Parisa Sedaghti Sedaghti, Gita Asgharzadeh, H. Zarei
{"title":"Functional Balance Tests for Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Review Study","authors":"Parisa Sedaghti Sedaghti, Gita Asgharzadeh, H. Zarei","doi":"10.32598/cjns.8.30.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Knowledge of the functional balance tests for the patients with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) may provide useful and accurate information about the balance function of these patients under different situations. Objectives: This study aims to review the functional balance tests for PwMS. Materials and Methods: This is a systematic review. The search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, PEDro, and Google Scholar databases on relevant studies published until November 2021. Results: Twenty-five articles and 25 different tests were found to evaluate the functional balance of PwMS. It was found that the studies used 6 tests to assess the static balance, 13 tests to assess dynamic balance, and 6 multi-item tests to assess functional balance in PwMS. Single-leg stance test, balance error scoring system test and steady stance test is a test battery for static balance; six-spot step test, timed up and go test, and figure-of-8 hop test are better for dynamic balance, and the balance evaluation systems test is a better multiitem test to assess the balance of PwMS by examining the postural control components. Conclusion: Single-limb standing test, balance error scoring system (BESS) test and steady stance test provide accurate data on static balance; six spot step test, Timed Get up and go test and figure-of-8 hop test provide valuable data on the dynamic balance and Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a valid test to assess the balance of PwMS from the perspective of the review of posture control components.","PeriodicalId":31302,"journal":{"name":"Caspian Journal of Neurological Sciences","volume":"135 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caspian Journal of Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/cjns.8.30.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Knowledge of the functional balance tests for the patients with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) may provide useful and accurate information about the balance function of these patients under different situations. Objectives: This study aims to review the functional balance tests for PwMS. Materials and Methods: This is a systematic review. The search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, PEDro, and Google Scholar databases on relevant studies published until November 2021. Results: Twenty-five articles and 25 different tests were found to evaluate the functional balance of PwMS. It was found that the studies used 6 tests to assess the static balance, 13 tests to assess dynamic balance, and 6 multi-item tests to assess functional balance in PwMS. Single-leg stance test, balance error scoring system test and steady stance test is a test battery for static balance; six-spot step test, timed up and go test, and figure-of-8 hop test are better for dynamic balance, and the balance evaluation systems test is a better multiitem test to assess the balance of PwMS by examining the postural control components. Conclusion: Single-limb standing test, balance error scoring system (BESS) test and steady stance test provide accurate data on static balance; six spot step test, Timed Get up and go test and figure-of-8 hop test provide valuable data on the dynamic balance and Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) is a valid test to assess the balance of PwMS from the perspective of the review of posture control components.
背景:了解多发性硬化症(PwMS)患者的功能平衡测试可以为这些患者在不同情况下的平衡功能提供有用和准确的信息。目的:本研究的目的是回顾功能平衡测试的PwMS。材料与方法:这是一篇系统综述。检索PubMed、Scopus、LILACS、CINAHL、CENTRAL、Web of Science、PEDro和Google Scholar数据库,检索截止到2021年11月发表的相关研究。结果:找到25篇文献和25种不同的测试来评估PwMS的功能平衡。研究发现,这些研究使用了6项测试来评估PwMS的静态平衡,13项测试来评估动态平衡,6项多项目测试来评估功能平衡。单腿站立测试、平衡误差计分系统测试和稳站测试是静平衡的测试电池;6点步测试、定时上走测试和8字跳测试是动态平衡测试的较好方法,平衡评价系统测试是通过检查姿势控制成分来评估PwMS平衡的较好的多项目测试。结论:单肢站立试验、平衡误差评分系统(BESS)试验和稳定站立试验提供了准确的静平衡数据;6点步测试、定时起身和起跳测试和8字跳测试为动态平衡提供了有价值的数据,平衡评估系统测试(BESTest)是从姿势控制组件审查的角度评估PwMS平衡的有效测试。