Insulin Resistance in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Its Association With Anthropometric Fetal Indices

IF 2.7 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Tuan Dinh Le, Tien Minh Bui, Trinh Hien Vu, Nga Phi Thi Nguyen, Hoa Thanh Thi Tran, S. T. Nguyen, Lan Ho Thi Nguyen, Manh Van Ngo, Hoang Huy Duong, Binh Thanh Vu, H. Dinh, Binh Nhu Do, Duc-Cuong Le, Hien Thi Nguyen, Kien Trung Nguyen
{"title":"Insulin Resistance in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Its Association With Anthropometric Fetal Indices","authors":"Tuan Dinh Le, Tien Minh Bui, Trinh Hien Vu, Nga Phi Thi Nguyen, Hoa Thanh Thi Tran, S. T. Nguyen, Lan Ho Thi Nguyen, Manh Van Ngo, Hoang Huy Duong, Binh Thanh Vu, H. Dinh, Binh Nhu Do, Duc-Cuong Le, Hien Thi Nguyen, Kien Trung Nguyen","doi":"10.1177/11795514221098403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), insulin resistance (IR) increases the risk of developing manifest type 2 diabetes mellitus and is associated with complications in both mother and fetus. Objectives: This research aimed to evaluate the associations between IR evaluated by 3 indices (namely updated homeostasis model assessment model (HOMA2), QUICKI, and McAuley’s index) and the diabetes risk factors and the fetal growth indices in Vietnamese women with GDM. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 370 women with GDM and 40 healthy pregnant women from January 2015 to May 2019. IR was calculated by HOMA2 (HOMA2-IR), QUICKI, and McAuley’s index. Fetal anthropometric measurements were assessed via ultrasound which was performed and interpreted by ultrasound experts. Results: In the simple regression analysis, McAuley’s index illustrated had statistically significant correlations to the highest number of risk factors of diabetes mellitus compared with HOMA2-IR and QUICKI indices. Moreover, McAuley’s index correlated statistically significantly to the highest number of fetal ultrasound measurements factors such as including biparietal diameter (BPD) (r = −0.271, P < .001), head circumference (HC) (r = −0.225, P < .001), abdominal circumference (AC) (r = −0.214, P < .001), femur length (FL) (r = −0.231, P < .001), estimated fetal weight (EFW) (r = −0.239, P < .001) and fetal estimated age (r = −0.299, P < .001). In the multivariable analysis, the McAuley’s index contributed the greatest to AC (Standardized B of −0.656, P < .001). Conclusion: The McAuley’s index was significantly associated with a higher number of more risk factors for diabetes mellitus as well as fetal ultrasound sonography findings measurements than compared with HOMA2-IR and QUICKI indices.","PeriodicalId":44715,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795514221098403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: In pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), insulin resistance (IR) increases the risk of developing manifest type 2 diabetes mellitus and is associated with complications in both mother and fetus. Objectives: This research aimed to evaluate the associations between IR evaluated by 3 indices (namely updated homeostasis model assessment model (HOMA2), QUICKI, and McAuley’s index) and the diabetes risk factors and the fetal growth indices in Vietnamese women with GDM. Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 370 women with GDM and 40 healthy pregnant women from January 2015 to May 2019. IR was calculated by HOMA2 (HOMA2-IR), QUICKI, and McAuley’s index. Fetal anthropometric measurements were assessed via ultrasound which was performed and interpreted by ultrasound experts. Results: In the simple regression analysis, McAuley’s index illustrated had statistically significant correlations to the highest number of risk factors of diabetes mellitus compared with HOMA2-IR and QUICKI indices. Moreover, McAuley’s index correlated statistically significantly to the highest number of fetal ultrasound measurements factors such as including biparietal diameter (BPD) (r = −0.271, P < .001), head circumference (HC) (r = −0.225, P < .001), abdominal circumference (AC) (r = −0.214, P < .001), femur length (FL) (r = −0.231, P < .001), estimated fetal weight (EFW) (r = −0.239, P < .001) and fetal estimated age (r = −0.299, P < .001). In the multivariable analysis, the McAuley’s index contributed the greatest to AC (Standardized B of −0.656, P < .001). Conclusion: The McAuley’s index was significantly associated with a higher number of more risk factors for diabetes mellitus as well as fetal ultrasound sonography findings measurements than compared with HOMA2-IR and QUICKI indices.
妊娠期糖尿病胰岛素抵抗及其与胎儿人体测量指标的关系
背景:在妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)的孕妇中,胰岛素抵抗(IR)增加了发生显性2型糖尿病的风险,并与母亲和胎儿的并发症相关。目的:本研究旨在评价更新的体内平衡模型评估模型(HOMA2)、QUICKI和McAuley指数3个指标评价的IR与越南GDM妇女糖尿病危险因素和胎儿生长指标的相关性。方法:对2015年1月至2019年5月期间370名GDM女性和40名健康孕妇进行横断面描述性研究。IR采用HOMA2 (HOMA2-IR)、QUICKI、McAuley指数计算。胎儿的人体测量测量通过超声进行评估,并由超声专家进行解释。结果:在简单回归分析中,与HOMA2-IR和QUICKI指数相比,McAuley指数与糖尿病最高危险因素数有统计学意义。此外,McAuley指数与胎儿超声测量的最高次数相关,包括双顶直径(BPD) (r = - 0.271, P < 0.001)、头围(r = - 0.225, P < 0.001)、腹围(AC) (r = - 0.214, P < 0.001)、股骨长度(FL) (r = - 0.231, P < 0.001)、胎儿体重(EFW) (r = - 0.239, P < 0.001)和胎儿年龄(r = - 0.299, P < 0.001)。在多变量分析中,McAuley 's指数对AC的贡献最大(标准化B值为- 0.656,P < 0.001)。结论:与HOMA2-IR和QUICKI指数相比,McAuley指数与糖尿病的危险因素数量和胎儿超声检查结果有显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信