Inter-Laboratory Analysis of Steviol Glycosides by an External Standard Method

J. M. C. Geuns
{"title":"Inter-Laboratory Analysis of Steviol Glycosides by an External Standard Method","authors":"J. M. C. Geuns","doi":"10.11648/J.IJNFS.20180705.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To optimise steviol glycoside analysis, several round-robin tests were organised by the European Stevia Association (EUSTAS). Seventeen laboratories participated in the testing. Only 8 laboratories have sent their results. In the first round-robin testing, 2 samples were analysed. The first sample had a purity of 96.2%. The second sample was a 4/5 dilution with NaHCO 3 of sample 1. This way, the drying process itself could be checked. The purity of sample 2 was 82.35%. The reported purities of sample 1 varied between 79.8 and 96.2%, those of sample 2 varied between 58.1 and 81.8%. The drying of sample 2 showed that weight loss was between 4.9 and 12.7%, demonstrating that not all laboratories dried the sample to a constant weight. In a second round-robin testing, the purity of the sample was 91.1%. The reported purities of the sample varied between 82.74 and 95.86%. About 3% purified RebB was added to the sample to check the quality of the analysis of this compound possessing a carboxylic group. The samples contained the following steviol glycosides: Reb D, Reb E, Reb A, ST, Reb F, Reb C, Dul A, Reb G, Rub, Reb B, SB and SM (1 lab). No SV was detected. The number of SVgly analysed in the different laboratories varied between 4 and 11. One lab only analysed ST and Reb A and gave a percentage composition of these compounds. To improve the accuracy of analysis, different suggestions are made, such as controlling the drying process of samples and standards, purity of standards, injection of sufficient material and use of solvent gradients to shorten the run time and to reduce integration errors. The results of this second round-robin tests are better than those of the first one.","PeriodicalId":14174,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences","volume":"39 1","pages":"173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJNFS.20180705.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

To optimise steviol glycoside analysis, several round-robin tests were organised by the European Stevia Association (EUSTAS). Seventeen laboratories participated in the testing. Only 8 laboratories have sent their results. In the first round-robin testing, 2 samples were analysed. The first sample had a purity of 96.2%. The second sample was a 4/5 dilution with NaHCO 3 of sample 1. This way, the drying process itself could be checked. The purity of sample 2 was 82.35%. The reported purities of sample 1 varied between 79.8 and 96.2%, those of sample 2 varied between 58.1 and 81.8%. The drying of sample 2 showed that weight loss was between 4.9 and 12.7%, demonstrating that not all laboratories dried the sample to a constant weight. In a second round-robin testing, the purity of the sample was 91.1%. The reported purities of the sample varied between 82.74 and 95.86%. About 3% purified RebB was added to the sample to check the quality of the analysis of this compound possessing a carboxylic group. The samples contained the following steviol glycosides: Reb D, Reb E, Reb A, ST, Reb F, Reb C, Dul A, Reb G, Rub, Reb B, SB and SM (1 lab). No SV was detected. The number of SVgly analysed in the different laboratories varied between 4 and 11. One lab only analysed ST and Reb A and gave a percentage composition of these compounds. To improve the accuracy of analysis, different suggestions are made, such as controlling the drying process of samples and standards, purity of standards, injection of sufficient material and use of solvent gradients to shorten the run time and to reduce integration errors. The results of this second round-robin tests are better than those of the first one.
外标法测定甜菊醇苷的实验室间分析
为了优化甜菊醇糖苷分析,欧洲甜菊糖协会(EUSTAS)组织了几次循环试验。17个实验室参与了测试。只有8个实验室提交了他们的结果。在第一轮循环测试中,分析了2个样本。第一个样品的纯度为96.2%。第二个样品用样品1的nahco3稀释4/5。这样,就可以检查干燥过程本身。样品2的纯度为82.35%。样品1的报告纯度在79.8 ~ 96.2%之间,样品2的报告纯度在58.1 ~ 81.8%之间。样品2的干燥表明,重量损失在4.9和12.7%之间,表明并非所有实验室都将样品干燥到恒定重量。第二次循环检测,样品纯度为91.1%。报告样品的纯度在82.74 ~ 95.86%之间。在样品中加入约3%的纯化RebB,以检查该含有羧基的化合物的分析质量。样品中含有甜菊醇苷:Reb D、Reb E、Reb A、ST、Reb F、Reb C、Dul A、Reb G、Rub、Reb B、SB和SM(1个实验室)。日志含义未检测到SV。在不同的实验室中分析的SVgly的数量在4到11之间。一个实验室只分析了ST和Reb A,并给出了这些化合物的组成百分比。为了提高分析的准确性,提出了控制样品和标准品的干燥过程、标准品的纯度、进样量充足、溶剂梯度的使用等建议,以缩短运行时间,减少积分误差。第二次循环测试的结果优于第一次循环测试的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信