Blurring public-private boundaries: governance of information sharing in global trade networks

B. Klievink, M. Janssen, Yao-Hua Tan
{"title":"Blurring public-private boundaries: governance of information sharing in global trade networks","authors":"B. Klievink, M. Janssen, Yao-Hua Tan","doi":"10.1145/2307729.2307758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative networks comprising both public and private organisations are seen as the contemporary form of organising public action. However, in these networks, public organisations and private organisations bring in different approaches to their operations and interactions with other parties. These different approaches provide different and sometimes competing directions for the coordination of public-private collaborations. In this paper, we discuss the background of public-private collaboration and conduct an explorative case study in which innovation in data sharing between multiple stakeholders in global trade networks leads to issues in the functionality on the boundary between public and private data. A shift in boundaries and a higher dependence on other actors is the result of a digital infrastructure innovation with both public and private components. We found that hierarchical and market governance modes are both present and offer competing directions for operating on the public-private boundary. The case study results show the need for a public-private governance approach to deal with the issues that arise at the boundary between the two sectors. A major issue there is how public or community services that are provided by a private party can be upheld while at the same time providing a revenue model for the businesses involved.","PeriodicalId":93488,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Digital Government Research. International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ... International Conference on Digital Government Research. International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2307729.2307758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Collaborative networks comprising both public and private organisations are seen as the contemporary form of organising public action. However, in these networks, public organisations and private organisations bring in different approaches to their operations and interactions with other parties. These different approaches provide different and sometimes competing directions for the coordination of public-private collaborations. In this paper, we discuss the background of public-private collaboration and conduct an explorative case study in which innovation in data sharing between multiple stakeholders in global trade networks leads to issues in the functionality on the boundary between public and private data. A shift in boundaries and a higher dependence on other actors is the result of a digital infrastructure innovation with both public and private components. We found that hierarchical and market governance modes are both present and offer competing directions for operating on the public-private boundary. The case study results show the need for a public-private governance approach to deal with the issues that arise at the boundary between the two sectors. A major issue there is how public or community services that are provided by a private party can be upheld while at the same time providing a revenue model for the businesses involved.
模糊公私界限:全球贸易网络中信息共享的治理
由公共和私人组织组成的协作网络被视为组织公共行动的当代形式。然而,在这些网络中,公共组织和私人组织在运作和与其他各方的互动中采用了不同的方法。这些不同的方法为公私合作的协调提供了不同的、有时是相互竞争的方向。在本文中,我们讨论了公私合作的背景,并进行了一个探索性案例研究,其中全球贸易网络中多个利益相关者之间的数据共享创新导致了公共和私人数据边界上的功能问题。边界的转变和对其他行为者的更高依赖是公共和私人组成部分的数字基础设施创新的结果。研究发现,分级治理模式和市场治理模式同时存在,并为公私边界上的运行提供了相互竞争的方向。案例研究结果表明,需要一种公私治理方法来处理在两个部门之间的边界上出现的问题。一个主要的问题是,如何维持由私人方提供的公共或社区服务,同时为相关企业提供收入模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信