{"title":"Polypharmacy in very elderly hospitalised patients: a single centre study","authors":"Iouri Banakh","doi":"10.18314/jpt.v4i1.1139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: \nTo quantify the extent of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMS) in very elderly hospitalised patients. \nMethod: \nA retrospective audit of prescribed medications among hospitalised medical patients (?80 years). The number of regular medications was categorised as: non-polypharmacy (0-4 drugs), polypharmacy (5-9 drugs) and hyper-polypharmacy (? 10 drugs). \nResults: \n318 patient records were reviewed with a mean age of 86.3 years, Polypharmacy was identified in 50.6% of patients and hyper-polypharmacy in 31.2%, while only 18.2% of patients had non-polypharmacy. 62.3% of patients received at least one psychotropic agent, most commonly anti-depressants (26.1%) followed by sedatives (19.5%). Antidepressant use correlated significantly with a history of falls, P=0.005. Other commonly prescribed medications were proton-pump inhibitors (53.5%), diuretics (48.1%), statins (45.6%), beta-blockers (34.3%) and anti-coagulation agents (21.7%). \nConclusion: \nOur study showed that over 80% of hospitalised very elderly patients were exposed to polypharmacy, and many patients were prescribed PIMS.","PeriodicalId":16742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutics and Therapeutics","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutics and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18314/jpt.v4i1.1139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives:
To quantify the extent of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMS) in very elderly hospitalised patients.
Method:
A retrospective audit of prescribed medications among hospitalised medical patients (?80 years). The number of regular medications was categorised as: non-polypharmacy (0-4 drugs), polypharmacy (5-9 drugs) and hyper-polypharmacy (? 10 drugs).
Results:
318 patient records were reviewed with a mean age of 86.3 years, Polypharmacy was identified in 50.6% of patients and hyper-polypharmacy in 31.2%, while only 18.2% of patients had non-polypharmacy. 62.3% of patients received at least one psychotropic agent, most commonly anti-depressants (26.1%) followed by sedatives (19.5%). Antidepressant use correlated significantly with a history of falls, P=0.005. Other commonly prescribed medications were proton-pump inhibitors (53.5%), diuretics (48.1%), statins (45.6%), beta-blockers (34.3%) and anti-coagulation agents (21.7%).
Conclusion:
Our study showed that over 80% of hospitalised very elderly patients were exposed to polypharmacy, and many patients were prescribed PIMS.