P474 The value of PCR-based azole resistance detection in invasive aspergillosis: A prospective multicenter study

IF 1.4 Q4 MYCOLOGY
S. Huygens, A. Dunbar, Jochem Buijl, J. Maertens, P. Verweij, C. Klaassen, K. Lagrou, K. van Dijk, T. Mercier, A. Schauwvlieghe, B. Rijnders
{"title":"P474 The value of PCR-based azole resistance detection in invasive aspergillosis: A prospective multicenter study","authors":"S. Huygens, A. Dunbar, Jochem Buijl, J. Maertens, P. Verweij, C. Klaassen, K. Lagrou, K. van Dijk, T. Mercier, A. Schauwvlieghe, B. Rijnders","doi":"10.1093/mmy/myac072.P474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Poster session 1, September 21, 2022, 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM Objectives Prompt detection of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus will result in the timely start of active treatment and may improve the survival of invasive aspergillosis (IA). The use of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting Aspergillus species and fumigatus DNA as well as the two most prevalent azole resistance- associated mutations (RAMs) in the cyp51A gen (TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A) could shorten the time to detect azole-resistant IA. Methods In a prospective study in 12 Dutch and Belgian centers, we evaluated the clinical value of the multiplex AsperGenius®PCR in hematology patients with a pulmonary infiltrate undergoing bronchoalveolar lavage (BALf) sampling. The primary endpoint was antifungal treatment failure in the 6 weeks after antifungal treatment initiation in the patients in which azole-resistant IA was detected. Treatment failure was defined as death or a switch to an antifungal agent from another class after at least 5 days of first-line therapy. Patients with a mixed azole-susceptible/resistant infection were excluded from this analysis to ascertain that the infection was indeed caused by the resistant strain. Results Of 323 patients enrolled, sufficient BALf for PCR testing remained in 299. Probable fungal disease was diagnosed in 95 (34%), Aspergillus cultured in 24 (8%), Aspergillus DNA detected in 118 (39%), and A. fumigatus DNA in 88 (29%) patients. The resistance PCR was conclusive in 54/88 (61%) and RAMs were detected in 8 (15%), Table 1. All 8 had probable IA but 2 had a mixed infection and were excluded. In the 6 remaining patients, treatment failure was observed in one. Compared with the GM negative patients and despite antifungal therapy, a positive GM test was associated with a 13% higher 6-week overall mortality (P = .01), Table 2. Surprisingly, the 6-week mortality in the 65 patients who had a positive Aspergillus PCR but a negative GM and culture was not increased compared to those with a negative PCR (PCR + 14% vs. PCR- 16% mortality, P = .68). Conclusions In patients with an underlying hematological disease and a pulmonary infiltrate, the detection of Aspergillus DNA by PCR on BALf was not associated with increased mortality. The exact place of the Aspergillus PCR in the EORTC-MSGERC invasive fungal infection criteria is therefore uncertain. In 15% of the patients in whom A. fumigatus DNA was present, azole RAMs were detected by PCR. In only 1/6 probable cases of IA with RAMs detected, antifungal treatment failure was observed. Basing the choice of antifungal therapy on the result of a cyp51a resistance PCR may help to reduce the impact of azole resistance on mortality.","PeriodicalId":18325,"journal":{"name":"Medical mycology journal","volume":"256 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical mycology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myac072.P474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Poster session 1, September 21, 2022, 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM Objectives Prompt detection of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus will result in the timely start