A Systematic Review of Interventions Promoting Parental Involvement in the Education of School-Aged Children With Disabilities

IF 0.6 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
D. Musendo, N. Scherer, Joyline Jepkosgei, Lillian Maweu, Audrey Mupiwa, Onai Hara, Sarah Polack, Daksha Patel
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Interventions Promoting Parental Involvement in the Education of School-Aged Children With Disabilities","authors":"D. Musendo, N. Scherer, Joyline Jepkosgei, Lillian Maweu, Audrey Mupiwa, Onai Hara, Sarah Polack, Daksha Patel","doi":"10.1017/jsi.2023.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The purpose of this study was to systematically map and synthesise literature on interventions that promote the involvement of parents of school-aged children with disabilities in education. The study focused on peer-reviewed, primary intervention studies published in English between 2000 and 2021. Nine databases were searched, and 21 articles were identified and included in the review. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies, and narrative analysis was used to synthesise the data. The duration of the interventions varied from 7 to 36 months. Most studies were conducted within the context of high-income countries and focused on parents of children with intellectual disabilities. Most studies reported positive effects on one or more groups: parents, children, schools, and communities. However, there was heterogeneity in the outcome measures used, which limits comparability across interventions. The quality assessment revealed high-/medium-bias risks in most articles. Future research should include higher quality studies driven by theoretical models. The results support the need for more research on parental involvement in the education of children with disabilities, especially intervention studies within the context of low- and medium-income countries.","PeriodicalId":53789,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2023.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to systematically map and synthesise literature on interventions that promote the involvement of parents of school-aged children with disabilities in education. The study focused on peer-reviewed, primary intervention studies published in English between 2000 and 2021. Nine databases were searched, and 21 articles were identified and included in the review. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies, and narrative analysis was used to synthesise the data. The duration of the interventions varied from 7 to 36 months. Most studies were conducted within the context of high-income countries and focused on parents of children with intellectual disabilities. Most studies reported positive effects on one or more groups: parents, children, schools, and communities. However, there was heterogeneity in the outcome measures used, which limits comparability across interventions. The quality assessment revealed high-/medium-bias risks in most articles. Future research should include higher quality studies driven by theoretical models. The results support the need for more research on parental involvement in the education of children with disabilities, especially intervention studies within the context of low- and medium-income countries.
促进父母参与学龄残疾儿童教育的干预措施的系统回顾
本研究的目的是系统地绘制和综合有关促进学龄残疾儿童父母参与教育的干预措施的文献。该研究的重点是2000年至2021年间用英语发表的同行评议的初级干预研究。检索了9个数据库,确定并纳入了21篇文章。使用混合方法评估工具评估纳入研究的质量,并使用叙事分析来综合数据。干预的持续时间从7个月到36个月不等。大多数研究是在高收入国家的背景下进行的,重点是智力残疾儿童的父母。大多数研究报告了对一个或多个群体的积极影响:父母、孩子、学校和社区。然而,使用的结果测量存在异质性,这限制了干预措施之间的可比性。质量评估显示大多数文章存在高/中等偏倚风险。未来的研究应包括由理论模型驱动的更高质量的研究。研究结果表明,有必要对父母参与残疾儿童教育进行更多的研究,特别是在中低收入国家进行干预研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信