleeding. It is possible to routinely apply this score in clinical practice to stratify and predict the outcomes in variceal\nbleeding cirrhotic patients in Vietnam. \nKey words: variceal bleeding, CTP, Creatinine.","PeriodicalId":86274,"journal":{"name":"The South Dakota journal of medicine and pharmacy","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The South Dakota journal of medicine and pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34071/jmp.2022.7.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Variceal bleeding is a severe complicaton of portal hypertension due to cirrhosis with high rate of motality. The aims of this study was to compare the accuracy of CTP - crea (creatinine-modified Child Turcotte Pugh score) with traditional CTP and MELD score for predicting in rebleeding and mortality within first five days and 6-week in cirrhotic patients with acute variceal bleeding. Methods: Prospective study in 118 cirrhotic patients presenting with acute variceal bleeding were hospitalized and diagnosed by upper GI endoscopy submited to calculate CTP-, CTP - crea I/II- and MELD- score. Exclusion criteria were patients with chronic kidney diseases, hepatocellular carcinoma, severe primary cardiopulmonary failure. Results: The mean age of patients was 53.39 ± 11.97 years, male accounted for 91.0%. The patients with bleeding from esophageal varices were accounted for 82.2% and from gastric varices for 17.8% of which GOV2, IGV1, GOV1 were 11.9%, 3.4%, 2.5%, respectively. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was presented in 16.7% of patients. The prognostic value of these scores in early rebleeding (first five days) were: CTP - crea I (AUC: 0.788) > CTP - crea II (AUC: 0.771) > MELD (AUC: 0.754) > CTP (AUC: 0.671), in early mortality were: CTP – crea I (AUC: 0.860) > CTP – crea II (AUC: 0.859) > MELD (AUC: 0.849) > CTP (AUC: 0.775). For the 6-week rebleeding, only the CTP - crea I score has prognostic value with AUC = 0.67 (p<0,05), while the 6-week mortality, the prognostic value of CTP - crea I was the best score (AUC: 0.818) > CTP - crea II (AUC: 0.804) > MELD (AUC: 0.772) > CTP (AUC: 0.745). Conclusions: The CTP - creatinine scores improved the traditional CTP score and was better than the MELD score in predicting the rebleeding and mortality outcomes in patients with acute variceal bleeding. It is possible to routinely apply this score in clinical practice to stratify and predict the outcomes in variceal bleeding cirrhotic patients in Vietnam. Key words: variceal bleeding, CTP, Creatinine.
CTP - crea、传统CTP、MELD对肝硬化急性静脉曲张出血患者预后价值的比较
背景:肝硬化引起的门静脉曲张出血是门静脉高压的严重并发症,死亡率很高。本研究的目的是比较CTP - crea(肌酐修正儿童Turcotte Pugh评分)与传统CTP和MELD评分在预测肝硬化急性静脉曲张出血患者前5天和6周内再出血和死亡率方面的准确性。方法:对118例肝硬化急性静脉曲张出血患者进行前瞻性研究,这些患者住院并通过上消化道内镜诊断,计算CTP-、CTP- crea I/II-和MELD-评分。排除标准为慢性肾脏疾病、肝细胞癌、严重原发性心肺衰竭患者。结果:患者平均年龄53.39±11.97岁,男性占91.0%。食管静脉曲张出血占82.2%,胃静脉曲张出血占17.8%,其中GOV2、IGV1、GOV1分别占11.9%、3.4%、2.5%。16.7%的患者出现急性肾损伤(AKI)。这些评分对早期再出血(前5天)的预后价值为:CTP - crea I (AUC: 0.788) > CTP - crea II (AUC: 0.771) > MELD (AUC: 0.754) > CTP (AUC: 0.671),对早期死亡率的预后价值为:CTP - crea I (AUC: 0.860) > CTP - crea II (AUC: 0.859) > MELD (AUC: 0.849) > CTP (AUC: 0.775)。对于6周再出血,只有CTP - crea I评分具有预后价值,AUC = 0.67 (p CTP - crea II (AUC: 0.804) > MELD (AUC: 0.772) > CTP (AUC: 0.745)。结论:CTP -肌酐评分改善了传统的CTP评分,在预测急性静脉曲张出血患者再出血和死亡率方面优于MELD评分。在越南的临床实践中,常规应用该评分对静脉曲张出血肝硬化患者进行分层和预测预后是可能的。关键词:静脉曲张出血,CTP,肌酐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信