Assessment and Updating of the Fortification Model from 2006

M. Haugen, J. Dierkes, W. Frølich, L. Frøyland, R. Halvorsen, P. Iversen, J. Lyche, M. A. Mansoor, H. Meltzer, B. Skålhegg
{"title":"Assessment and Updating of the Fortification Model from 2006","authors":"M. Haugen, J. Dierkes, W. Frølich, L. Frøyland, R. Halvorsen, P. Iversen, J. Lyche, M. A. Mansoor, H. Meltzer, B. Skålhegg","doi":"10.9734/ejnfs/2021/v13i430405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2006 the, the Panel on Nutrition, Dietetic Products, Novel Food and Allergy in the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) adapted a Danish model for assessing applications concerning food fortification into Norwegian conditions. The fortification model is presently used by the Norwegian Food Safety Authorities as a tool in the management of applications on food fortification. \n  \nThe model from 2006 was based on intake calculations from dietary surveys from 1997-2000. Since then, new national dietary surveys have been published. These are the comprehensive nationwide Norwegian dietary surveys among adults (Norkost 3, 2010-2011), among young children (Småbarnskost, 2007) and infants (Spedkost, 2006-2007). The Norwegian Food Safety Authority has requested VKM to implement the new data into the fortification model from 2006. \n  \nIn the model from 2006 it is assumed that 25% of the energy in the diet can be derived from fortified foods and drinks. Information from the Norwegian Food Safety Authority, including about a pilot study for Norkost 3 suggested that the overall intake of fortified foods and drinks was marginal. From management of applications for fortified foods, the Norwegian Food Safety Authority also experienced that there are few fortified foods on the market in Norway.  The Norwegian Food Safety Authority has therefore requested VKM to evaluate whether the assumption that 25 energy percent (E%) deriving from fortified foods can be reduced to 15 E%, and if such a reduction will have health implications. In addition, the Norwegian Food Safety Authority has asked VKM to perform an evaluation of the safety factors in the model. \n  \nVKM argues that the model for fortification should be based on the dietary intake of vitamins and minerals at the 95th percentile level in various age groups. This is in accordance with risk assessments performed in European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), and will assure that the dietary intake in a majority of the population will be covered, still within a reasonable secure use of dietary exposure calculations. Mean intake of vitamins and minerals from food supplements (among users only) was chosen, in an attempt to reduce the impact of those with a high intake of supplements. The intake at 95th percentile from the diet plus the mean nutrient intake from supplements is deducted from the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for each nutrient in each age group, giving the maximum amount of nutrients that can be “allocated” for food fortification. The maximum amount of a nutrient that can be “allocated” is then distributed over the energy intake at the 95th percentile level. In this manner an estimate is made showing which age group is most likely to have an excessive intake of a certain nutrient.  \n  \nVKM does not have access to any other information about available fortified foods on the Norwegian market than the information given by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority. However, based on this information, VKM considers that it seems reasonable that the energy intake from fortified foods is reduced to 15 E%. In this revised fortification model the assumption from 2006 that 25 E% of the total energy intake will be derived from fortified foods, have therefore been reduced to 15 E%. This adjustment implies that the addition of e.g. vitamin D, vitamin E, thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, folic acid, vitamin B12, vitamin C and calcium per 100 kcal can be increased without risk of exceeding UL. No changes are made for e.g. vitamin A, beta-carotene, magnesium, iron, zinc or copper. A more summary is presented in Table 1 and Appendix 1. \n  \nThe Panel on nutrition, dietetic products, novel food and allergy considers that this model for management of fortification will reduce health risk that could be caused by unauthorised food fortification.","PeriodicalId":11994,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Nutrition & Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/ejnfs/2021/v13i430405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2006 the, the Panel on Nutrition, Dietetic Products, Novel Food and Allergy in the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (VKM) adapted a Danish model for assessing applications concerning food fortification into Norwegian conditions. The fortification model is presently used by the Norwegian Food Safety Authorities as a tool in the management of applications on food fortification.   