Ultrasonography Knowledge and Practices among Obstetrics/Gynecology Practitioners; A Nationwide Survey in Jordan

Omayyah Dar-Odeh, M. Illa, Samih Abdeljawad, O. Abu-Hammad, Raghad Abdeljawad, Rua'a Abdeljawad, Farhan Alkouz, N. Dar-Odeh
{"title":"Ultrasonography Knowledge and Practices among Obstetrics/Gynecology Practitioners; A Nationwide Survey in Jordan","authors":"Omayyah Dar-Odeh, M. Illa, Samih Abdeljawad, O. Abu-Hammad, Raghad Abdeljawad, Rua'a Abdeljawad, Farhan Alkouz, N. Dar-Odeh","doi":"10.1515/openhe-2022-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: Ultrasonography is an indispensable tool in obstetric practice. This study aims to assess the ultrasonography-related knowledge, practices, and training aspects of Jordanian Obstetrics/Gynecology (OB/GYN) practitioners. This cross-sectional study was conducted in Jordan between September 2019 and January 2021 among OB/GYN medical practitioners. The study tool was based on a questionnaire composed of 25 closed-ended questions on demographic data and ultrasonography-related knowledge, practices, and training. Results: A total of 197 practitioners participated, and these were mostly female (N=126, 64.0%) and specialist (N=156, 79.2%). Most participants had sufficient knowledge on timing of detailed fetal scans (78.7%), nuchal translucency scans (89.3%) and aneuploidy markers (74%); these participants were mostly female (P=0.000, P= 0.04, respectively). On the other hand, insufficient knowledge was noted on other aspects, including the as-low-as-reasonably-achievable (ALARA) principle (25.9%) and meaning of the terms thermal index (25.4%) and mechanical index (23.9%), with no gender differences found. Only 45.2% of participants attended ultra-sonography workshops in the past 2 years, and the attendees were mainly female (P=0.016). Regression analysis indicated that attending training courses on ultrasonography within past 2 years and routine practice of requesting detailed fetal scans between 18 and 22 weeks were the only significant predictor variables for high knowledge scores (P=0.002 and < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Educational courses on ultrasound safety and practices are warranted for OB/GYN practitioners working in Jordan, especially for male practitioners. Revising undergraduate medical curricula and increasing the number of qualified specialists in maternal-fetal medicine may be necessary, particularly in aspects relating to the introduction of advanced ultrasound physics and practice.","PeriodicalId":74349,"journal":{"name":"Open health data","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open health data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/openhe-2022-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Ultrasonography is an indispensable tool in obstetric practice. This study aims to assess the ultrasonography-related knowledge, practices, and training aspects of Jordanian Obstetrics/Gynecology (OB/GYN) practitioners. This cross-sectional study was conducted in Jordan between September 2019 and January 2021 among OB/GYN medical practitioners. The study tool was based on a questionnaire composed of 25 closed-ended questions on demographic data and ultrasonography-related knowledge, practices, and training. Results: A total of 197 practitioners participated, and these were mostly female (N=126, 64.0%) and specialist (N=156, 79.2%). Most participants had sufficient knowledge on timing of detailed fetal scans (78.7%), nuchal translucency scans (89.3%) and aneuploidy markers (74%); these participants were mostly female (P=0.000, P= 0.04, respectively). On the other hand, insufficient knowledge was noted on other aspects, including the as-low-as-reasonably-achievable (ALARA) principle (25.9%) and meaning of the terms thermal index (25.4%) and mechanical index (23.9%), with no gender differences found. Only 45.2% of participants attended ultra-sonography workshops in the past 2 years, and the attendees were mainly female (P=0.016). Regression analysis indicated that attending training courses on ultrasonography within past 2 years and routine practice of requesting detailed fetal scans between 18 and 22 weeks were the only significant predictor variables for high knowledge scores (P=0.002 and < 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Educational courses on ultrasound safety and practices are warranted for OB/GYN practitioners working in Jordan, especially for male practitioners. Revising undergraduate medical curricula and increasing the number of qualified specialists in maternal-fetal medicine may be necessary, particularly in aspects relating to the introduction of advanced ultrasound physics and practice.
妇产科医师超声检查知识与实践约旦的一项全国性调查
背景:超声检查是产科实践中不可缺少的工具。本研究旨在评估约旦妇产科(OB/GYN)从业人员的超声相关知识、实践和培训情况。这项横断面研究于2019年9月至2021年1月在约旦的妇产科医生中进行。研究工具是基于一份由25个封闭式问题组成的调查问卷,内容涉及人口统计数据和超声相关知识、实践和培训。结果:共197名执业医师参与调查,其中以女性126人(占64.0%)和专科156人(占79.2%)居多。大多数参与者对详细胎儿扫描(78.7%)、颈部半透明扫描(89.3%)和非整倍体标记(74%)的时间有足够的了解;这些参与者以女性居多(P=0.000, P= 0.04)。另一方面,在其他方面的知识不足,包括最低合理可达(ALARA)原则(25.9%)和术语热指数(25.4%)和机械指数(23.9%)的含义,没有发现性别差异。过去2年参加超声工作坊的人数仅占45.2%,且以女性为主(P=0.016)。回归分析显示,过去2年内参加超声培训课程和常规要求18 ~ 22周胎儿详细扫描是高知识得分的唯一显著预测变量(P分别=0.002和< 0.001)。结论:对于在约旦工作的妇产科医生,特别是男性医生,有必要进行超声安全和操作的教育课程。修订本科医学课程和增加母胎医学合格专家的数量可能是必要的,特别是在介绍先进超声物理和实践方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信