Financial Engineering Estimation Methods of Minimum Risk Hedge Ratio

Zheng Yao, Haiyan Wu
{"title":"Financial Engineering Estimation Methods of Minimum Risk Hedge Ratio","authors":"Zheng Yao,&nbsp;Haiyan Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.sepro.2011.10.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As an important tool to circumvent the systemic risks in financial engineering, the key for achievement of the performance of stock index futures is dependent on determination of the hedge ratio (HR). In this paper, the minimum risk-based portfolio hedging model is first analyzed. It is then followed by the investigation on various major estimation methods for the minimum risk hedge ratio. Aiming at the newest Shanghai and Shenzhen (HS) 300 index futures hedge, the empirical analyses are eventually performed for the hedge strategies, thus validating the application of these different estimation methods in China's market. The results revealed in the current study show that the HR obtained by the ordinary least squares (OLS) model is maximal and the out-of-sample hedging performance is the best; however, the hedging effectiveness is not sufficiently stable for both the out-of-sample and in-sample estimation. In addition, the in-sample hedging performance accomplished through the bivariate vector autoregression (B-VAR) model is superior to those achieved via other methods. It is manifested further from the results that the HR determined by the error correction (EC) model is minimal and the hedging performances for both the out-of-sample and in-sample data are weak, yet the hedging effectiveness for both of them is stable.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101207,"journal":{"name":"Systems Engineering Procedia","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 187-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.sepro.2011.10.027","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems Engineering Procedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211381911001160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an important tool to circumvent the systemic risks in financial engineering, the key for achievement of the performance of stock index futures is dependent on determination of the hedge ratio (HR). In this paper, the minimum risk-based portfolio hedging model is first analyzed. It is then followed by the investigation on various major estimation methods for the minimum risk hedge ratio. Aiming at the newest Shanghai and Shenzhen (HS) 300 index futures hedge, the empirical analyses are eventually performed for the hedge strategies, thus validating the application of these different estimation methods in China's market. The results revealed in the current study show that the HR obtained by the ordinary least squares (OLS) model is maximal and the out-of-sample hedging performance is the best; however, the hedging effectiveness is not sufficiently stable for both the out-of-sample and in-sample estimation. In addition, the in-sample hedging performance accomplished through the bivariate vector autoregression (B-VAR) model is superior to those achieved via other methods. It is manifested further from the results that the HR determined by the error correction (EC) model is minimal and the hedging performances for both the out-of-sample and in-sample data are weak, yet the hedging effectiveness for both of them is stable.

最小风险对冲比率的金融工程估计方法
股指期货作为金融工程中规避系统性风险的重要工具,其对冲比率的确定是实现股指期货绩效的关键。本文首先分析了基于最小风险的投资组合对冲模型。然后对最小风险对冲比率的各种主要估计方法进行了研究。最后以最新的沪深300指数期货套期保值为对象,对套期保值策略进行实证分析,从而验证这些不同估计方法在中国市场上的应用。研究结果表明:普通最小二乘(OLS)模型得到的HR最大,样本外对冲效果最好;然而,无论是样本外估计还是样本内估计,套期保值效果都不够稳定。此外,通过二元向量自回归(B-VAR)模型实现的样本内对冲绩效优于其他方法。结果进一步表明,由误差校正(EC)模型确定的HR最小,对样本外和样本内数据的套期保值性能较弱,但对两者的套期保值效果稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信