Égalité professionnelle et genre en contexte : l’exemple des chef.fes d’établissement du secondaire

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
G. Combaz , C. Morin-Messabel
{"title":"Égalité professionnelle et genre en contexte : l’exemple des chef.fes d’établissement du secondaire","authors":"G. Combaz ,&nbsp;C. Morin-Messabel","doi":"10.1016/j.pto.2021.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the public service, the elementary and secondary education sector is highly feminised. Our object of study is related to these issues of professional equality within the national education system (a highly feminised context) and aims to explore the discourse held by management staff (especially women) on the perception (or not) of gender inequalities in access to managerial positions (subjective perception of inequalities). The results make it possible first of all to show the heterogeneity of the responses of staff (including women) on questions of perceived equality. Comparatively, a majority of the interviewees emphasised the difficulties in articulating different life times (professional, family, personal). They also emphasised the availability and commitment required to carry out the function of head teacher. And, in this respect, there seems to be relative agreement between the women and men who responded (although, from a quantitative point of view, more women mentioned these aspects). The fields of application of this research should be linked to equality policies in the public service and action plans for gender equality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43191,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1420253021000066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the public service, the elementary and secondary education sector is highly feminised. Our object of study is related to these issues of professional equality within the national education system (a highly feminised context) and aims to explore the discourse held by management staff (especially women) on the perception (or not) of gender inequalities in access to managerial positions (subjective perception of inequalities). The results make it possible first of all to show the heterogeneity of the responses of staff (including women) on questions of perceived equality. Comparatively, a majority of the interviewees emphasised the difficulties in articulating different life times (professional, family, personal). They also emphasised the availability and commitment required to carry out the function of head teacher. And, in this respect, there seems to be relative agreement between the women and men who responded (although, from a quantitative point of view, more women mentioned these aspects). The fields of application of this research should be linked to equality policies in the public service and action plans for gender equality.

背景下的职业平等和性别:以领导者为例。中等教育机构
在公共服务部门,初等和中等教育部门高度女性化。我们的研究对象与国家教育系统(高度女性化的环境)中的职业平等问题有关,旨在探索管理人员(尤其是女性)对获得管理职位(对不平等的主观感知)中性别不平等的看法(或不平等)。这些结果使我们能够首先显示工作人员(包括妇女)对感知到的平等问题的不同反应。相比之下,大多数受访者强调在不同的生活时间(职业、家庭、个人)中表达困难。他们还强调了履行校长职能所需的可用性和承诺。而且,在这方面,回应的女性和男性之间似乎有相对一致的看法(尽管从数量的角度来看,更多的女性提到了这些方面)。这项研究的应用领域应与公务员制度中的平等政策和两性平等行动计划联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
33.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信