Acute toxicity of the water-soluble fraction of coal tar to the tiger prawn, penaeus monodon

John C. Chapman , Niall A.L. Johnston , Peter F. Nelson , R. Meenatchi Sunderam , Geoffrey B. Thompson
{"title":"Acute toxicity of the water-soluble fraction of coal tar to the tiger prawn, penaeus monodon","authors":"John C. Chapman ,&nbsp;Niall A.L. Johnston ,&nbsp;Peter F. Nelson ,&nbsp;R. Meenatchi Sunderam ,&nbsp;Geoffrey B. Thompson","doi":"10.1016/S0269-8579(05)80004-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When coal tar is transported by sea it is categorized under International Maritime Organisation (IMO) guidelines for noxious liquids, by toxicity as well as other properties. Previous toxicity assessments are available for freshwater animals only, however, and are misleading because they were reported as nominal measures of the amount of coal tar added to the dilution water. Not all of this coal tar will enter solution, and if the data are corrected to measured concentrations of total organic carbon in solution, the true LC50 values are an order of magnitude less. Even lower values may be obtained by exposing the animals to whole coal tar in addition to the water-soluble fraction (WSF), but the concentration of whole coal tar in water cannot be measured accurately. It is recommended that such toxicity assessments should rely on measured values for WSF alone, and marine test values are reported here for the tiger prawn Penaeus monodon. The WSF was analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) to obtain 96-h LC50 values of 3·1 mg/litre total organics and 2·5 mg/litre total organic carbon.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100982,"journal":{"name":"Oil and Chemical Pollution","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0269-8579(05)80004-8","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oil and Chemical Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269857905800048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

When coal tar is transported by sea it is categorized under International Maritime Organisation (IMO) guidelines for noxious liquids, by toxicity as well as other properties. Previous toxicity assessments are available for freshwater animals only, however, and are misleading because they were reported as nominal measures of the amount of coal tar added to the dilution water. Not all of this coal tar will enter solution, and if the data are corrected to measured concentrations of total organic carbon in solution, the true LC50 values are an order of magnitude less. Even lower values may be obtained by exposing the animals to whole coal tar in addition to the water-soluble fraction (WSF), but the concentration of whole coal tar in water cannot be measured accurately. It is recommended that such toxicity assessments should rely on measured values for WSF alone, and marine test values are reported here for the tiger prawn Penaeus monodon. The WSF was analysed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) to obtain 96-h LC50 values of 3·1 mg/litre total organics and 2·5 mg/litre total organic carbon.

煤焦油水溶性部分对虎对虾的急性毒性
当煤焦油通过海上运输时,根据毒性和其他性质,根据国际海事组织(IMO)的有毒液体指南进行分类。然而,以前的毒性评估只适用于淡水动物,并且具有误导性,因为它们被报告为添加到稀释水中的煤焦油量的标称测量。并不是所有的煤焦油都会进入溶液,如果将数据修正为溶液中总有机碳的测量浓度,那么真实的LC50值要小一个数量级。通过将动物暴露于除水溶性部分(WSF)外的全煤焦油中,甚至可以获得更低的值,但不能准确测量水中全煤焦油的浓度。建议此类毒性评估应仅依赖WSF的测量值,此处报告了虎对虾(Penaeus monodon)的海洋测试值。采用气相色谱-质谱(GC/MS)对WSF进行分析,得到96 h LC50值为3.1 mg/l总有机碳和2.5 mg/l总有机碳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信