IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SYSTEM OF HONEY SAFETY CONTROL ON THE EXAMPLE OF ANALYZING OF RESIDUES OF TETRACYCLINE GROUP ANTIBIOTICS

D. Yanovych, Z. Zasadna, M. Rydchuk, S. Plotytsia, S. Kislova, O. Pazderska
{"title":"IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SYSTEM OF HONEY SAFETY CONTROL ON THE EXAMPLE OF ANALYZING OF RESIDUES OF TETRACYCLINE GROUP ANTIBIOTICS","authors":"D. Yanovych, Z. Zasadna, M. Rydchuk, S. Plotytsia, S. Kislova, O. Pazderska","doi":"10.36359/scivp.2023-24-1.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Reference Laboratory of Drug Residues Control has implemented a system of \"classical\" honey safety control based on the parameters of antimicrobial drug residues: samples testing by the screening enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method and, in the case of positive or possibly positive samples occurring, – retesting by confirmatory UPLC-MS/MS multi-method developed in the laboratory. The article presents the results of ELISA screening method validation for the determination of residual amounts of tetracycline group antibiotics (tetracycline, oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline, doxycycline) in honey samples using Tetracyclin® RIDASCREEN test kits by R-Biopharm (Germany) and Oxytetracycline ELISA by EuroProxima (the Netherlands) and its verification by means of the confirmatory method. \nIn accordance with the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/808, the validation of test kits proposed by the manufacturers was carried out taking into account the minimum required limit of detection. The fitness-for-purpose of the methods was confirmed based on the establishment of main validation parameters for screening methods (technical threshold and cut-off factor) using control (blank) and fortified honey samples with standard solutions of tetracycline at the level of ½ of the minimum required limit of detection, according to the \"added-received\" criterion. The proposed methods are the simple in carrying out, time- and cost-effective, which are their main advantages. \nThe reliability of the results obtained by the proposed methods was verified using the developed confirmatory UPLC-MS/MS multi-method. The results of comparative studies of control (blank) honey samples and fortified with a standard solution of tetracycline antibiotics at the level of 2.5 and 5.0 μg/kg, as well as the results of the interlaboratory testing with the accredited laboratory (Germany) are presented.","PeriodicalId":21617,"journal":{"name":"Scientific and Technical Bulletin оf State Scientific Research Control Institute of Veterinary Medical Products and Fodder Additives аnd Institute of Animal Biology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific and Technical Bulletin оf State Scientific Research Control Institute of Veterinary Medical Products and Fodder Additives аnd Institute of Animal Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36359/scivp.2023-24-1.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The National Reference Laboratory of Drug Residues Control has implemented a system of "classical" honey safety control based on the parameters of antimicrobial drug residues: samples testing by the screening enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method and, in the case of positive or possibly positive samples occurring, – retesting by confirmatory UPLC-MS/MS multi-method developed in the laboratory. The article presents the results of ELISA screening method validation for the determination of residual amounts of tetracycline group antibiotics (tetracycline, oxytetracycline, chlortetracycline, doxycycline) in honey samples using Tetracyclin® RIDASCREEN test kits by R-Biopharm (Germany) and Oxytetracycline ELISA by EuroProxima (the Netherlands) and its verification by means of the confirmatory method. In accordance with the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/808, the validation of test kits proposed by the manufacturers was carried out taking into account the minimum required limit of detection. The fitness-for-purpose of the methods was confirmed based on the establishment of main validation parameters for screening methods (technical threshold and cut-off factor) using control (blank) and fortified honey samples with standard solutions of tetracycline at the level of ½ of the minimum required limit of detection, according to the "added-received" criterion. The proposed methods are the simple in carrying out, time- and cost-effective, which are their main advantages. The reliability of the results obtained by the proposed methods was verified using the developed confirmatory UPLC-MS/MS multi-method. The results of comparative studies of control (blank) honey samples and fortified with a standard solution of tetracycline antibiotics at the level of 2.5 and 5.0 μg/kg, as well as the results of the interlaboratory testing with the accredited laboratory (Germany) are presented.
以四环素类抗生素残留分析为例,实施蜂蜜安全控制体系
国家药物残留控制参考实验室实施了一套基于抗菌药物残留参数的“经典”蜂蜜安全控制系统:通过筛选酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)方法对样品进行检测,在样品呈阳性或可能呈阳性的情况下,通过实验室开发的验证性UPLC-MS/MS多方法进行重新检测。本文介绍了采用德国R-Biopharm公司的tetracycline®RIDASCREEN检测试剂盒和荷兰EuroProxima公司的oxytetracycline ELISA检测蜂蜜样品中四环素类抗生素(四环素、土霉素、金霉素、多西环素)残留量的ELISA筛选方法验证结果,并采用验证法进行验证。根据欧盟委员会实施法规(EU) 2021/808,制造商提出的测试试剂盒的验证已考虑到最低要求的检测限。通过建立筛选方法的主要验证参数(技术阈值和截止因子),根据“添加-接收”标准,使用对照(空白)和强化蜂蜜样品,四环素标准溶液的水平为最低要求检测限的1 / 2,确定了方法的适用性。所提出的方法具有操作简单、省时、经济等优点。采用开发的验证型UPLC-MS/MS多方法验证了方法结果的可靠性。介绍了对照(空白)蜂蜜样品与添加2.5 μg/kg和5.0 μg/kg四环素类抗生素标准溶液的对比研究结果,以及与德国认可实验室的实验室间检测结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信