Rational Use of Antibiotics and Monitoring of Drug Interactions in Patients with Respiratory Tract Infection

N. Akbari, Ramakrishna Prudhivi, S. Naidu
{"title":"Rational Use of Antibiotics and Monitoring of Drug Interactions in Patients with Respiratory Tract Infection","authors":"N. Akbari, Ramakrishna Prudhivi, S. Naidu","doi":"10.5530/jppcm.2018.4.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A respiratory tract infection (RTI) is considered as one of the commonest public health problem dealt with in primary care. Objective: To evaluate the prescribing pattern of antibiotics, drug interactions involved and their rationality in the management of respiratory tract infection. Methods: The study was conducted in 180 RTI patients admitted in Sagar Hospital, Bengaluru. The study was a prospective, observational study. The information collected was based on inpatient case record and documented in the predesigned patient profile form. The data was analyzed and assessed using Micromedex 2.0, Medscape and www.drugs.com. Results: A total of 180 patients were included as per inclusion and exclusion criteria, out of which 98(54.4%) were male and the mean (SD) age of the patients was 58(14.3) years. Majority of patients had hypertension 77(26.22%) as co-morbidity followed by diabetes mellitus 64(21.89%). Among 180 cases, 42(23.33%) cases were diagnosed with URTI in which 7(16.66%) patients had sinusitis, 5(11.9%) had tonsillitis, 8(19.04%) had common cold, 2(4.76%) had pharyngitis and 19(45.23%) had unspecified URTI. In study population 134(74.44%) cases were diagnosed with LRTI in which 7(5.22%) were acute bronchitis, 40(29.85%) were bronchitis, 2(1.49%) were broncholithiasis, 29(21.64%) were pneumonia and 56(41.80) were unspecified LRTI. 4(2.23%) cases were diagnosed with both URTI and LRTI. In current study a total of 322 Antibiotics were prescribed among which most commonly used is Piperacillin+ Tazobactam 88(27.32%) followed by Clarithromycin 52(16.14%). The most offending drug in major, moderate and minor drug interactions was clarithromycin 111(79.28%), clarithromycin 65(51.58%) and Piperacillin + Tazobactam 23(56.09%) respectively. Conclusion: This study concluded the prudent use of antibiotics will diminish the burden of multi-drug resistance and thereby providing better patient management. Key words: Respiratory tract infection, Prescribing pattern, Rational use of antibiotics, Drug interactions.","PeriodicalId":16825,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Community Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Community Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jppcm.2018.4.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: A respiratory tract infection (RTI) is considered as one of the commonest public health problem dealt with in primary care. Objective: To evaluate the prescribing pattern of antibiotics, drug interactions involved and their rationality in the management of respiratory tract infection. Methods: The study was conducted in 180 RTI patients admitted in Sagar Hospital, Bengaluru. The study was a prospective, observational study. The information collected was based on inpatient case record and documented in the predesigned patient profile form. The data was analyzed and assessed using Micromedex 2.0, Medscape and www.drugs.com. Results: A total of 180 patients were included as per inclusion and exclusion criteria, out of which 98(54.4%) were male and the mean (SD) age of the patients was 58(14.3) years. Majority of patients had hypertension 77(26.22%) as co-morbidity followed by diabetes mellitus 64(21.89%). Among 180 cases, 42(23.33%) cases were diagnosed with URTI in which 7(16.66%) patients had sinusitis, 5(11.9%) had tonsillitis, 8(19.04%) had common cold, 2(4.76%) had pharyngitis and 19(45.23%) had unspecified URTI. In study population 134(74.44%) cases were diagnosed with LRTI in which 7(5.22%) were acute bronchitis, 40(29.85%) were bronchitis, 2(1.49%) were broncholithiasis, 29(21.64%) were pneumonia and 56(41.80) were unspecified LRTI. 4(2.23%) cases were diagnosed with both URTI and LRTI. In current study a total of 322 Antibiotics were prescribed among which most commonly used is Piperacillin+ Tazobactam 88(27.32%) followed by Clarithromycin 52(16.14%). The most offending drug in major, moderate and minor drug interactions was clarithromycin 111(79.28%), clarithromycin 65(51.58%) and Piperacillin + Tazobactam 23(56.09%) respectively. Conclusion: This study concluded the prudent use of antibiotics will diminish the burden of multi-drug resistance and thereby providing better patient management. Key words: Respiratory tract infection, Prescribing pattern, Rational use of antibiotics, Drug interactions.
呼吸道感染患者合理使用抗生素及药物相互作用监测
背景:呼吸道感染(RTI)被认为是初级保健中最常见的公共卫生问题之一。目的:评价呼吸道感染治疗中抗生素的处方模式、药物相互作用及其合理性。方法:对班加罗尔Sagar医院收治的180例RTI患者进行研究。该研究是一项前瞻性观察性研究。收集的信息基于住院病例记录,并记录在预先设计的患者档案表格中。使用Micromedex 2.0、Medscape和www.drugs.com对数据进行分析和评估。结果:按照纳入和排除标准共纳入180例患者,其中男性98例(54.4%),平均(SD)年龄58(14.3)岁。合并高血压77例(26.22%),其次为糖尿病64例(21.89%)。其中鼻窦炎7例(16.66%),扁桃体炎5例(11.9%),普通感冒8例(19.04%),咽炎2例(4.76%),不明尿道感染19例(45.23%)。研究人群中134例(74.44%)被诊断为下呼吸道感染,其中急性支气管炎7例(5.22%),支气管炎40例(29.85%),细支结石2例(1.49%),肺炎29例(21.64%),不明下呼吸道感染56例(41.80)。4例(2.23%)同时诊断为尿道感染和下呼吸道感染。本研究共使用抗生素322种,其中最常用的是哌拉西林+他唑巴坦88种(27.32%),其次是克拉霉素52种(16.14%)。重度、中度和轻度药物相互作用中最严重的药物分别为克拉霉素111(79.28%)、克拉霉素65(51.58%)和哌西林+他唑巴坦23(56.09%)。结论:谨慎使用抗生素可减轻多重耐药负担,从而为患者提供更好的管理。关键词:呼吸道感染;处方模式;合理使用抗生素;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信