Understanding Ethics and Human Rights in Smart Information Systems

Macnish Kevin, Ryan Mark, Stahl Bernd
{"title":"Understanding Ethics and Human Rights in Smart Information Systems","authors":"Macnish Kevin,&nbsp;Ryan Mark,&nbsp;Stahl Bernd","doi":"10.29297/orbit.v2i1.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Smart information systems (SIS), systems based in machine learning approaches to artificial intelligence using big data analytics are high profile examples of emerging technologies that have the potential to significantly affect most aspects of personal and societal life in industrialised societies. They are the subject of much scientific research but also of large amount of philosophical and sociological studies. A key question they raise relates to ethical questions they may raise which can involve questions of human rights.</p><p>The majority of these reflective approaches to SIS are based on anecdotal evidence or conceptual considerations. There is little research investigating the actual ethical issues these technologies raise in their real-world environments. Rigorous empirical research tends to focus on particular technologies or application examples. While such research can produce interesting insights, it is not sufficient to give a broader overview of these technologies. One reason is that the technologies and components involved as well as the applications of such SIS vary greatly.</p><p>One way of overcoming this limited view of ethics and human rights of SIS that is based on rigorous empirical research while providing a broad overview of technologies is to undertake a set of parallel case studies that provides simultaneous insights into a range of technologies. This paper outlines the rational and principles according to which such a multiple case study can be undertaken. It describes the process of selection of cases and development of the methodology as represented by a case study protocol. It provides the rationale and methodological underpinning for the set of 10 case studies that are published in the same special section of the ORBIT journal.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101247,"journal":{"name":"The ORBIT Journal","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.29297/orbit.v2i1.102","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The ORBIT Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2515856220300079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Smart information systems (SIS), systems based in machine learning approaches to artificial intelligence using big data analytics are high profile examples of emerging technologies that have the potential to significantly affect most aspects of personal and societal life in industrialised societies. They are the subject of much scientific research but also of large amount of philosophical and sociological studies. A key question they raise relates to ethical questions they may raise which can involve questions of human rights.

The majority of these reflective approaches to SIS are based on anecdotal evidence or conceptual considerations. There is little research investigating the actual ethical issues these technologies raise in their real-world environments. Rigorous empirical research tends to focus on particular technologies or application examples. While such research can produce interesting insights, it is not sufficient to give a broader overview of these technologies. One reason is that the technologies and components involved as well as the applications of such SIS vary greatly.

One way of overcoming this limited view of ethics and human rights of SIS that is based on rigorous empirical research while providing a broad overview of technologies is to undertake a set of parallel case studies that provides simultaneous insights into a range of technologies. This paper outlines the rational and principles according to which such a multiple case study can be undertaken. It describes the process of selection of cases and development of the methodology as represented by a case study protocol. It provides the rationale and methodological underpinning for the set of 10 case studies that are published in the same special section of the ORBIT journal.

理解智能信息系统中的伦理和人权
智能信息系统(SIS),基于机器学习方法的系统,使用大数据分析的人工智能是新兴技术的高调例子,有可能显著影响工业化社会中个人和社会生活的大多数方面。它们是许多科学研究的主题,也是大量哲学和社会学研究的主题。他们提出的一个关键问题与他们可能提出的伦理问题有关,这些问题可能涉及人权问题。大多数对SIS的反思方法都是基于轶事证据或概念考虑。很少有研究调查这些技术在其现实环境中引发的实际伦理问题。严谨的实证研究往往侧重于特定的技术或应用实例。虽然这样的研究可以产生有趣的见解,但它不足以对这些技术进行更广泛的概述。其中一个原因是,这种SIS所涉及的技术和组件以及应用都有很大差异。SIS基于严格的实证研究,同时提供广泛的技术概述,克服这种有限的伦理和人权观点的一种方法是进行一系列平行的案例研究,同时提供对一系列技术的见解。本文概述了进行这种多案例研究的合理性和原则。它描述了案例的选择过程和以案例研究协议为代表的方法论的发展。它为在ORBIT杂志的同一专版上发表的一组10个案例研究提供了基本原理和方法基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信