Neurocognitive Recovery of Sentence Processing in Aphasia.

Q3 Social Sciences
Cynthia K Thompson
{"title":"Neurocognitive Recovery of Sentence Processing in Aphasia.","authors":"Cynthia K Thompson","doi":"10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-RSNP-19-0219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose Reorganization of language networks in aphasia takes advantage of the facts that (a) the brain is an organ of plasticity, with neuronal changes occurring throughout the life span, including following brain damage; (b) plasticity is highly experience dependent; and (c) as with any learning system, language reorganization involves a synergistic interplay between organism-intrinsic (i.e., cognitive and brain) and organism-extrinsic (i.e., environmental) variables. A major goal for clinical treatment of aphasia is to be able to prescribe treatment and predict its outcome based on the neurocognitive deficit profiles of individual patients. This review article summarizes the results of research examining the neurocognitive effects of psycholinguistically based treatment (i.e., Treatment of Underlying Forms; Thompson & Shapiro, 2005) for sentence processing impairments in individuals with chronic agrammatic aphasia resulting from stroke and primary progressive aphasia and addresses both behavioral and brain variables related to successful treatment outcomes. The influences of lesion volume and location, perfusion (blood flow), and resting-state neural activity on language recovery are also discussed as related to recovery of agrammatism and other language impairments. Based on these and other data, principles for promoting neuroplasticity of language networks are presented. Conclusions Sentence processing treatment results in improved comprehension and production of complex syntactic structures in chronic agrammatism and generalization to less complex, linguistically related structures in chronic agrammatism. Patients also show treatment-induced shifts toward normal-like online sentence processing routines (based on eye movement data) and changes in neural recruitment patterns (based on functional neuroimaging), with posttreatment activation of regions overlapping with those within sentence processing and dorsal attention networks engaged by neurotypical adults performing the same task. These findings provide compelling evidence that treatment focused on principles of neuroplasticity promotes neurocognitive recovery in chronic agrammatic aphasia. Presentation Videohttps://doi.org/10.23641/asha.10257587.</p>","PeriodicalId":39340,"journal":{"name":"NASSP Bulletin","volume":"23 1","pages":"3947-3972"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7203523/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NASSP Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-RSNP-19-0219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Reorganization of language networks in aphasia takes advantage of the facts that (a) the brain is an organ of plasticity, with neuronal changes occurring throughout the life span, including following brain damage; (b) plasticity is highly experience dependent; and (c) as with any learning system, language reorganization involves a synergistic interplay between organism-intrinsic (i.e., cognitive and brain) and organism-extrinsic (i.e., environmental) variables. A major goal for clinical treatment of aphasia is to be able to prescribe treatment and predict its outcome based on the neurocognitive deficit profiles of individual patients. This review article summarizes the results of research examining the neurocognitive effects of psycholinguistically based treatment (i.e., Treatment of Underlying Forms; Thompson & Shapiro, 2005) for sentence processing impairments in individuals with chronic agrammatic aphasia resulting from stroke and primary progressive aphasia and addresses both behavioral and brain variables related to successful treatment outcomes. The influences of lesion volume and location, perfusion (blood flow), and resting-state neural activity on language recovery are also discussed as related to recovery of agrammatism and other language impairments. Based on these and other data, principles for promoting neuroplasticity of language networks are presented. Conclusions Sentence processing treatment results in improved comprehension and production of complex syntactic structures in chronic agrammatism and generalization to less complex, linguistically related structures in chronic agrammatism. Patients also show treatment-induced shifts toward normal-like online sentence processing routines (based on eye movement data) and changes in neural recruitment patterns (based on functional neuroimaging), with posttreatment activation of regions overlapping with those within sentence processing and dorsal attention networks engaged by neurotypical adults performing the same task. These findings provide compelling evidence that treatment focused on principles of neuroplasticity promotes neurocognitive recovery in chronic agrammatic aphasia. Presentation Videohttps://doi.org/10.23641/asha.10257587.

失语症患者句子处理的神经认知恢复。
目的 失语症患者语言网络的重组利用了以下事实:(a) 大脑是一个具有可塑性的器官,神经元的变化贯穿人的一生,包括脑损伤后;(b) 可塑性高度依赖于经验;(c) 与任何学习系统一样,语言重组涉及机体内在(即认知和大脑)和机体外在(即环境)变量之间的协同作用。失语症临床治疗的一个主要目标是能够根据个体患者的神经认知缺陷特征制定治疗方案并预测治疗结果。本综述文章总结了基于心理语言学的治疗(即 "基本形式治疗",Thompson & Shapiro, 2005)对中风导致的慢性语法性失语症和原发性进行性失语症患者句子处理障碍的神经认知影响的研究成果,并探讨了与成功治疗结果相关的行为和大脑变量。此外,还讨论了病变体积和位置、灌注(血流)和静息状态神经活动对语言恢复的影响,这些都与语法障碍和其他语言障碍的恢复有关。根据这些数据和其他数据,提出了促进语言网络神经可塑性的原则。结论 句子处理治疗可提高慢性语法障碍患者对复杂句法结构的理解和表达能力,并可将慢性语法障碍患者的句子泛化为不太复杂的语言相关结构。患者还表现出治疗诱导的类似正常在线句子处理程序的转变(基于眼动数据)和神经招募模式的变化(基于功能神经影像学),治疗后激活的区域与神经畸形成人执行相同任务时句子处理和背侧注意力网络中的区域重叠。这些发现提供了令人信服的证据,证明以神经可塑性原则为重点的治疗可促进慢性语篇性失语症患者的神经认知恢复。演讲视频https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.10257587。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NASSP Bulletin
NASSP Bulletin Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信