Fontes de conhecimentos dos treinadores: estudo de caso das seleções brasileiras masculinas de handebol

IF 0.3 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES
J. Mendes, Michel Milistetd, S. J. Ibáñez, Juarez Vieira do Nascimento
{"title":"Fontes de conhecimentos dos treinadores: estudo de caso das seleções brasileiras masculinas de handebol","authors":"J. Mendes, Michel Milistetd, S. J. Ibáñez, Juarez Vieira do Nascimento","doi":"10.15517/pensarmov.v18i2.41103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the current study is to identify the knowledge sources mostly valued by coaches and assistant coaches of Brazilian male handball teams belonging to the youth (U19), junior (U21) and adult categories. Case study carried out with three coaches and three assistant coaches of Brazilian male handball teams; data were collected through the Coach Training Profile Questionnaire and subjected to descriptive (median) and inferential statistics (U Mann Whitney and Kruskal Wallis tests), at significance level p≤ 0.05.Coaches and assistant coaches of the national handball teams have attributed greater value to knowledge sources such as “professional experience” and “academic training”. In addition, “professional experience” was the knowledge source mostly valued by technical commission members of the U19 and adult categories, whereas members of the technical committee of the U21 category have mostly valued “academic training” as knowledge source. However, no significant differences were observed in results between coaches and assistant coaches, as well as among the technical commissions of the U19, U21 and adult categories. The professional performance of coaches and assistant coaches of Brazilian male handball teams belonging to the U19, U21 and adult categories and the construction of the training process associated with the match model proposed for the teams are structured based on knowledge sources such as “ professional experience ”and“ academic training ”.","PeriodicalId":40746,"journal":{"name":"Pensar en Movimiento-Revista de Ciencias del Ejercicio y la Salud","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pensar en Movimiento-Revista de Ciencias del Ejercicio y la Salud","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15517/pensarmov.v18i2.41103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The aim of the current study is to identify the knowledge sources mostly valued by coaches and assistant coaches of Brazilian male handball teams belonging to the youth (U19), junior (U21) and adult categories. Case study carried out with three coaches and three assistant coaches of Brazilian male handball teams; data were collected through the Coach Training Profile Questionnaire and subjected to descriptive (median) and inferential statistics (U Mann Whitney and Kruskal Wallis tests), at significance level p≤ 0.05.Coaches and assistant coaches of the national handball teams have attributed greater value to knowledge sources such as “professional experience” and “academic training”. In addition, “professional experience” was the knowledge source mostly valued by technical commission members of the U19 and adult categories, whereas members of the technical committee of the U21 category have mostly valued “academic training” as knowledge source. However, no significant differences were observed in results between coaches and assistant coaches, as well as among the technical commissions of the U19, U21 and adult categories. The professional performance of coaches and assistant coaches of Brazilian male handball teams belonging to the U19, U21 and adult categories and the construction of the training process associated with the match model proposed for the teams are structured based on knowledge sources such as “ professional experience ”and“ academic training ”.
教练的知识来源:巴西男子手球队的案例研究
本研究的目的是确定巴西男子手球队的教练和助理教练最重视的知识来源,分别属于青年(U19),青少年(U21)和成人类别。以巴西男子手球队3名教练和3名助理教练为研究对象;数据通过《教练员培训概况问卷》收集,进行描述性统计(中位数)和推论性统计(U Mann Whitney检验和Kruskal Wallis检验),显著性水平p≤0.05。国家手球队的教练和助理教练更看重“专业经验”和“学术训练”等知识来源。此外,U19和成人类技术委员会委员最看重的知识来源是“专业经验”,而U21类技术委员会委员最看重的知识来源是“学术培训”。而教练员与助理教练员之间,U19、U21和成人组技术委员会之间的成绩差异不显著。基于“专业经验”和“学术训练”等知识来源,对巴西U19、U21和成人男子手球队教练员和助理教练员的专业表现以及与为球队提出的比赛模型相关的训练过程构建进行了结构化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信