EXERCISE TESTING OF PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES: SPECIFIC OR UNIVERSAL?

IF 0.2 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
K. Mekhdieva, A. Zakharova
{"title":"EXERCISE TESTING OF PROFESSIONAL ATHLETES: SPECIFIC OR UNIVERSAL?","authors":"K. Mekhdieva, A. Zakharova","doi":"10.14529/hsm190103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The article deals with comparing the data obtained from exercise load tests by using various ergometers. Materials and methods. Twenty professional athletes (15 triathletes and 5 ski-racers) aged 14–38 participated in the test performed with the help of the cycle ergometer, treadmill, and Thorax Trainer ski machine. The experiment took place at the premises of UrFU sports research laboratory (Yekaterinburg, Russia). Cycle ergometer and treadmill tests were conducted with a maximal RAMP protocol and a system for exercise testing (Schiller). A high-intensity interval test was conducted with the help of Thorax Trainer ski machine. All tests were performed with the analysis of gas exchange and heart rate. Results. It was established that there were no significant differences in the reaction of the cardiorespiratory system to load when comparing the data from cycle ergometer and treadmill tests as well as cycle ergometer and ski machine tests. In particular, we found no significant differences in the values of maximum oxygen consumption, ventilation, maximum HR, HR at aerobic and anaerobic thresholds, and HR during recovery after the test. Conclusion. Cycle ergometer test with a maximal RAMP protocol is the most informative and universal method for the aerobic testing of functional capacity in professional athletes","PeriodicalId":13008,"journal":{"name":"Human Sport Medicine","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Sport Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14529/hsm190103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim. The article deals with comparing the data obtained from exercise load tests by using various ergometers. Materials and methods. Twenty professional athletes (15 triathletes and 5 ski-racers) aged 14–38 participated in the test performed with the help of the cycle ergometer, treadmill, and Thorax Trainer ski machine. The experiment took place at the premises of UrFU sports research laboratory (Yekaterinburg, Russia). Cycle ergometer and treadmill tests were conducted with a maximal RAMP protocol and a system for exercise testing (Schiller). A high-intensity interval test was conducted with the help of Thorax Trainer ski machine. All tests were performed with the analysis of gas exchange and heart rate. Results. It was established that there were no significant differences in the reaction of the cardiorespiratory system to load when comparing the data from cycle ergometer and treadmill tests as well as cycle ergometer and ski machine tests. In particular, we found no significant differences in the values of maximum oxygen consumption, ventilation, maximum HR, HR at aerobic and anaerobic thresholds, and HR during recovery after the test. Conclusion. Cycle ergometer test with a maximal RAMP protocol is the most informative and universal method for the aerobic testing of functional capacity in professional athletes
专业运动员的运动测试:具体的还是普遍的?
的目标。本文讨论了用各种测力仪进行运动负荷试验所得数据的比较。材料和方法。20名年龄在14-38岁之间的专业运动员(15名铁人三项运动员和5名滑雪运动员)在自行车测力仪、跑步机和Thorax Trainer滑雪机的帮助下进行了测试。实验在乌尔夫大学体育研究实验室(叶卡捷琳堡,俄罗斯)进行。使用最大RAMP方案和运动测试系统(Schiller)进行循环测力仪和跑步机测试。在Thorax Trainer滑雪机的帮助下进行了高强度间歇试验。所有试验均通过气体交换和心率分析进行。结果。通过对比自行车测力仪和跑步机试验数据,以及自行车测力仪和滑雪机试验数据,我们发现心肺系统对负荷的反应没有显著差异。特别是,我们发现最大耗氧量,通气量,最大HR,有氧和无氧阈值HR,以及测试后恢复时的HR值没有显著差异。结论。使用最大RAMP协议的循环测力仪测试是专业运动员功能能力有氧测试中信息量最大和最通用的方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Sport Medicine
Human Sport Medicine SPORT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信