The Put It Out Project (POP) Facebook Intervention for Young Sexual and Gender Minority Smokers: Outcomes of a Pilot, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

IF 1.8 4区化学 Q3 POLYMER SCIENCE

Designed Monomers and Polymers Pub Date : 2020-08-24 DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntz184

Erin A Vogel, Danielle E Ramo, Meredith C Meacham, Judith J Prochaska, Kevin L Delucchi, Gary L Humfleet

{"title":"The Put It Out Project (POP) Facebook Intervention for Young Sexual and Gender Minority Smokers: Outcomes of a Pilot, Randomized, Controlled Trial.","authors":"Erin A Vogel, Danielle E Ramo, Meredith C Meacham, Judith J Prochaska, Kevin L Delucchi, Gary L Humfleet","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntz184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This trial investigated whether a Facebook smoking cessation intervention culturally tailored to young sexual and gender minority (SGM) smokers (versus non-tailored) would increase smoking abstinence.Methods: Participants were 165 SGM young adult US smokers (age 18-25) recruited from Facebook in April 2018 and randomized to an SGM-tailored (POP; N = 84) or non-tailored (TSP-SGM; N = 81) intervention. Interventions delivered weekly live counseling sessions and 90 daily Facebook posts to participants in Facebook groups. Primary analyses compared POP and TSP-SGM on biochemically verified smoking abstinence (yes/no; primary outcome), self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence (yes/no), reduction in cigarettes per week by 50+% from baseline (yes/no), making a quit attempt during treatment (yes/no), and stage of change (precontemplation/contemplation vs. preparation/action). Supplemental analyses compared POP to two historical control groups.Results: POP participants were more likely than TSP-SGM participants to report smoking abstinence at 3 (23.8% vs. 12.3%; OR = 2.50; p = .03) and 6 months (34.5% vs. 12.3%; OR = 4.06; p < .001) and reduction in smoking at 3 months (52.4% vs. 39.5%; OR = 2.11; p = .03). Biochemically verified smoking abstinence did not significantly differ between POP and TSP-SGM at 3 (OR = 2.00; p = .33) or 6 months (OR = 3.12; p = .08), potentially due to challenges with remote biochemical verification. In supplemental analyses, POP participants were more likely to report abstinence at 3 (OR = 6.82, p = .01) and 6 (OR = 2.75, p = .03) months and reduced smoking at 3 months (OR = 2.72, p = .01) than participants who received a referral to Smokefree.gov.Conclusions: This pilot study provides preliminary support for the effectiveness of a Facebook smoking cessation intervention tailored to SGM young adults.Implications: SGM individuals have disproportionately high smoking prevalence. It is unclear whether smoking cessation interventions culturally tailored to the SGM community are more effective than non-tailored interventions. This pilot trial found preliminary evidence that an SGM-tailored Facebook smoking cessation intervention increased reported abstinence from smoking, compared to a non-tailored intervention.Trial registration: NCT03259360.","PeriodicalId":11170,"journal":{"name":"Designed Monomers and Polymers","volume":"1 1","pages":"1614-1621"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/ntr/ntz184","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Designed Monomers and Polymers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntz184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLYMER SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 27

Abstract

Introduction: This trial investigated whether a Facebook smoking cessation intervention culturally tailored to young sexual and gender minority (SGM) smokers (versus non-tailored) would increase smoking abstinence.

Methods: Participants were 165 SGM young adult US smokers (age 18-25) recruited from Facebook in April 2018 and randomized to an SGM-tailored (POP; N = 84) or non-tailored (TSP-SGM; N = 81) intervention. Interventions delivered weekly live counseling sessions and 90 daily Facebook posts to participants in Facebook groups. Primary analyses compared POP and TSP-SGM on biochemically verified smoking abstinence (yes/no; primary outcome), self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence (yes/no), reduction in cigarettes per week by 50+% from baseline (yes/no), making a quit attempt during treatment (yes/no), and stage of change (precontemplation/contemplation vs. preparation/action). Supplemental analyses compared POP to two historical control groups.

