Additional Treatment Using Transcatheter Arterial Infusion with Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Contributes to Prolonged Survival of Patients with BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Discontinuing Lenvatinib: Preliminary Study
T. Ishikawa, Saori Endo, M. Imai, Motoi Azumi, Yujiro Nozawa, Tomoe Sano, A. Iwanaga, T. Honma, Toshiaki Yoshida
{"title":"Additional Treatment Using Transcatheter Arterial Infusion with Drug-Eluting Beads Transarterial Chemoembolization Contributes to Prolonged Survival of Patients with BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Discontinuing Lenvatinib: Preliminary Study","authors":"T. Ishikawa, Saori Endo, M. Imai, Motoi Azumi, Yujiro Nozawa, Tomoe Sano, A. Iwanaga, T. Honma, Toshiaki Yoshida","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2020.08.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Lenvatinib is considered the first-line treatment for unresectable advanced hepatocellular\ncarcinoma (HCC); however, in some clinical cases, discontinuation of lenvatinib is unavoidable. It is\nimportant to elucidate if transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) with drug-eluting beads transarterial\nchemoembolization (DEB-TACE) is a feasible second-line treatment after discontinuing lenvatinib. In this\nstudy, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, hepatic function and nutritional status associated with TAI with\nDEB-TACE for patients who previously discontinued lenvatinib.\nMaterials and Methods: We included 35 patients who were prescribed lenvatinib for unresectable HCC\nbetween July 2018 and December 2019, of whom 12 discontinued lenvatinib during the study. The changes\nin the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score before and after\ndiscontinuing lenvatinib were examined. Furthermore, the tolerability and survival of patients treated using\nTAI with DEB-TACE as a second-line treatment were analysed.\nResults: The ALBI and CONUT scores were significantly worse when lenvatinib was started and stopped\n(p<0.05). The CONUT score was significantly worse in the second-line group than in the follow-up group\nwhen beginning and discontinuing lenvatinib; however, this score tended to improve after DEB-TACE. The\ngroup that underwent TAI with DEB-TACE as a second-line treatment had significantly better survival than\nthe follow-up group (log‑rank test, p=0.029; generalized Wilcoxon test, p=0.042).\nConclusion: In patients who could undergo TAI with DEB-TACE as a second-line treatment after\ndiscontinuing lenvatinib, the CONUT score improved, while the ALBI score was maintained and welltolerated; these scores may have contributed to improved survival compared with follow-up patients. Future\nstudies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm our findings.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2020.08.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Lenvatinib is considered the first-line treatment for unresectable advanced hepatocellular
carcinoma (HCC); however, in some clinical cases, discontinuation of lenvatinib is unavoidable. It is
important to elucidate if transcatheter arterial infusion (TAI) with drug-eluting beads transarterial
chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) is a feasible second-line treatment after discontinuing lenvatinib. In this
study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy, hepatic function and nutritional status associated with TAI with
DEB-TACE for patients who previously discontinued lenvatinib.
Materials and Methods: We included 35 patients who were prescribed lenvatinib for unresectable HCC
between July 2018 and December 2019, of whom 12 discontinued lenvatinib during the study. The changes
in the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score before and after
discontinuing lenvatinib were examined. Furthermore, the tolerability and survival of patients treated using
TAI with DEB-TACE as a second-line treatment were analysed.
Results: The ALBI and CONUT scores were significantly worse when lenvatinib was started and stopped
(p<0.05). The CONUT score was significantly worse in the second-line group than in the follow-up group
when beginning and discontinuing lenvatinib; however, this score tended to improve after DEB-TACE. The
group that underwent TAI with DEB-TACE as a second-line treatment had significantly better survival than
the follow-up group (log‑rank test, p=0.029; generalized Wilcoxon test, p=0.042).
Conclusion: In patients who could undergo TAI with DEB-TACE as a second-line treatment after
discontinuing lenvatinib, the CONUT score improved, while the ALBI score was maintained and welltolerated; these scores may have contributed to improved survival compared with follow-up patients. Future
studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm our findings.