of active treatment and may improve the survival of invasive aspergillosis (IA). The use of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting Aspergillus species and fumigatus DNA as well as the two most prevalent azole resistance- associated mutations (RAMs) in the cyp51A gen (TR34/L98H and TR46/Y121F/T289A) could shorten the time to detect azole-resistant IA. Methods In a prospective study in 12 Dutch and Belgian centers, we evaluated the clinical value of the multiplex AsperGenius®PCR in hematology patients with a pulmonary infiltrate undergoing bronchoalveolar lavage (BALf) sampling. The primary endpoint was antifungal treatment failure in the 6 weeks after antifungal treatment initiation in the patients in which azole-resistant IA was detected. Treatment failure was defined as death or a switch to an antifungal agent from another class after at least 5 days of first-line therapy. Patients with a mixed azole-susceptible/resistant infection were excluded from this analysis to ascertain that the infection was indeed caused by the resistant strain. Results Of 323 patients enrolled, sufficient BALf for PCR testing remained in 299. Probable fungal disease was diagnosed in 95 (34%), Aspergillus cultured in 24 (8%), Aspergillus DNA detected in 118 (39%), and A. fumigatus DNA in 88 (29%) patients. The resistance PCR was conclusive in 54/88 (61%) and RAMs were detected in 8 (15%), Table 1. All 8 had probable IA but 2 had a mixed infection and were excluded. In the 6 remaining patients, treatment failure was observed in one. Compared with the GM negative patients and despite antifungal therapy, a positive GM test was associated with a 13% higher 6-week overall mortality (P = .01), Table 2. Surprisingly, the 6-week mortality in the 65 patients who had a positive Aspergillus PCR but a negative GM and culture was not increased compared to those with a negative PCR (PCR + 14% vs. PCR- 16% mortality, P = .68). Conclusions In patients with an underlying hematological disease and a pulmonary infiltrate, the detection of Aspergillus DNA by PCR on BALf was not associated with increased mortality. The exact place of the Aspergillus PCR in the EORTC-MSGERC invasive fungal infection criteria is therefore uncertain. In 15% of the patients in whom A. fumigatus DNA was present, azole RAMs were detected by PCR. In only 1/6 probable cases of IA with RAMs detected, antifungal treatment failure was observed. Basing the choice of antifungal therapy on the result of a cyp51a resistance PCR may help to reduce the impact of azole resistance on mortality.
基于pcr的唑耐药性检测在侵袭性曲霉病中的价值:一项前瞻性多中心研究
摘要:海报会议1,2022年9月21日,下午12:30 - 1:30目的及时发现耐唑烟曲霉将导致及时开始积极治疗,并可能提高侵袭性曲霉病(IA)的生存率。利用多重聚合酶链反应(PCR)靶向曲霉和烟曲霉的DNA,以及cyp51A基因中最常见的两种抗唑相关突变(TR34/L98H和TR46/Y121F/T289A),可以缩短检测抗唑IA的时间。方法在荷兰和比利时的12个研究中心进行的一项前瞻性研究中,我们评估了多重AsperGenius®PCR在接受支气管肺泡灌洗(BALf)取样的血液学患者肺浸润中的临床价值。主要终点是在开始抗真菌治疗后6周内检测到耐唑IA的患者的抗真菌治疗失败。治疗失败的定义是在一线治疗至少5天后死亡或从另一类抗真菌药物切换到另一类抗真菌药物。混合唑敏感/耐药感染的患者被排除在分析之外,以确定感染确实是由耐药菌株引起的。结果在323例入组患者中,299例仍有足够的半衰期用于PCR检测。诊断为真菌病95例(34%),培养曲霉24例(8%),检测到曲霉DNA 118例(39%),烟曲霉DNA 88例(29%)。88株中有54株(61%)的耐药PCR结果确定,8株(15%)检测到RAMs,见表1。8例均有可能感染IA, 2例为混合性感染,排除在外。其余6例患者中,1例治疗失败。与GM阴性患者相比,尽管进行了抗真菌治疗,但GM阳性患者6周总死亡率高出13% (P = 0.01),表2。令人惊讶的是,65例曲霉PCR阳性但GM和培养阴性的患者的6周死亡率与PCR阴性的患者相比没有增加(PCR + 14% vs PCR- 16%死亡率,P = 0.68)。结论:在有潜在血液病和肺浸润的患者中,用PCR检测BALf上的曲霉DNA与死亡率增加无关。因此,曲霉PCR在EORTC-MSGERC侵袭性真菌感染标准中的确切位置是不确定的。在15%的烟曲霉DNA检出的患者中,用PCR检测到唑类拉姆斯菌。在检出RAMs的IA疑似病例中,仅1/6出现抗真菌治疗失败。根据cyp51a耐药PCR结果选择抗真菌治疗可能有助于减少唑耐药对死亡率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical mycology journal
Medical mycology journal Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Medical Mycology Journal is published by and is the official organ of the Japanese Society for Medical Mycology. The Journal publishes original papers, reviews, and brief reports on topics related to medical and veterinary mycology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信