Spatio-temporal dynamics in a train of rising bubbles

K. Nguyen , C.S. Daw , P. Chakka , M. Cheng , D.D. Bruns , C.E.A. Finney , M.B. Kennell
{"title":"Spatio-temporal dynamics in a train of rising bubbles","authors":"K. Nguyen ,&nbsp;C.S. Daw ,&nbsp;P. Chakka ,&nbsp;M. Cheng ,&nbsp;D.D. Bruns ,&nbsp;C.E.A. Finney ,&nbsp;M.B. Kennell","doi":"10.1016/S0923-0467(96)03126-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It has been suggested that rising bubbles in dense fluids resemble an inverted dripping faucet and that they undergo analogues period-doubling bifurcations to chaos. We present experimental results that demonstrate that this analogy is weak because the dominant source of instability in the bubble train is inherently different — mutual interactions between spatially separated bubbles as opposed to nozzle dynamics. Unlike the dripping faucet, the initial instability in a bubble train develops at a location far from the injection nozzle and progresses toward the nozzle with increasing gas flow. From qualitative and rigorous quantitative observations, we conclude that rising-bubble dynamics are best described as ‘small-box spatio-temporal chaos’ with a flow instability. Such dynamics can superficially appear to be simple temporal chaos when considering spatially localized measurements. We show similarity between our experimental results and a bubble-interaction model that accounts for drag and coalescence effects without considering any nozzle dynamics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101226,"journal":{"name":"The Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal","volume":"64 1","pages":"Pages 191-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0923-0467(96)03126-0","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Chemical Engineering Journal and the Biochemical Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923046796031260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

It has been suggested that rising bubbles in dense fluids resemble an inverted dripping faucet and that they undergo analogues period-doubling bifurcations to chaos. We present experimental results that demonstrate that this analogy is weak because the dominant source of instability in the bubble train is inherently different — mutual interactions between spatially separated bubbles as opposed to nozzle dynamics. Unlike the dripping faucet, the initial instability in a bubble train develops at a location far from the injection nozzle and progresses toward the nozzle with increasing gas flow. From qualitative and rigorous quantitative observations, we conclude that rising-bubble dynamics are best described as ‘small-box spatio-temporal chaos’ with a flow instability. Such dynamics can superficially appear to be simple temporal chaos when considering spatially localized measurements. We show similarity between our experimental results and a bubble-interaction model that accounts for drag and coalescence effects without considering any nozzle dynamics.

一列上升气泡的时空动力学
有人认为,稠密流体中上升的气泡类似于一个倒置的滴水龙头,它们经历了类似于混沌的周期加倍分岔。我们提出的实验结果表明,这种类比是弱的,因为气泡列中不稳定的主要来源本质上是不同的——空间分离的气泡之间的相互作用,而不是喷嘴动力学。与滴水龙头不同的是,气泡列车的初始不稳定发生在远离喷嘴的位置,并随着气体流量的增加向喷嘴方向发展。从定性和严格的定量观察中,我们得出结论,气泡上升动力学最好被描述为具有流动不稳定性的“小盒时空混沌”。当考虑空间局域测量时,这种动力学表面上看起来是简单的时间混沌。我们展示了我们的实验结果和气泡相互作用模型之间的相似性,该模型在不考虑任何喷嘴动力学的情况下考虑了阻力和聚并效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信