Fear of falling is associated with gait parameters during obstacle avoidance with different physical characteristics in older adults

G. V. Magalhães, J. A. Silva, Milena Razuk, Natalia Rinaldi
{"title":"Fear of falling is associated with gait parameters during obstacle avoidance with different physical characteristics in older adults","authors":"G. V. Magalhães, J. A. Silva, Milena Razuk, Natalia Rinaldi","doi":"10.20338/bjmb.v17i4.363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Fear of falling (FOF) is related to worse locomotor performance, is a predictor of decline in functionality, and predisposes falls in older adults. It is necessary to investigate how FOF influences locomotor parameters during walking and in obstacle avoidance in older adults.\nAIM: To investigate the relationship between FOF and the locomotor variables during walking through and obstacle avoidance with different physical characteristics.\nMETHOD: 22 older adults participated in this study and were invited to perform three tasks: 1) Walking Through; 2) Walking with a solid obstacle and 3) Walking with a fragile obstacle.\nRESULTS: Correlations were found between FOF and following variables: 1) Walking Through: step velocity (r=-0.640, p=0.003), width (r=0.641, p=0.003), double support time (r=0.523, p=0.022); 2) Solid obstacle: step velocity (r=-0.666, p=0.002), length (r=-0.758, p<0.001), foot-obstacle horizontal distance (r=-0.479, p=0.038), right stride velocity (r=-0.534, p=0.019), length (r=-0.522, p=0.022), left stride velocity (r=-0.551, p=0.014), left stride duration (r=0.561, p=0.012); 3) Fragilid obstacle: step velocity (r=-0.629, p=0.004), length (r=-0.556, p=0.014), foot-obstacle distance (r=-0.540, p=0.017), obstacle-foot distance (r=-0.492, p=0.032), right stride velocity (r=-0.583, p=0.009), length (r=-0.498, p=0.030), left stride velocity (r=-0.574, p=0.010), length (r=-0.462, p=0.047), width (r=-0.514, p=0.024), right stride duration (r=0.479, p=0.038), left stride duration (r=0.646, p=0.003).\nCONCLUSION: The characteristics of the obstacle did not influence the older adults FOF during walking through and obstacle avoidance. Although they adopt predictive and reactive compensatory adaptations in an attempt to make the task safer, these adaptations actually make the task more dangerous and increase the risk of stumbling and falling.","PeriodicalId":91007,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of motor behavior","volume":"155 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of motor behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20338/bjmb.v17i4.363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fear of falling (FOF) is related to worse locomotor performance, is a predictor of decline in functionality, and predisposes falls in older adults. It is necessary to investigate how FOF influences locomotor parameters during walking and in obstacle avoidance in older adults. AIM: To investigate the relationship between FOF and the locomotor variables during walking through and obstacle avoidance with different physical characteristics. METHOD: 22 older adults participated in this study and were invited to perform three tasks: 1) Walking Through; 2) Walking with a solid obstacle and 3) Walking with a fragile obstacle. RESULTS: Correlations were found between FOF and following variables: 1) Walking Through: step velocity (r=-0.640, p=0.003), width (r=0.641, p=0.003), double support time (r=0.523, p=0.022); 2) Solid obstacle: step velocity (r=-0.666, p=0.002), length (r=-0.758, p<0.001), foot-obstacle horizontal distance (r=-0.479, p=0.038), right stride velocity (r=-0.534, p=0.019), length (r=-0.522, p=0.022), left stride velocity (r=-0.551, p=0.014), left stride duration (r=0.561, p=0.012); 3) Fragilid obstacle: step velocity (r=-0.629, p=0.004), length (r=-0.556, p=0.014), foot-obstacle distance (r=-0.540, p=0.017), obstacle-foot distance (r=-0.492, p=0.032), right stride velocity (r=-0.583, p=0.009), length (r=-0.498, p=0.030), left stride velocity (r=-0.574, p=0.010), length (r=-0.462, p=0.047), width (r=-0.514, p=0.024), right stride duration (r=0.479, p=0.038), left stride duration (r=0.646, p=0.003). CONCLUSION: The characteristics of the obstacle did not influence the older adults FOF during walking through and obstacle avoidance. Although they adopt predictive and reactive compensatory adaptations in an attempt to make the task safer, these adaptations actually make the task more dangerous and increase the risk of stumbling and falling.
不同身体特征的老年人避障时对跌倒的恐惧与步态参数有关
背景:害怕跌倒(FOF)与较差的运动表现有关,是功能下降的预测因子,并且在老年人中容易跌倒。有必要研究FOF如何影响老年人行走和避障时的运动参数。目的:探讨不同身体特征的行走和避障过程中运动变量与FOF的关系。方法:22名老年人参与了这项研究,并被邀请完成三个任务:1)行走;2)行走在坚实的障碍物上3)行走在脆弱的障碍物上结果:FOF与行走速度(r=-0.640, p=0.003)、宽度(r=0.641, p=0.003)、双支撑时间(r=0.523, p=0.022)相关;2)实体障碍:步幅速度(r=-0.666, p=0.002)、长度(r=-0.758, p<0.001)、脚-障碍物水平距离(r=-0.479, p=0.038)、右步幅速度(r=-0.534, p=0.019)、长度(r=-0.522, p=0.022)、左步幅速度(r=-0.551, p=0.014)、左步幅持续时间(r=0.561, p=0.012);3)脆弱障碍:步速(r=-0.629, p=0.004)、长度(r=-0.556, p=0.014)、脚距(r=-0.540, p=0.017)、脚距(r=-0.492, p=0.032)、右步幅速度(r=-0.583, p=0.009)、长度(r=-0.498, p=0.030)、左步幅速度(r=-0.574, p=0.010)、长度(r=-0.462, p=0.047)、宽度(r=-0.514, p=0.024)、右步幅持续时间(r=0.479, p=0.038)、左步幅持续时间(r=0.646, p=0.003)。结论:障碍物特征不影响老年人行走和避障时的FOF。尽管他们采用预测性和反应性补偿适应,试图使任务更安全,但这些适应实际上使任务更危险,增加了绊倒和摔倒的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信