Scaligerana: Language as a Plot

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE
A. Golubkov
{"title":"Scaligerana: Language as a Plot","authors":"A. Golubkov","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-1-110-125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article concentrates on the analysis of Scaligerana, which stood at the origins of the ana tradition, widely represented by works created in the 17th – 19th centuries. The author analyzes the process of creating the text, which is represented by two independent versions (Prima Scaligerana and Secunda Scaligerana), compiled by students and admirers of the philologist Joseph Justus Scaliger, as well as the occuring of the manuscripts, their veneration and the vicissitudes of its publication. The article explores the logic of presenting information about a scholar who appears to the reader as an interlocutor who shares his personal experience and philological research in a private conversation. It demonstrates that the increased interest in the language, etymologies, and interpretations of the “obscurities” is a distinctive feature and the leading plot line of Scaligerana. The article suggests that the reasons for the close attention to language are to be sought in the European linguistic “revolution” of the 16th century, the reasons for which lie in the radical revision of the symbol’s concept that occurred in the Protestant culture with its non-literal interpretation of transubstantiation. The deontologization of language in the absence of a norm, which was established in France only at the end of the 17th century, led to the popularization of the idea of language as the causes of things, which was evidenced by Scaligerana.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Litterarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-1-110-125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article concentrates on the analysis of Scaligerana, which stood at the origins of the ana tradition, widely represented by works created in the 17th – 19th centuries. The author analyzes the process of creating the text, which is represented by two independent versions (Prima Scaligerana and Secunda Scaligerana), compiled by students and admirers of the philologist Joseph Justus Scaliger, as well as the occuring of the manuscripts, their veneration and the vicissitudes of its publication. The article explores the logic of presenting information about a scholar who appears to the reader as an interlocutor who shares his personal experience and philological research in a private conversation. It demonstrates that the increased interest in the language, etymologies, and interpretations of the “obscurities” is a distinctive feature and the leading plot line of Scaligerana. The article suggests that the reasons for the close attention to language are to be sought in the European linguistic “revolution” of the 16th century, the reasons for which lie in the radical revision of the symbol’s concept that occurred in the Protestant culture with its non-literal interpretation of transubstantiation. The deontologization of language in the absence of a norm, which was established in France only at the end of the 17th century, led to the popularization of the idea of language as the causes of things, which was evidenced by Scaligerana.
Scaligerana:作为情节的语言
这篇文章集中分析了Scaligerana,它站在ana传统的起源,广泛代表了17 - 19世纪创作的作品。作者分析了由语言学家Joseph Justus Scaliger的学生和崇拜者编写的两个独立版本(Prima Scaligerana和Secunda Scaligerana)的文本创作过程,以及手稿的发生,对它们的崇敬和出版的变迁。这篇文章探讨了一个学者呈现信息的逻辑,这个学者以一个对话者的身份出现在读者面前,他在一次私人谈话中分享了他的个人经历和语言学研究。它表明,对语言、词源和对“模糊”的解释的兴趣增加是《Scaligerana》的一个显著特征和主要情节线。从16世纪欧洲的语言“革命”中可以找到对语言的高度关注的原因,其原因在于新教文化中对符号概念的彻底修正,其对变形的非字面解释。在没有规范的情况下,语言的去本体论化(deontologization)直到17世纪末才在法国确立,这导致了语言是事物的原因的观念的普及,这一点在斯卡利格纳(Scaligerana)身上得到了证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Litterarum
Studia Litterarum LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信