The model from 2006 was based on intake calculations from dietary surveys from 1997-2000. Since then, new national dietary surveys have been published. These are the comprehensive nationwide Norwegian dietary surveys among adults (Norkost 3, 2010-2011), among young children (Småbarnskost, 2007) and infants (Spedkost, 2006-2007). The Norwegian Food Safety Authority has requested VKM to implement the new data into the fortification model from 2006.   In the model from 2006 it is assumed that 25% of the energy in the diet can be derived from fortified foods and drinks. Information from the Norwegian Food Safety Authority, including about a pilot study for Norkost 3 suggested that the overall intake of fortified foods and drinks was marginal. From management of applications for fortified foods, the Norwegian Food Safety Authority also experienced that there are few fortified foods on the market in Norway.  The Norwegian Food Safety Authority has therefore requested VKM to evaluate whether the assumption that 25 energy percent (E%) deriving from fortified foods can be reduced to 15 E%, and if such a reduction will have health implications. In addition, the Norwegian Food Safety Authority has asked VKM to perform an evaluation of the safety factors in the model.   VKM argues that the model for fortification should be based on the dietary intake of vitamins and minerals at the 95th percentile level in various age groups. This is in accordance with risk assessments performed in European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), and will assure that the dietary intake in a majority of the population will be covered, still within a reasonable secure use of dietary exposure calculations. Mean intake of vitamins and minerals from food supplements (among users only) was chosen, in an attempt to reduce the impact of those with a high intake of supplements. The intake at 95th percentile from the diet plus the mean nutrient intake from supplements is deducted from the tolerable upper intake level (UL) for each nutrient in each age group, giving the maximum amount of nutrients that can be “allocated” for food fortification. The maximum amount of a nutrient that can be “allocated” is then distributed over the energy intake at the 95th percentile level. In this manner an estimate is made showing which age group is most likely to have an excessive intake of a certain nutrient.    VKM does not have access to any other information about available fortified foods on the Norwegian market than the information given by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority. However, based on this information, VKM considers that it seems reasonable that the energy intake from fortified foods is reduced to 15 E%. In this revised fortification model the assumption from 2006 that 25 E% of the total energy intake will be derived from fortified foods, have therefore been reduced to 15 E%. This adjustment implies that the addition of e.g. vitamin D, vitamin E, thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, folic acid, vitamin B12, vitamin C and calcium per 100 kcal can be increased without risk of exceeding UL. No changes are made for e.g. vitamin A, beta-carotene, magnesium, iron, zinc or copper. A more summary is presented in Table 1 and Appendix 1.   The Panel on nutrition, dietetic products, novel food and allergy considers that this model for management of fortification will reduce health risk that could be caused by unauthorised food fortification.
2006年以来强化模式的评估与更新
2006年,挪威食品安全科学委员会(VKM)的营养、饮食产品、新型食品和过敏小组采用了丹麦的模式,以评估挪威食品强化应用的情况。强化模型目前被挪威食品安全当局用作管理食品强化应用的工具。2006年的模型是基于1997-2000年饮食调查的摄入量计算得出的。从那时起,新的国家饮食调查已经公布。这些是挪威全国范围内对成年人(Norkost 3, 2010-2011年)、幼儿(smamatbarnskost, 2007年)和婴儿(Spedkost, 2006-2007年)进行的全面膳食调查。挪威食品安全局已要求VKM从2006年起将新的数据应用到强化模型中。在2006年的模型中,假设饮食中25%的能量可以来自强化食品和饮料。来自挪威食品安全局的信息,包括关于Norkost 3的一项试点研究表明,强化食品和饮料的总体摄入量是微不足道的。从强化食品申请的管理来看,挪威食品安全局也发现,挪威市场上很少有强化食品。因此,挪威食品安全局要求VKM评估是否可以将来自强化食品的25%能量百分比(E%)减少到15%,以及这种减少是否会对健康产生影响。此外,挪威食品安全局已要求VKM对该模型中的安全因素进行评估。VKM认为,强化模式应以不同年龄组维生素和矿物质的膳食摄入量为基础,达到95%的水平。这符合欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)进行的风险评估,并将确保大多数人口的膳食摄入量将被覆盖,仍然在合理安全的膳食暴露计算范围内。选择从食品补充剂中摄取的维生素和矿物质的平均摄入量(仅限使用者),试图减少那些高摄入量补充剂的人的影响。从饮食中摄取的第95百分位加上从补充剂中摄取的平均营养素从每个年龄组中每种营养素的可耐受最高摄入量(UL)中扣除,得出可“分配”用于食品强化的最大营养素量。一种营养素可以“分配”的最大量,然后在能量摄入的第95个百分位数水平上进行分配。通过这种方式,可以估计出哪个年龄组最有可能过量摄入某种营养素。除了挪威食品安全局提供的信息外,VKM无法获得挪威市场上现有强化食品的任何其他信息。然而,基于这些信息,VKM认为从强化食品中摄入的能量减少到15%似乎是合理的。在这个修订后的强化模型中,从2006年开始的总能量摄入的25%将来自强化食品的假设已经减少到15%。这一调整意味着,每100千卡可以增加维生素D、维生素E、硫胺素、核黄素、烟酸、叶酸、维生素B12、维生素C和钙的添加量,而不会有超过UL的风险。维生素A、β -胡萝卜素、镁、铁、锌和铜的含量没有变化。表1和附录1给出了更详细的总结。营养、饮食产品、新型食品和过敏问题小组认为,这种强化管理模式将减少未经批准的食品强化可能造成的健康风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信