Addressing the Alien in the Room: Why Public Perception is Imperative to the Field of Archaeology

C. Fender
{"title":"Addressing the Alien in the Room: Why Public Perception is Imperative to the Field of Archaeology","authors":"C. Fender","doi":"10.29173/pathways38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pseudoscience in archaeology, or pseudoarchaeology, are ideas formed by distrust, with minimal observable evidence that explain the human past. In a world of widespread, accessible misinformation, researchers often dismiss the ideas presented within pseudoscientific theory as laughable or irrelevant. On the contrary, many of these thoughts are supported by and for colonialist or racist agendas. With popular media throughout North America now supporting pseudoarchaeology, misinformation is beginning to take a hold on public perception of the field of archaeology. To explore this influence further, this paper summarizes the origins and thoughts presented within popular pseudoarchaeology, current public understanding of archaeology, and why this matters to archaeologists. This paper primarily considers how archaeology is portrayed in Canada and the United States, although I use additional international examples to underscore the importance of global public engagement and media influences within the field of archaeology. Stressing the lack of accurate representation of archaeology, especially regarding the representation of Indigenous peoples, provides an invitation to strive for public engagement and honest discourse about the field.","PeriodicalId":83847,"journal":{"name":"Pathways (Chestnut Hill, Mass.)","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathways (Chestnut Hill, Mass.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/pathways38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pseudoscience in archaeology, or pseudoarchaeology, are ideas formed by distrust, with minimal observable evidence that explain the human past. In a world of widespread, accessible misinformation, researchers often dismiss the ideas presented within pseudoscientific theory as laughable or irrelevant. On the contrary, many of these thoughts are supported by and for colonialist or racist agendas. With popular media throughout North America now supporting pseudoarchaeology, misinformation is beginning to take a hold on public perception of the field of archaeology. To explore this influence further, this paper summarizes the origins and thoughts presented within popular pseudoarchaeology, current public understanding of archaeology, and why this matters to archaeologists. This paper primarily considers how archaeology is portrayed in Canada and the United States, although I use additional international examples to underscore the importance of global public engagement and media influences within the field of archaeology. Stressing the lack of accurate representation of archaeology, especially regarding the representation of Indigenous peoples, provides an invitation to strive for public engagement and honest discourse about the field.
称呼房间里的外星人:为什么公众感知对考古学领域至关重要
考古学中的伪科学,或称伪考古学,是由于不信任而形成的观点,很少有可观察到的证据可以解释人类的过去。在一个到处都是可获得的错误信息的世界里,研究人员经常把伪科学理论中提出的观点视为可笑或无关紧要。相反,其中许多思想得到殖民主义或种族主义议程的支持。随着北美的大众媒体现在支持伪考古学,错误信息开始控制公众对考古学领域的看法。为了进一步探索这种影响,本文总结了流行的伪考古学的起源和思想,当前公众对考古学的理解,以及为什么这对考古学家很重要。本文主要考虑了考古学是如何在加拿大和美国被描绘出来的,尽管我使用了额外的国际例子来强调全球公众参与和媒体在考古学领域的影响的重要性。强调考古学缺乏准确的代表性,特别是在土著人民的代表性方面,这为争取公众参与和对该领域的诚实讨论提供了一个邀请。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书