Sampling for Genetically Modified Organisms Content Analysisin Agricultural Products: From Analytical Sample to Test Portion

Jing Xu, Jiang Zheng, Lu Gao, Jijuan Cao
{"title":"Sampling for Genetically Modified Organisms Content Analysisin Agricultural Products: From Analytical Sample to Test Portion","authors":"Jing Xu, Jiang Zheng, Lu Gao, Jijuan Cao","doi":"10.11648/J.IJNFS.20190801.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: At present, Sampling standards and regulations for genetically modified organisms (GMO) are commonly based on theoretical calculations or computer simulations, and there is a lack of field data to validate these simulations. In view of this situation, we sampled agricultural products for GMO content analysis, and investigated the influence of various factors on the accuracy of the results. We have prepared a three-part series and in this part focused on the process from analytical sample to test portions. Method: Using non-transgenic maize as matrix, 12 lines of transgenic maize were used to produce standard analytical samples. After systematic sampling, the GMO contents of these samples were randomly tested, and their single relative standard deviations (RSD) were calculated as a measure of total RSD (single analysis) per sample. Results: By comparing the RSDs of various sampling methods, it was found that the results of 12 strains were basically consistent, and the data of MON810 were listed as a representative. The parameters affecting the standard deviation included the content ( a AS ), particle size ( d AS ), test portion mass ( M TP ) and the number of increments ( n IT ). Total analytical RSD could be reduced by decreasing particle size, and increasing test portion mass or the number of increments. Based on current laboratory testing conditions and current used kits, for high content analytical sample(>0.01%), more than 2 duplicate test portions with at least -100mesh particle size and 200mg mass were recommended. Conclusion: Based on the results, the recommended values of particle size, test portion mass and the number of increments for the process from analytical sample to test portions were given. These factors were independent on species or strains of the product, so the results were suitable to all species and strains, provided that the solid particles could be crushed to required particle size.","PeriodicalId":14174,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJNFS.20190801.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: At present, Sampling standards and regulations for genetically modified organisms (GMO) are commonly based on theoretical calculations or computer simulations, and there is a lack of field data to validate these simulations. In view of this situation, we sampled agricultural products for GMO content analysis, and investigated the influence of various factors on the accuracy of the results. We have prepared a three-part series and in this part focused on the process from analytical sample to test portions. Method: Using non-transgenic maize as matrix, 12 lines of transgenic maize were used to produce standard analytical samples. After systematic sampling, the GMO contents of these samples were randomly tested, and their single relative standard deviations (RSD) were calculated as a measure of total RSD (single analysis) per sample. Results: By comparing the RSDs of various sampling methods, it was found that the results of 12 strains were basically consistent, and the data of MON810 were listed as a representative. The parameters affecting the standard deviation included the content ( a AS ), particle size ( d AS ), test portion mass ( M TP ) and the number of increments ( n IT ). Total analytical RSD could be reduced by decreasing particle size, and increasing test portion mass or the number of increments. Based on current laboratory testing conditions and current used kits, for high content analytical sample(>0.01%), more than 2 duplicate test portions with at least -100mesh particle size and 200mg mass were recommended. Conclusion: Based on the results, the recommended values of particle size, test portion mass and the number of increments for the process from analytical sample to test portions were given. These factors were independent on species or strains of the product, so the results were suitable to all species and strains, provided that the solid particles could be crushed to required particle size.
农产品中转基因生物含量分析的取样:从分析样品到测试部分
目的:目前,转基因生物的采样标准和法规通常基于理论计算或计算机模拟,缺乏实地数据来验证这些模拟。针对这种情况,我们选取农产品进行转基因含量分析,考察各种因素对结果准确性的影响。我们准备了一个由三部分组成的系列,在这一部分中重点介绍了从分析样品到测试部分的过程。方法:以非转基因玉米为基质,用12个转基因玉米品系制作标准分析样品。系统抽样后,随机检测样品的转基因生物含量,计算其单一相对标准偏差(RSD),作为每个样品的总RSD(单次分析)的度量。结果:通过比较各种取样方法的rsd,发现12株菌株的结果基本一致,以MON810菌株的数据为代表。影响标准偏差的参数包括含量(a AS)、粒径(d AS)、测试部分质量(M TP)和增量数(n IT)。通过减小颗粒尺寸、增加测试部分质量或增量数可以降低总分析RSD。根据目前的实验室检测条件和目前使用的试剂盒,对于高含量分析样品(>0.01%),建议使用2个以上的重复测试部分,其粒度至少为-100目,质量至少为200mg。结论:在此基础上,给出了从分析样品到测试部分的粒径、测试部分质量和增量数的推荐值。这些因素与产物的种类或菌株无关,因此只要固体颗粒能够被粉碎到所需的粒度,结果适用于所有种类和菌株。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信