Resistance to Extinction of Evaluative Fear Conditioning in Delusion Proneness.

IF 2 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL ISSUES
Youth & Society Pub Date : 2022-06-05 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac033
Anaïs Louzolo, Alexander V Lebedev, Malin Björnsdotter, Kasim Acar, Christine Ahrends, Morten L Kringelbach, Martin Ingvar, Andreas Olsson, Predrag Petrovic
{"title":"Resistance to Extinction of Evaluative Fear Conditioning in Delusion Proneness.","authors":"Anaïs Louzolo, Alexander V Lebedev, Malin Björnsdotter, Kasim Acar, Christine Ahrends, Morten L Kringelbach, Martin Ingvar, Andreas Olsson, Predrag Petrovic","doi":"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delusional beliefs consist of strong priors characterized by resistance to change even when evidence supporting another view is overwhelming. Such bias against disconfirmatory evidence (BADE) has been experimentally demonstrated in patients with psychosis as well as in delusion proneness. In this fMRI-study, we tested for similar resistance to change and associated brain processes in extinction of fear learning, involving a well-described mechanism dependent of evidence updating. A social fear conditioning paradigm was used in which four faces had either been coupled to an unconditioned aversive stimulus (CS+) or not (CS-). For two of the faces, instructions had been given about the fear contingencies (iCS+/iCS-) while for two other faces no such instructions had been given (niCS+/niCS-). Interaction analysis suggested that individuals who score high on delusion-proneness (hDP; <i>n</i> = 20) displayed less extinction of evaluative fear compared to those with low delusion proneness (lDP; <i>n</i> = 23; <i>n</i> = 19 in fMRI-analysis) for non-instructed faces (<i>F</i> = 5.469, <i>P</i> = .024). The resistance to extinction was supported by a difference in extinction related activity between the two groups in medial prefrontal cortex and its connectivity with amygdala, as well as in a cortical network supporting fear processing. For instructed faces no extinction was noted, but there was a larger evaluative fear (<i>F</i> = 5.048, <i>P</i> = 0.03) and an increased functional connectivity between lateral orbitofrontal cortex and fear processing regions for hDP than lDP. Our study links previous explored BADE-effects in delusion associated phenotypes to fear extinction, and suggest that effects of instructions on evaluative fear learning are more pronounced in delusion prone subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":47959,"journal":{"name":"Youth & Society","volume":"47 1","pages":"sgac033"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11205979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Youth & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delusional beliefs consist of strong priors characterized by resistance to change even when evidence supporting another view is overwhelming. Such bias against disconfirmatory evidence (BADE) has been experimentally demonstrated in patients with psychosis as well as in delusion proneness. In this fMRI-study, we tested for similar resistance to change and associated brain processes in extinction of fear learning, involving a well-described mechanism dependent of evidence updating. A social fear conditioning paradigm was used in which four faces had either been coupled to an unconditioned aversive stimulus (CS+) or not (CS-). For two of the faces, instructions had been given about the fear contingencies (iCS+/iCS-) while for two other faces no such instructions had been given (niCS+/niCS-). Interaction analysis suggested that individuals who score high on delusion-proneness (hDP; n = 20) displayed less extinction of evaluative fear compared to those with low delusion proneness (lDP; n = 23; n = 19 in fMRI-analysis) for non-instructed faces (F = 5.469, P = .024). The resistance to extinction was supported by a difference in extinction related activity between the two groups in medial prefrontal cortex and its connectivity with amygdala, as well as in a cortical network supporting fear processing. For instructed faces no extinction was noted, but there was a larger evaluative fear (F = 5.048, P = 0.03) and an increased functional connectivity between lateral orbitofrontal cortex and fear processing regions for hDP than lDP. Our study links previous explored BADE-effects in delusion associated phenotypes to fear extinction, and suggest that effects of instructions on evaluative fear learning are more pronounced in delusion prone subjects.

妄想倾向中评价性恐惧条件反射的消退阻力
妄想信念由强烈的先验信念组成,其特点是即使支持另一种观点的证据压倒一切也不愿改变。这种对不确定证据的偏见(BADE)已在精神病患者和妄想症患者身上得到实验证明。在这项 fMRI 研究中,我们测试了恐惧学习消退过程中类似的对改变的抵制和相关大脑过程,其中涉及一种依赖于证据更新的描述良好的机制。在社会恐惧条件反射范式中,四张面孔要么与无条件的厌恶刺激(CS+)相连,要么与之无关(CS-)。对于其中两张面孔,已经给出了有关恐惧或然条件的说明(iCS+/iCS-),而对于另外两张面孔,则没有给出此类说明(niCS+/niCS-)。交互作用分析表明,与妄想倾向低(lDP;n = 23;fMRI 分析中 n = 19)的人相比,妄想倾向高(hDP;n = 20)的人对无指令面孔的评价性恐惧消减较少(F = 5.469,P = .024)。在内侧前额叶皮层及其与杏仁核的连通性以及支持恐惧处理的皮层网络中,两组之间与消退相关的活动存在差异,这支持了对消退的抵抗。对于指令性面孔,没有发现消退现象,但与长时消退相比,短时消退组的评价性恐惧更大(F = 5.048,P = 0.03),而且外侧眶额皮层与恐惧处理区域之间的功能连接性增强。我们的研究将之前探讨的妄想相关表型中的BADE效应与恐惧消退联系起来,并表明指令对评价性恐惧学习的影响在易患妄想症的受试者中更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Youth & Society
Youth & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: For thirty-five years, Youth & Society has provided educators, counsellors, researchers, and policy makers with the latest research and scholarship in this dynamic field. This valuable resource examines critical contemporary issues and presents vital, practical information for studying and working with young people today. Each quarterly issue of Youth & Society features peer-reviewed articles by distinguished scholars and practitioners from a variety of disciplines and fields, including: sociology, public health, social work, education, criminology, psychology, anthropology, human services, and political science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信