Risk Assessment for Carcinogens: A Comparison of Approaches of the ACGIH and the EPA

M. Alavanja, Charles C. Brown, R. Spirtas, Manuel R. Gómez
{"title":"Risk Assessment for Carcinogens: A Comparison of Approaches of the ACGIH and the EPA","authors":"M. Alavanja, Charles C. Brown, R. Spirtas, Manuel R. Gómez","doi":"10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The relative carcinogenic potency of 16 chemicals evaluated by both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Chemical Substances Threshold Limit Values (CS-TLV) Committee of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) were compared. The estimated cancer risk resulting from occupational exposure to the threshold limit values (TLVs) were also computed using dose-response curves developed as a part of EPA quantitative risk assessments. Substantial agreement between the EPA and the CS-TLV Committee was found when the relative potency of these carcinogens was compared. Use of EPA's risk model to estimate lifetime cancer risk from occupational exposure at the TLV levels often resulted in high cancer risk estimates. The approaches used to assess cancer risk by both groups is described and a suggestion is made for incorporating existing quantitative risk assessments into the TLV evaluation procedure.","PeriodicalId":8182,"journal":{"name":"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene","volume":"190 1","pages":"510-517"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied occupational and environmental hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1047322X.1990.10389685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract The relative carcinogenic potency of 16 chemicals evaluated by both the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Chemical Substances Threshold Limit Values (CS-TLV) Committee of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) were compared. The estimated cancer risk resulting from occupational exposure to the threshold limit values (TLVs) were also computed using dose-response curves developed as a part of EPA quantitative risk assessments. Substantial agreement between the EPA and the CS-TLV Committee was found when the relative potency of these carcinogens was compared. Use of EPA's risk model to estimate lifetime cancer risk from occupational exposure at the TLV levels often resulted in high cancer risk estimates. The approaches used to assess cancer risk by both groups is described and a suggestion is made for incorporating existing quantitative risk assessments into the TLV evaluation procedure.
致癌物风险评估:ACGIH和EPA方法的比较
摘要比较了美国环境保护署(EPA)和美国政府工业卫生学家会议(ACGIH)化学物质阈值委员会(CS-TLV)评估的16种化学物质的相对致癌效力。职业暴露于阈限值(TLVs)导致的估计癌症风险也使用作为EPA定量风险评估的一部分制定的剂量-反应曲线进行计算。当比较这些致癌物的相对效力时,发现EPA和CS-TLV委员会之间存在实质性的一致。使用EPA的风险模型来估计职业暴露在TLV水平下的终生癌症风险通常会导致高癌症风险估计。描述了两组用于评估癌症风险的方法,并建议将现有的定量风险评估纳入TLV评估程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信