Lost dignity: predominant experience of old age by the elderly

L. Sadeghmoghadam, M. Foroughan, F. Shahboulaghi, F. Ahmadi, A. Farhadi, Shima Nazari, Masoumeh Amiri Delui
{"title":"Lost dignity: predominant experience of old age by the elderly","authors":"L. Sadeghmoghadam, M. Foroughan, F. Shahboulaghi, F. Ahmadi, A. Farhadi, Shima Nazari, Masoumeh Amiri Delui","doi":"10.29252/jrh.9.5.381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paying attention to the views of the elderly and identifying their understanding of old age can be great help for proper consideration about their needs and problems. The purpose of this study was to understand the predominant experience of elderly people of aging. Hermeneutics phenomenology was used to collect data, and the van Manen's method was implemented to analyze those data. The required data was collected by having 10 deep semi-structured interviews with the elderly from Tehran, Mashhad and Gonabad– cities, Iran, and then was analyzed for the explanation of the notion of old-age.Three views that were extracted aging agony, lost independence and marginalization. These can reflect the negative viewpoints of the elderly about the aging phenomenon. The elderly’s aging description can provide experts and employees in various sanitary, training and social departments with invaluable data in order to decrease the current problems facing the elderly to plan for their future and better communicate with them, and finally enhance the available knowledge about elderly and their quality of life.","PeriodicalId":14122,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Research and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/jrh.9.5.381","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Paying attention to the views of the elderly and identifying their understanding of old age can be great help for proper consideration about their needs and problems. The purpose of this study was to understand the predominant experience of elderly people of aging. Hermeneutics phenomenology was used to collect data, and the van Manen's method was implemented to analyze those data. The required data was collected by having 10 deep semi-structured interviews with the elderly from Tehran, Mashhad and Gonabad– cities, Iran, and then was analyzed for the explanation of the notion of old-age.Three views that were extracted aging agony, lost independence and marginalization. These can reflect the negative viewpoints of the elderly about the aging phenomenon. The elderly’s aging description can provide experts and employees in various sanitary, training and social departments with invaluable data in order to decrease the current problems facing the elderly to plan for their future and better communicate with them, and finally enhance the available knowledge about elderly and their quality of life.
失去尊严:老年人对老年的主要体验
关注老年人的观点,了解他们对老年的理解,对正确考虑他们的需求和问题有很大的帮助。本研究的目的是了解老年人的主要经验老化。采用解释学、现象学等方法收集数据,并运用范曼南方法对数据进行分析。通过对伊朗德黑兰、马什哈德和戈纳巴德等城市的老年人进行10次深度半结构化访谈,收集所需数据,然后对老年概念的解释进行分析。三种观点分别是衰老的痛苦、失去的独立和被边缘化。这些可以反映出老年人对老龄化现象的负面看法。老年人的老龄化描述可以为各个卫生、培训和社会部门的专家和工作人员提供宝贵的数据,以减少老年人目前面临的问题,规划他们的未来,更好地与他们沟通,最终提高老年人的知识和他们的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信