Performance of Growing Rabbits Fed Diets Containing Graded Levels of Gmelina (Gmelina arborea) Fruit Pulp Meal

J. N. Ingweye
{"title":"Performance of Growing Rabbits Fed Diets Containing Graded Levels of Gmelina (Gmelina arborea) Fruit Pulp Meal","authors":"J. N. Ingweye","doi":"10.4314/JARD.V19I1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study involved the recycling of gmelina fruit pulp to animal feed to reduce environmental pollution by evaluating the feed intake and body weight changes of rabbits fed diets incorporated with Ripe Gmelina Fruit Pulp (RGFP) at 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% in replacement of maize as groups I, II, III, IV and V, respectively. Sixty (60) rabbits in five groups of 12 animals each were used for the eight-week study in completely randomized design experiment. Initial weight, final weight, weight gain, feed intake (concentrate + forage), concentrate intake and forage intake ranged from 575–575.02g, 1605–1900g, 1029.98–1324.99g, 8130–7569.85g, 5711.33–1177.11g, 6392.74–2418.67g, respectively. All these parameters were significantly affected (p<0.05) by inclusion of RGFP except initial weight. Feed conversion ratio (FCR), water intake (ml), water–feed ratio and protein efficiency ratio ranged from 7.35–6.14, 278.34–203.36, 0.034–0.027 and 0.8–0.53, respectively. These parameters were also significantly affected (p<0.05) by inclusion of RGFP in diets except water–feed ratio and protein efficiency ratio. Weight gain, total feed intake (concentrate + forage), concentrate intake and water intake of rabbits fed 0% RGFP were the highest (p<0.05) while the 100% RGFP group recorded the least (p<0.05). Weight gain and total feed intake of 0% RGFP group was similar to those of groups 25%, and 50%. The 100% RGFP fed rabbits had the highest (p<0.05) forage intake but least (p<0.05) FCR while 0% RGFP fed group had the least (p<0.05) forage intake and highest (p<0.05) FCR. Weight gain, total feed intake (concentrate + forage), concentrate intake and water intake significantly (p<0.05) decreased as RGFP increased while FCR and forage intake increased significantly (p<0.05) as RGFP increased. This study suggests that RGFP could replace up to 50% of maize, beyond which the animals start losing weight. \nKeywords: Hindgut fermenter, Gmelina fruit waste, rabbit nutrition, recycling","PeriodicalId":18575,"journal":{"name":"Minia Journal of Agricultural Research and Development","volume":"15 1","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minia Journal of Agricultural Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JARD.V19I1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study involved the recycling of gmelina fruit pulp to animal feed to reduce environmental pollution by evaluating the feed intake and body weight changes of rabbits fed diets incorporated with Ripe Gmelina Fruit Pulp (RGFP) at 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100% in replacement of maize as groups I, II, III, IV and V, respectively. Sixty (60) rabbits in five groups of 12 animals each were used for the eight-week study in completely randomized design experiment. Initial weight, final weight, weight gain, feed intake (concentrate + forage), concentrate intake and forage intake ranged from 575–575.02g, 1605–1900g, 1029.98–1324.99g, 8130–7569.85g, 5711.33–1177.11g, 6392.74–2418.67g, respectively. All these parameters were significantly affected (p<0.05) by inclusion of RGFP except initial weight. Feed conversion ratio (FCR), water intake (ml), water–feed ratio and protein efficiency ratio ranged from 7.35–6.14, 278.34–203.36, 0.034–0.027 and 0.8–0.53, respectively. These parameters were also significantly affected (p<0.05) by inclusion of RGFP in diets except water–feed ratio and protein efficiency ratio. Weight gain, total feed intake (concentrate + forage), concentrate intake and water intake of rabbits fed 0% RGFP were the highest (p<0.05) while the 100% RGFP group recorded the least (p<0.05). Weight gain and total feed intake of 0% RGFP group was similar to those of groups 25%, and 50%. The 100% RGFP fed rabbits had the highest (p<0.05) forage intake but least (p<0.05) FCR while 0% RGFP fed group had the least (p<0.05) forage intake and highest (p<0.05) FCR. Weight gain, total feed intake (concentrate + forage), concentrate intake and water intake significantly (p<0.05) decreased as RGFP increased while FCR and forage intake increased significantly (p<0.05) as RGFP increased. This study suggests that RGFP could replace up to 50% of maize, beyond which the animals start losing weight. Keywords: Hindgut fermenter, Gmelina fruit waste, rabbit nutrition, recycling
饲粮中添加分级水平小木耳果肉粕对生长兔生产性能的影响
本研究通过评价添加成熟gfp (RGFP)的兔饲粮在0、25、50、75和100%替代玉米时,分别饲喂1、2、3、4、5组的采食量和体重变化,将gfp再循环用于动物饲料,以减少环境污染。实验采用完全随机设计,60只家兔分为5组,每组12只,进行为期8周的研究。初重、末重、增重、采食量(精料+粗料)、精料采食量、粗料采食量分别为575 ~ 575.02g、1605 ~ 1900g、1029.98 ~ 1324.99g、8130 ~ 7569.85g、5711.33 ~ 1177.11g、6392.74 ~ 2418.67g。除初始质量外,RGFP对其他参数均有显著影响(p<0.05)。饲料系数(FCR)、采食量(ml)、水料比和蛋白质效率分别为7.35 ~ 6.14、278.34 ~ 203.36、0.034 ~ 0.027和0.8 ~ 0.53。饲料中添加RGFP对除水料比和蛋白质效率外的其他参数均有显著影响(p<0.05)。0% RGFP组家兔增重、总采食量(精料+粗料)、精料采食量和水采食量最高(p<0.05), 100% RGFP组最低(p<0.05)。0% RGFP组的增重和总采食量与25%和50%组相近。100% RGFP饲喂组采食量最高(p<0.05),料重比最低(p<0.05); 0% RGFP饲喂组采食量最少(p<0.05),料重比最高(p<0.05)。随着RGFP的增加,增重、总采食量(精料+粗料)、精料采食量和采水量显著降低(p<0.05),料重比和采食量显著升高(p<0.05)。这项研究表明,RGFP可以取代高达50%的玉米,超过这个比例,动物的体重就会开始下降。关键词:后肠发酵罐,果渣,家兔营养,循环利用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信