A new method for testing toxicity of drilling fluid; effect on growth of mussels

Tor Strømgren, Lars-Otto Reiersen
{"title":"A new method for testing toxicity of drilling fluid; effect on growth of mussels","authors":"Tor Strømgren,&nbsp;Lars-Otto Reiersen","doi":"10.1016/S0269-8579(88)80016-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Four different oil-based drilling fluids were microencapsulated in a acacia/ gelatine structure. The microcapsules (size 1–10 μm) are dispersed in natural seawater in different concentrations, and fed to mussels in a running seawater system. One water-based drilling fluid was dispersed in seawater without microencapsulation. The growth in length of the exposed mussels was measured every 24 h for five days. Among the oil-based drilling fluids, the EC<sub>50</sub> (5d) varied from &lt; 1 to 66 ppm, and for the water-based drilling fluid EC<sub>50</sub> ≫ 1000 ppm. There is no correlation between toxicity of the drilling fluids and their oil/water ratio, or between toxicity and the total content of aromatics in the base oils. The mussel test shows a markedly lower toxicity threshold than other tests with the same drilling fluids (<em>Balanus</em>-test, Microtox, <em>Skeletonema</em>-test). The results show that ingestion and digestion of the microencapsulated non-water soluble components of the drilling fluids may have a large impact on the overall toxicity, and that realistic estimates of specific toxicity have to include the effect of both particulate and dissolved fractions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100982,"journal":{"name":"Oil and Chemical Pollution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0269-8579(88)80016-9","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oil and Chemical Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269857988800169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Four different oil-based drilling fluids were microencapsulated in a acacia/ gelatine structure. The microcapsules (size 1–10 μm) are dispersed in natural seawater in different concentrations, and fed to mussels in a running seawater system. One water-based drilling fluid was dispersed in seawater without microencapsulation. The growth in length of the exposed mussels was measured every 24 h for five days. Among the oil-based drilling fluids, the EC50 (5d) varied from < 1 to 66 ppm, and for the water-based drilling fluid EC50 ≫ 1000 ppm. There is no correlation between toxicity of the drilling fluids and their oil/water ratio, or between toxicity and the total content of aromatics in the base oils. The mussel test shows a markedly lower toxicity threshold than other tests with the same drilling fluids (Balanus-test, Microtox, Skeletonema-test). The results show that ingestion and digestion of the microencapsulated non-water soluble components of the drilling fluids may have a large impact on the overall toxicity, and that realistic estimates of specific toxicity have to include the effect of both particulate and dissolved fractions.

一种检测钻井液毒性的新方法对贻贝生长的影响
四种不同的油基钻井液被微胶囊化在金合欢/明胶结构中。将粒径为1 ~ 10 μm的微胶囊分散在不同浓度的天然海水中,并在运行的海水系统中喂给贻贝。一种水基钻井液在海水中分散,无微胶囊化。暴露贻贝的长度生长每24 h测量一次,连续5天。在油基钻井液中,EC50 (5d)从<1 ~ 66ppm,对于水基钻井液EC50 ~ 1000ppm。钻井液的毒性与其油水比之间没有相关性,毒性与基础油中芳烃的总含量之间没有相关性。贻贝试验的毒性阈值明显低于使用相同钻井液的其他试验(balanus试验、Microtox试验、skeleton试验)。结果表明,钻井液中微胶囊化的非水溶性成分的摄入和消化可能对总体毒性有很大影响,对特定毒性的实际估计必须包括颗粒和溶解部分的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信