Implementing a Produce Prescription Program at Three Federally Qualified Health Centers to Help Patients Manage Their Diabetes or Prediabetes: A Qualitative Assessment of Clinic Staff Experiences in Los Angeles County, California, USA

IF 2.4 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Victoria Ayala, Julia I. Caldwell, Fatinah Darwish-Elsherbiny, Dipa Shah, T. Kuo
{"title":"Implementing a Produce Prescription Program at Three Federally Qualified Health Centers to Help Patients Manage Their Diabetes or Prediabetes: A Qualitative Assessment of Clinic Staff Experiences in Los Angeles County, California, USA","authors":"Victoria Ayala, Julia I. Caldwell, Fatinah Darwish-Elsherbiny, Dipa Shah, T. Kuo","doi":"10.3390/diabetology4030025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through a partnership with three Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), the local health department in Los Angeles County implemented a produce prescription program (PPR) to increase fresh fruit and vegetable purchases among patients with diabetes or prediabetes. The PPR, which began in 2020, provided eligible patients with a USD 40 voucher every month for 6 months to promote the purchase of fresh produce at large-chain grocery stores. To address gaps in current practice and program delivery, this qualitative assessment describes staff experiences with the PPR, documenting the facilitators and barriers they encountered while implementing the program. Fifteen clinic staff (i.e., PPR implementers) were interviewed for this assessment. Thematic analysis and coding were conducted using the ATLAS.ti software; the coding was carried out by two separate coders. Interviewees discussed the importance of having preexisting partnerships and programs to support the PPR at their clinic site. Hidden costs related to implementing the program included a large and unexpected amount of staff time devoted to enrolling patients into the program. Collecting quality data and having limited expertise to rigorously evaluate the program were other challenges. Because patients often share their food with their family, the monthly USD 40 incentive was generally not enough to support their needs; interviewees suggested giving a higher inventive amount to those with a larger household. Future PPR efforts and similar food incentive programs should consider these and other facilitators and barriers to implementation and sustainability, especially when making adjustments to these programs to improve services and access to food resources.","PeriodicalId":72798,"journal":{"name":"Diabetology","volume":"166 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology4030025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Through a partnership with three Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), the local health department in Los Angeles County implemented a produce prescription program (PPR) to increase fresh fruit and vegetable purchases among patients with diabetes or prediabetes. The PPR, which began in 2020, provided eligible patients with a USD 40 voucher every month for 6 months to promote the purchase of fresh produce at large-chain grocery stores. To address gaps in current practice and program delivery, this qualitative assessment describes staff experiences with the PPR, documenting the facilitators and barriers they encountered while implementing the program. Fifteen clinic staff (i.e., PPR implementers) were interviewed for this assessment. Thematic analysis and coding were conducted using the ATLAS.ti software; the coding was carried out by two separate coders. Interviewees discussed the importance of having preexisting partnerships and programs to support the PPR at their clinic site. Hidden costs related to implementing the program included a large and unexpected amount of staff time devoted to enrolling patients into the program. Collecting quality data and having limited expertise to rigorously evaluate the program were other challenges. Because patients often share their food with their family, the monthly USD 40 incentive was generally not enough to support their needs; interviewees suggested giving a higher inventive amount to those with a larger household. Future PPR efforts and similar food incentive programs should consider these and other facilitators and barriers to implementation and sustainability, especially when making adjustments to these programs to improve services and access to food resources.
在三家联邦认证的健康中心实施生产处方计划,帮助患者管理糖尿病或前驱糖尿病:对美国加州洛杉矶县诊所工作人员经验的定性评估
通过与三家联邦合格健康中心(FQHCs)的合作,洛杉矶县当地卫生部门实施了一项农产品处方计划(PPR),以增加糖尿病或前驱糖尿病患者购买新鲜水果和蔬菜。PPR于2020年启动,在6个月内每月向符合条件的患者提供40美元的代金券,以促进在大型连锁杂货店购买新鲜农产品。为了解决当前实践和项目交付中的差距,这一定性评估描述了工作人员在实施项目复核方面的经验,记录了他们在实施项目时遇到的促进因素和障碍。本次评估采访了15名临床工作人员(即小反刍兽疫实施者)。利用ATLAS进行专题分析和编码。ti软件;编码是由两个独立的编码员完成的。受访者讨论了在他们的诊所拥有预先存在的伙伴关系和支持小反刍兽疫的计划的重要性。与实施该计划相关的隐性成本包括大量意想不到的工作人员用于将患者纳入该计划的时间。收集高质量数据和拥有有限的专业知识来严格评估项目是其他挑战。由于患者经常与家人分享食物,每月40美元的奖励通常不足以满足他们的需求;受访者建议给家庭成员较多的人更多的创造性奖励。未来的小反刍兽疫工作和类似的粮食激励计划应考虑到这些因素和其他阻碍实施和可持续性的因素和障碍,特别是在调整这些计划以改善服务和获取粮食资源时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信