From Proletarian Internationalism to Transnational Consciousness

Q3 Arts and Humanities
László Szilárd Szilveszter
{"title":"From Proletarian Internationalism to Transnational Consciousness","authors":"László Szilárd Szilveszter","doi":"10.2478/ausp-2022-0031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Following the Treaty of Trianon, in Transylvania, which had been detached from historical Hungary and attached to Romania, besides the Romanian majority, there lived a considerable Hungarian- and German-speaking minority. Although in the last two decades of the communist dictatorship – in the 70s and 80s – as a consequence of emigration to Germany, the number of ethnic Germans decreased substantially, the number of Hungarian speakers is over one million even today. Regarding the characteristics of the post-World War II literary discourse and cultural policy, in the second half of the forties, the communist power gained control over all manifestations of community life in Romania. It regulated culture and the arts, banned, abolished, or restructured all forums that had enjoyed some kind of independence, and completely revised the literary and artistic canon. In this era, the discourse emphasizing the aspects of revolutionary transformation and radical policy change decisively builds on the enemy image; the fault-line between past and present and the necessity of continuous political struggle prevail in both poetry and prose. In order to achieve the intended social goals, this kind of communist sacrifice ethics regards the annihilation of resisters, protesters, and even of the internal opposition not only as a possibility but as an assumed necessity. This paper aims to present the ideological/political and aesthetic/poetic tendencies that determined Transylvanian Hungarian literature and cultural policy from the mid-40s until the end of 20th century.","PeriodicalId":37574,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ausp-2022-0031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Following the Treaty of Trianon, in Transylvania, which had been detached from historical Hungary and attached to Romania, besides the Romanian majority, there lived a considerable Hungarian- and German-speaking minority. Although in the last two decades of the communist dictatorship – in the 70s and 80s – as a consequence of emigration to Germany, the number of ethnic Germans decreased substantially, the number of Hungarian speakers is over one million even today. Regarding the characteristics of the post-World War II literary discourse and cultural policy, in the second half of the forties, the communist power gained control over all manifestations of community life in Romania. It regulated culture and the arts, banned, abolished, or restructured all forums that had enjoyed some kind of independence, and completely revised the literary and artistic canon. In this era, the discourse emphasizing the aspects of revolutionary transformation and radical policy change decisively builds on the enemy image; the fault-line between past and present and the necessity of continuous political struggle prevail in both poetry and prose. In order to achieve the intended social goals, this kind of communist sacrifice ethics regards the annihilation of resisters, protesters, and even of the internal opposition not only as a possibility but as an assumed necessity. This paper aims to present the ideological/political and aesthetic/poetic tendencies that determined Transylvanian Hungarian literature and cultural policy from the mid-40s until the end of 20th century.
从无产阶级国际主义到跨国意识
《特里亚农条约》签订后,在特兰西瓦尼亚,这个从历史上的匈牙利分离出来并附属于罗马尼亚的地方,除了罗马尼亚人占多数外,还居住着相当数量的讲匈牙利语和德语的少数民族。虽然在共产主义独裁统治的最后二十年- -在70年代和80年代- -由于移民到德国,德意志民族的人数大大减少,但时至今日讲匈牙利语的人数仍超过100万。就二战后文学话语和文化政策的特点而言,在40年代后半期,共产主义权力控制了罗马尼亚社区生活的所有表现形式。它规范文化和艺术,禁止、废除或重组所有享有某种独立性的论坛,并彻底修改文学和艺术经典。在这个时代,强调革命转型和激进政策变革方面的话语果断地建立在敌人形象之上;在诗歌和散文中,过去和现在之间的分界线以及持续的政治斗争的必要性普遍存在。为了达到预定的社会目标,这种共产主义的牺牲伦理不仅把歼灭抵抗者、抗议者,甚至歼灭内部的反对派视为一种可能性,而且是一种假定的必要性。本文旨在呈现从40年代中期到20世纪末,决定特兰西瓦尼亚匈牙利文学和文化政策的意识形态/政治和审美/诗歌倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Philologica Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Series Philologica is published in cooperation with Sciendo by De Gruyter. Series Philologica publishes original, previously unpublished articles in the wide field of philological studies, and it is published in 3 issues a year (since 2014). The printed and online version of papers are identical.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信