Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Fabricated Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Endocrowns and Post Retained Crowns with Two Preparation designs

Walaa El-Hefnawy, A. Ahmed, Walaa El-Mekkawi
{"title":"Fracture Resistance of CAD/CAM Fabricated Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Endocrowns and Post Retained Crowns with Two Preparation designs","authors":"Walaa El-Hefnawy, A. Ahmed, Walaa El-Mekkawi","doi":"10.21608/adjg.2022.85202.1399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the fracture resistance of PEEK endocrowns and post-retained PEEK crowns with two preparation designs (ferrule and without ferrule). Materials and methods: Eighty sound human mandibular first premolars were selected. Teeth were divided into 4 main groups (n= 20): Group1: Were assigned for endocrown preparation with Butt joint. Group 2: Were assigned for endocrown preparation with Shoulder finish line. Group 3: Were assigned for PEEK post & core preparation without ferrule. Group 4: Were assigned for PEEK post & core preparation with ferrule. Endocrowns of both Group 1 and Group 2 were made of PEEK material veneered with composite. Both Group 3 and Group 4 were covered with PEEK crowns veneered with composite. All Restorations either PEEK post & cores or endocrowns and final crowns were sandblasted with 110 Mm aluminium oxide. Finally, cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (G-Cem cement). Results: The highest mean value was recorded in Post & core with ferrule (above CEJ) (1262.29±65.02), followed by Endocrown with Butt Joint (1101.44 ± 81.7), then Endocrown with Shoulder finish line (890.99±75.42), with the least value recorded in Post & core without ferrule (below CEJ) (726.03±71.26). Statistically, ANOVA test showed a considerable difference between groups (p=0.00). Tukey’s post hoc test showed a considerable difference between each 2 groups. Conclusion: It was concluded that the mandibular premolars that were restored by PEEK Post-cores covered with crowns which designed with ferrule recorded the highest fracture resistance load. Codex : 05/22.04 azhardentj@azhar.edu.eg http://adjg.journals.ekb.eg DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2022.85202.1399 Restorative Dentistry (Removable Prosthodontics, Fixed Prosthodontics, Endodontics, Dental Biomaterials, Operative Dentistry)","PeriodicalId":7493,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2022.85202.1399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess the fracture resistance of PEEK endocrowns and post-retained PEEK crowns with two preparation designs (ferrule and without ferrule). Materials and methods: Eighty sound human mandibular first premolars were selected. Teeth were divided into 4 main groups (n= 20): Group1: Were assigned for endocrown preparation with Butt joint. Group 2: Were assigned for endocrown preparation with Shoulder finish line. Group 3: Were assigned for PEEK post & core preparation without ferrule. Group 4: Were assigned for PEEK post & core preparation with ferrule. Endocrowns of both Group 1 and Group 2 were made of PEEK material veneered with composite. Both Group 3 and Group 4 were covered with PEEK crowns veneered with composite. All Restorations either PEEK post & cores or endocrowns and final crowns were sandblasted with 110 Mm aluminium oxide. Finally, cemented with self-adhesive resin cement (G-Cem cement). Results: The highest mean value was recorded in Post & core with ferrule (above CEJ) (1262.29±65.02), followed by Endocrown with Butt Joint (1101.44 ± 81.7), then Endocrown with Shoulder finish line (890.99±75.42), with the least value recorded in Post & core without ferrule (below CEJ) (726.03±71.26). Statistically, ANOVA test showed a considerable difference between groups (p=0.00). Tukey’s post hoc test showed a considerable difference between each 2 groups. Conclusion: It was concluded that the mandibular premolars that were restored by PEEK Post-cores covered with crowns which designed with ferrule recorded the highest fracture resistance load. Codex : 05/22.04 azhardentj@azhar.edu.eg http://adjg.journals.ekb.eg DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2022.85202.1399 Restorative Dentistry (Removable Prosthodontics, Fixed Prosthodontics, Endodontics, Dental Biomaterials, Operative Dentistry)
CAD/CAM制备聚醚醚酮(PEEK)内冠和桩固位冠的抗断裂性能
目的:本研究的目的是评估两种制备设计(有箍和无箍)的PEEK内冠和后保留PEEK冠的抗骨折性。材料与方法:选择80颗健全的人下颌第一前磨牙。主要分为4组(n= 20):第一组:采用对接进行内冠预备。第二组:采用肩终点线进行内冠预备。第三组:无卡箍的PEEK桩芯制备。第4组:用卡箍制备PEEK桩芯。组1和组2的内冠均采用PEEK材料贴面复合材料。第3组和第4组均采用复合材料贴面PEEK冠。所有修复体,无论是PEEK桩和核心,还是内冠和最终冠,都用110毫米氧化铝喷砂。最后用自粘树脂水泥(G-Cem水泥)进行胶结。结果:带箍桩核组(CEJ以上)的平均值最高(1262.29±65.02),其次是带对接的Endocrown(1101.44±81.7),其次是带肩终点线的Endocrown(890.99±75.42),无箍桩核组(CEJ以下)的平均值最低(726.03±71.26)。统计学上,方差分析显示组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.00)。Tukey的事后检验显示两组之间有相当大的差异。结论:采用聚醚醚酮桩核修复下颌前磨牙的抗断载荷最高。法典:05/22.04 azhardentj@azhar.edu.eg http://adjg.journals.ekb.eg DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2022.85202.1399修复牙科(可移动修复学,固定修复学,牙髓学,牙科生物材料,牙科手术)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信