Taking Notes on Informational Source Text Using Text Structures: An Intervention for Fourth Grade Students with Learning Difficulties

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Michael A. Hebert, J. Bohatý, J. R. Nelson, Julia V. Roehling, K. Christensen
{"title":"Taking Notes on Informational Source Text Using Text Structures: An Intervention for Fourth Grade Students with Learning Difficulties","authors":"Michael A. Hebert, J. Bohatý, J. R. Nelson, Julia V. Roehling, K. Christensen","doi":"10.18666/LDMJ-2018-V23-I2-9048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Students with writing difficulties may have difficulty when writing informational text with source material due to a) inexperience with such text and b) difficulties reading and understanding source material. Teaching students to take notes related to informational text using text structures (e.g., description, compare/contrast) may help them access source text and improve planning and organization of their ideas. Two pilot studies examining the usability, feasibility, and promise of a note-taking and text structure intervention are presented in this manuscript. In study 1, the researchers employed a multiple-probe design across three 4th grade participants with reading difficulties. In study 2, the researchers employed an underpowered experimental design, comparing the intervention to a narrative-based reading and writing strategies. Fidelity of implementation was acceptable to high in both studies, indicating preservice teachers find it useable and it is feasible to implement the lessons within the 30-minute time frame. However, there were mixed results of the intervention on note-taking outcomes. In study 1, a functional relation was demonstrated for two of three participants for the note-taking measure. In study 2, the intervention group did not statistically outperform the control group on the note-taking measure, but there was a non-significant effect size of 0.75 between the groups. The findings, though mixed, warrant further study of the intervention in a fully powered study. Results on reading outcomes for both studies are also discussed.  Subscribe to LDMJ","PeriodicalId":42442,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"45 1","pages":"34-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2018-V23-I2-9048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Students with writing difficulties may have difficulty when writing informational text with source material due to a) inexperience with such text and b) difficulties reading and understanding source material. Teaching students to take notes related to informational text using text structures (e.g., description, compare/contrast) may help them access source text and improve planning and organization of their ideas. Two pilot studies examining the usability, feasibility, and promise of a note-taking and text structure intervention are presented in this manuscript. In study 1, the researchers employed a multiple-probe design across three 4th grade participants with reading difficulties. In study 2, the researchers employed an underpowered experimental design, comparing the intervention to a narrative-based reading and writing strategies. Fidelity of implementation was acceptable to high in both studies, indicating preservice teachers find it useable and it is feasible to implement the lessons within the 30-minute time frame. However, there were mixed results of the intervention on note-taking outcomes. In study 1, a functional relation was demonstrated for two of three participants for the note-taking measure. In study 2, the intervention group did not statistically outperform the control group on the note-taking measure, but there was a non-significant effect size of 0.75 between the groups. The findings, though mixed, warrant further study of the intervention in a fully powered study. Results on reading outcomes for both studies are also discussed.  Subscribe to LDMJ
运用篇章结构对信息源文本进行笔记:对四年级学习困难学生的干预
有写作困难的学生在用原始材料写信息文本时可能会遇到困难,原因有:a)对这些文本缺乏经验;b)阅读和理解原始材料有困难。教学生使用文本结构(如描述、比较/对比)来做与信息文本相关的笔记,可以帮助他们访问源文本,提高他们对想法的规划和组织。两个试点研究检查的可用性,可行性和承诺的笔记和文本结构干预提出了这个手稿。在研究1中,研究人员对三名有阅读困难的四年级学生采用了多探针设计。在研究2中,研究人员采用了低功率实验设计,将干预与基于叙事的阅读和写作策略进行比较。两项研究的实施保真度均可接受至高,表明职前教师认为在30分钟的时间框架内实施课程是可行的。然而,对笔记结果的干预结果好坏参半。在研究1中,三个参与者中有两个参与者的笔记测量显示了函数关系。在研究2中,干预组在笔记测量上没有统计学上优于对照组,但两组之间存在0.75的非显著效应量。研究结果虽然好坏参半,但值得进一步的研究,在一个充分有力的研究干预。本文还讨论了两项研究的阅读结果。订阅LDMJ
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
6.20%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信