Results: POP participants were more likely than TSP-SGM participants to report smoking abstinence at 3 (23.8% vs. 12.3%; OR = 2.50; p = .03) and 6 months (34.5% vs. 12.3%; OR = 4.06; p < .001) and reduction in smoking at 3 months (52.4% vs. 39.5%; OR = 2.11; p = .03). Biochemically verified smoking abstinence did not significantly differ between POP and TSP-SGM at 3 (OR = 2.00; p = .33) or 6 months (OR = 3.12; p = .08), potentially due to challenges with remote biochemical verification. In supplemental analyses, POP participants were more likely to report abstinence at 3 (OR = 6.82, p = .01) and 6 (OR = 2.75, p = .03) months and reduced smoking at 3 months (OR = 2.72, p = .01) than participants who received a referral to Smokefree.gov.

Conclusions: This pilot study provides preliminary support for the effectiveness of a Facebook smoking cessation intervention tailored to SGM young adults.

Implications: SGM individuals have disproportionately high smoking prevalence. It is unclear whether smoking cessation interventions culturally tailored to the SGM community are more effective than non-tailored interventions. This pilot trial found preliminary evidence that an SGM-tailored Facebook smoking cessation intervention increased reported abstinence from smoking, compared to a non-tailored intervention.

Trial registration: NCT03259360.

查看原文本刊更多论文

把它放出来项目(POP) Facebook干预年轻性和性别少数吸烟者:一项试点，随机，对照试验的结果。

本试验调查了针对年轻性取向和性别少数群体(SGM)吸烟者(与非定制吸烟者相比)的Facebook戒烟干预是否会增加戒烟。方法:参与者是2018年4月从Facebook招募的165名SGM美国年轻成年吸烟者(18-25岁)，并随机分为SGM量身定制(POP;N = 84)或非定制(TSP-SGM;N = 81)干预。干预措施每周向Facebook小组的参与者提供现场咨询会议和90个Facebook帖子。初步分析比较了POP和TSP-SGM在生化验证的戒烟情况(是/否;主要结果)，自我报告的7天点流行戒断(是/否)，每周从基线减少50%以上的香烟(是/否)，在治疗期间戒烟尝试(是/否)，以及改变阶段(预考虑/考虑vs准备/行动)。补充分析将POP与两个历史对照组进行比较。结果:POP参与者比TSP-SGM参与者更有可能报告戒烟，分别为23.8%和12.3%;Or = 2.50;P = .03)和6个月(34.5% vs. 12.3%;Or = 4.06;P < 0.001)和3个月时吸烟减少(52.4% vs. 39.5%;Or = 2.11;P = .03)。经生化验证，POP与TSP-SGM在3时无显著差异(OR = 2.00;p = 0.33)或6个月(or = 3.12;P = .08)，可能是由于远程生化验证的挑战。在补充分析中，与接受无烟网站推荐的参与者相比，POP参与者在3个月(OR = 6.82, p = 0.01)和6个月(OR = 2.75, p = 0.03)时更有可能报告戒烟，并在3个月时减少吸烟(OR = 2.72, p = 0.01)。结论:该试点研究为针对SGM年轻人量身定制的Facebook戒烟干预的有效性提供了初步支持。意义:SGM个体的吸烟率高得不成比例。目前尚不清楚为SGM社区量身定制的戒烟干预措施是否比非量身定制的干预措施更有效。该试点试验发现初步证据表明，与非定制干预相比，sgm定制的Facebook戒烟干预增加了报告的戒烟率。试验注册:NCT03259360。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Designed Monomers and Polymers 化学-高分子科学

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

2.1 months

期刊介绍： Designed Monomers and Polymers ( DMP) publishes prompt peer-reviewed papers and short topical reviews on all areas of macromolecular design and applications. Emphasis is placed on the preparations of new monomers, including characterization and applications. Experiments should be presented in sufficient detail (including specific observations, precautionary notes, use of new materials, techniques, and their possible problems) that they could be reproduced by any researcher wishing to repeat the work. The journal also includes macromolecular design of polymeric materials (such as polymeric biomaterials, biomedical polymers, etc.) with medical applications. DMP provides an interface between organic and polymer chemistries and aims to bridge the gap between monomer synthesis and the design of new polymers. Submssions are invited in the areas including, but not limited to: -macromolecular science, initiators, macroinitiators for macromolecular design -kinetics, mechanism and modelling aspects of polymerization -new methods of synthesis of known monomers -new monomers (must show evidence for polymerization, e.g. polycondensation, sequential combination, oxidative coupling, radiation, plasma polymerization) -functional prepolymers of various architectures such as hyperbranched polymers, telechelic polymers, macromonomers, or dendrimers -new polymeric materials with biomedical applications