Ciclos de protesta y referéndums por la independencia. Oportunidades cerradas y el camino de la radicalización en Cataluña

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Donatella Della Porta, Francis O’Connor, Martín Portos
{"title":"Ciclos de protesta y referéndums por la independencia. Oportunidades cerradas y el camino de la radicalización en Cataluña","authors":"Donatella Della Porta, Francis O’Connor, Martín Portos","doi":"10.3989/ris.2019.77.4.19.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article seeks to understand the trajectory of radicalization in the Catalan ‘proces’. Regardless of their formal legal standing, referendum campaigns are distinct political opportunities which also generate further opportunities. Contrary to what some theories of protest would predict, when political opportunities are closed down at national level, and repression toughens, violent escalation leading to fragmentation and ultimately demobilization does not necessarily ensue, at least in the short term. As the Catalan ‘proces’ illustrates between the mid-2000s and late-2018, the combination of mechanisms such as appropriation of opportunities, downward scale shift and movement convergence can mitigate escalation processes. A dense network of local and grassroots assemblies displaced the previously dominant, major civil society organizations that led mass protests, especially during the 2012-2015 ‘diadas’. These grassroots actors prioritized the organization of dissent through more direct, more disruptive, but mostly peaceful forms of action. This in turn facilitated movement convergence, based upon solidarization, as it opened up local spaces where the activists from across the spectrum could mobilize together, pre-empting a clear violent escalation and the emergence of violent splinter groups till late 2018.","PeriodicalId":45827,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional De Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional De Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2019.77.4.19.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This article seeks to understand the trajectory of radicalization in the Catalan ‘proces’. Regardless of their formal legal standing, referendum campaigns are distinct political opportunities which also generate further opportunities. Contrary to what some theories of protest would predict, when political opportunities are closed down at national level, and repression toughens, violent escalation leading to fragmentation and ultimately demobilization does not necessarily ensue, at least in the short term. As the Catalan ‘proces’ illustrates between the mid-2000s and late-2018, the combination of mechanisms such as appropriation of opportunities, downward scale shift and movement convergence can mitigate escalation processes. A dense network of local and grassroots assemblies displaced the previously dominant, major civil society organizations that led mass protests, especially during the 2012-2015 ‘diadas’. These grassroots actors prioritized the organization of dissent through more direct, more disruptive, but mostly peaceful forms of action. This in turn facilitated movement convergence, based upon solidarization, as it opened up local spaces where the activists from across the spectrum could mobilize together, pre-empting a clear violent escalation and the emergence of violent splinter groups till late 2018.
抗议和独立公投的循环。加泰罗尼亚封闭的机会和激进主义之路
本文试图理解加泰罗尼亚“进程”中激进化的轨迹。无论其正式法律地位如何,全民投票运动都是独特的政治机会,也会产生更多的机会。与一些抗议理论所预测的相反,当政治机会在国家层面被关闭,镇压加强时,导致分裂和最终遣散的暴力升级不一定会随之而来,至少在短期内是这样。正如加泰罗尼亚在2000年代中期到2018年末之间的“过程”所表明的那样,利用机会、向下规模转移和运动趋同等机制的结合可以缓解升级过程。密集的地方和基层集会网络取代了以前主导大规模抗议活动的主要民间社会组织,特别是在2012-2015年“diadas”期间。这些草根行动者通过更直接,更具破坏性,但大多是和平的行动形式,优先组织异议。这反过来又促进了基于团结的运动趋同,因为它开辟了地方空间,来自各个领域的活动家可以一起动员,在2018年底之前先发制人,防止明显的暴力升级和暴力分裂团体的出现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信