The effect of clinical risk management training on patient safety competency and related aspects in nursing students

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mahnaz Padash, S. Miri, Mansooreh Azizzadeh Forouzi, Somayeh Jouparinejad, Jamileh Farokhzadian
{"title":"The effect of clinical risk management training on patient safety competency and related aspects in nursing students","authors":"Mahnaz Padash, S. Miri, Mansooreh Azizzadeh Forouzi, Somayeh Jouparinejad, Jamileh Farokhzadian","doi":"10.1177/25160435231190198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Students’ exposure to clinical risk management during their studentships can improve their safety competency, comfort speaking up about patient safety, and attitudes toward patient safety education. This study aimed to determine the effect of clinical risk management training on nursing students’ patient safety competency, attitudes toward broader aspects of patient safety in professional education, and comfort in speaking up about patient safety. Methods This experimental study used stratified sampling to assign 56 nursing students to intervention and control groups (28 students in each group). The intervention group received clinical risk management training in three three-hour sessions. The Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey was used to collect data from both groups before and one month after the intervention. Results The study found no statistically significant difference in patient safety competency and its subscales between the intervention and control groups in the pretest stage, but these competencies increased significantly in the intervention group in the post-test stage compared to the control group. The mean scores of attitudes toward broader aspects of patient safety in professional education and comfort speaking up about patient safety did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups in the pre-test stage, but they increased significantly in the intervention group in the post-test stage compared with the control group. Conclusion It is recommended that clinical risk management and patient safety training be applied to the nursing curriculum so that nursing students become competent to provide safe care in clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":73888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","volume":"38 1","pages":"170 - 176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435231190198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Students’ exposure to clinical risk management during their studentships can improve their safety competency, comfort speaking up about patient safety, and attitudes toward patient safety education. This study aimed to determine the effect of clinical risk management training on nursing students’ patient safety competency, attitudes toward broader aspects of patient safety in professional education, and comfort in speaking up about patient safety. Methods This experimental study used stratified sampling to assign 56 nursing students to intervention and control groups (28 students in each group). The intervention group received clinical risk management training in three three-hour sessions. The Health Professional Education in Patient Safety Survey was used to collect data from both groups before and one month after the intervention. Results The study found no statistically significant difference in patient safety competency and its subscales between the intervention and control groups in the pretest stage, but these competencies increased significantly in the intervention group in the post-test stage compared to the control group. The mean scores of attitudes toward broader aspects of patient safety in professional education and comfort speaking up about patient safety did not differ significantly between the intervention and control groups in the pre-test stage, but they increased significantly in the intervention group in the post-test stage compared with the control group. Conclusion It is recommended that clinical risk management and patient safety training be applied to the nursing curriculum so that nursing students become competent to provide safe care in clinical settings.
临床风险管理培训对护生患者安全能力及相关方面的影响
背景学生在学习期间接触临床风险管理可以提高他们的安全能力,更愿意谈论患者安全,以及对患者安全教育的态度。本研究旨在探讨临床风险管理培训对护生患者安全能力、专业教育中对患者安全更广泛方面的态度以及畅所欲言患者安全的影响。方法采用分层抽样的方法,将56名护生分为干预组和对照组,每组28名。干预组接受临床风险管理培训,分三次,每次三小时。采用“患者安全卫生专业教育调查”收集干预前和干预后一个月两组的数据。结果干预组患者安全胜任力及其量表在测试前阶段与对照组无统计学差异,但在测试后阶段干预组患者安全胜任力显著高于对照组。在测试前阶段,干预组和对照组对更广泛的患者安全专业教育和安慰方面的态度的平均得分在测试后阶段没有显著差异,但在测试后阶段,干预组与对照组相比显著增加。结论建议在护理课程中引入临床风险管理和患者安全培训,使护生具备在临床环境中提供安全护理的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信