Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning (PBL) on Mathematics Learning Achievement in terms of Student Adversity Quotient (AQ)

R. Lusiana, E. Suprapto, Ika Sukristini
{"title":"Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning (PBL) on Mathematics Learning Achievement in terms of Student Adversity Quotient (AQ)","authors":"R. Lusiana, E. Suprapto, Ika Sukristini","doi":"10.22437/edumatica.v11i02.7670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Innovative learning models have an influence on student achievement. This study aims to determine whether the PBL learning model is more effective than the STAD learning model (learning model that has been applied in schools) on mathematics learning achievement, whether there is a difference in the effect of the AQ of climber, camper, and quitter category students on mathematics learning achievement, and whether there is the interaction between the learning model and students' AQ on mathematics learning achievement. This research is in the form of quantitative research. The sample was taken using a simple random sampling technique where the experimental class was taught using the PBL learning model and the control class was taught using the STAD learning model. The data collection technique used the Questionnaire method for AQ data and the test method for students' mathematics learning achievement data. The data technique used a two-way unequal cell analysis of variance test with a 2×3 matrix and a further test using the Scheffe test. The results of hypothesis testing with a significance level (α) = 5% indicate that there is a difference in the effect of the learning model on mathematics learning achievement (Fobs=19.97 and Fα=4.13), there are differences in the effect of each AQ category on mathematics learning achievement (Fobs=94.59 and Fα=3.28), and there is no interaction between the learning model and students' AQ on mathematics learning achievement (Fobs=2.39 and Fα=3.28).","PeriodicalId":33561,"journal":{"name":"Edumatica Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edumatica Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v11i02.7670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Innovative learning models have an influence on student achievement. This study aims to determine whether the PBL learning model is more effective than the STAD learning model (learning model that has been applied in schools) on mathematics learning achievement, whether there is a difference in the effect of the AQ of climber, camper, and quitter category students on mathematics learning achievement, and whether there is the interaction between the learning model and students' AQ on mathematics learning achievement. This research is in the form of quantitative research. The sample was taken using a simple random sampling technique where the experimental class was taught using the PBL learning model and the control class was taught using the STAD learning model. The data collection technique used the Questionnaire method for AQ data and the test method for students' mathematics learning achievement data. The data technique used a two-way unequal cell analysis of variance test with a 2×3 matrix and a further test using the Scheffe test. The results of hypothesis testing with a significance level (α) = 5% indicate that there is a difference in the effect of the learning model on mathematics learning achievement (Fobs=19.97 and Fα=4.13), there are differences in the effect of each AQ category on mathematics learning achievement (Fobs=94.59 and Fα=3.28), and there is no interaction between the learning model and students' AQ on mathematics learning achievement (Fobs=2.39 and Fα=3.28).
基于问题的学习(PBL)对学生逆境商(AQ)数学学习成绩的影响
创新学习模式对学生的学习成绩有影响。本研究旨在确定PBL学习模式是否比STAD学习模式(已在学校应用的学习模式)对数学学习成果更有效,攀岩类、露营类和放弃类学生的AQ对数学学习成果的影响是否存在差异,学习模式与学生的AQ对数学学习成果的影响是否存在交互作用。本研究采用定量研究的形式。样本采用简单的随机抽样技术,实验组采用PBL学习模式,对照组采用STAD学习模式。在数据收集技术上,对学生数学学习成绩数据采用问卷调查法,对学生数学学习成绩数据采用测试法。数据技术使用2×3矩阵的双向不等单元分析方差检验和使用Scheffe检验的进一步检验。假设检验(α) = 5%的显著性水平表明,学习模式对数学学习成就的影响存在差异(Fobs=19.97, Fα=4.13),各AQ类别对数学学习成就的影响存在差异(Fobs=94.59, Fα=3.28),学习模式与学生的AQ对数学学习成就的影响不存在交互作用(Fobs=2.39, Fα=3.28)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信