Las artes liberales y el Mixing Methods: buenas razones para formar ciudadanos y pobres peregrinos como hombres libres

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
J. Andrés-gallego
{"title":"Las artes liberales y el Mixing Methods: buenas razones para formar ciudadanos y pobres peregrinos como hombres libres","authors":"J. Andrés-gallego","doi":"10.3989/arbor.2019.794n4001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mixing methods is a well-known innovative methodologic proposal for research in the second half of the 20th century social sciences. Reading literature about it, I observed the aspect that justifies this paper: Authors of theoretical contributions on mixing methods recognized that this was known to be a practice already in use many centuries ago. Some of them even have re-examined the whole history of the scientific method to search precedents. They are however individual and theoretical precedents. I add in this paper the practical projection of these and other methodological theories on people’s training from Greek classical times. My hypothesis is that liberal arts was the basic syllabus in Western -and westernized- education for more than a millennium in such a way that results of their training precisely involved to mixing methods. In return, to understand the liberal arts in the light of mixing methods shows new aspects of their historical interest. I study the theoretical basis of this syllabus from Cicero to Alcuin. More important for future research, I conclude that Alcuin’s thesis about the correspondence between the gifts of the Holy Spiritu and the seven liberal arts can be extended to the Aristotelian dianoethics habits and to Dilthey’s 20th-century sciences of mind.","PeriodicalId":45891,"journal":{"name":"ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/arbor.2019.794n4001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mixing methods is a well-known innovative methodologic proposal for research in the second half of the 20th century social sciences. Reading literature about it, I observed the aspect that justifies this paper: Authors of theoretical contributions on mixing methods recognized that this was known to be a practice already in use many centuries ago. Some of them even have re-examined the whole history of the scientific method to search precedents. They are however individual and theoretical precedents. I add in this paper the practical projection of these and other methodological theories on people’s training from Greek classical times. My hypothesis is that liberal arts was the basic syllabus in Western -and westernized- education for more than a millennium in such a way that results of their training precisely involved to mixing methods. In return, to understand the liberal arts in the light of mixing methods shows new aspects of their historical interest. I study the theoretical basis of this syllabus from Cicero to Alcuin. More important for future research, I conclude that Alcuin’s thesis about the correspondence between the gifts of the Holy Spiritu and the seven liberal arts can be extended to the Aristotelian dianoethics habits and to Dilthey’s 20th-century sciences of mind.
文科和混合方法:把公民和贫穷的朝圣者培养成自由人的好理由
混合方法是20世纪下半叶社会科学研究中一种著名的创新方法。通过阅读相关文献,我观察到这篇论文的合理性:关于混合方法的理论贡献的作者认识到,这是一种已知的实践,在许多世纪以前就已经在使用了。他们中的一些人甚至重新审视了科学方法的整个历史,以寻找先例。然而,它们是个别的和理论上的先例。我在本文中补充了这些和其他希腊古典时期关于人的训练的方法论理论的实践投影。我的假设是,在一千多年的时间里,文科一直是西方和西方化的教育的基本教学大纲,其训练结果恰恰涉及到混合方法。反过来,在混合方法的光照下理解文科显示了他们历史兴趣的新方面。我研究了从西塞罗到阿尔昆的教学大纲的理论基础。对于未来的研究更重要的是,我得出结论,阿尔昆关于圣灵的恩赐与七门文科之间的对应关系的论点可以扩展到亚里士多德的精神伦理学习惯和狄尔泰20世纪的心灵科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA
ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊介绍: Arbor is a bimonthly Journal publishing original articles on Science, Thought and Culture. By examining different topics with a rigorous scientific approach, Arbor intends to service the Spanish society and scientific community by providing information, updating, reflection and debate on subjects of current interest. Arbor is among the oldest Journals published by CSIC, and is open to researchers and Culture creators and managers, both Spanish and foreign.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信