D. M. McInnes, D. Kampbell
{"title":"The bubble stripping method for determining dissolved hydrogen (H2) in well water","authors":"D. M. McInnes, D. Kampbell","doi":"10.1002/1520-6521(2000)4:6<283::AID-FACT40>3.0.CO;2-V","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The bubble stripping method was developed for use at field sites to measure the concentration of dissolved hydrogen (H2) in ground water. This information is useful in assessing the viability of employing monitored natural attenuation (MNA) as a strategy to influence the restoration of sites contaminated with chlorinated solvents. In laboratory studies, a reservoir containing water was employed to simulate a well. The system was constructed so that the concentration of dissolved H2 could be maintained at a constant level. The method was applied by pumping water from the reservoir into a sample cell, and then injecting 20 ml of nitrogen into the cell to produce a headspace (the “bubble”). Stripping was accomplished by pumping water through the cell, which produced agitation between the aqueous phase and the headspace. Pumping was continued for a length of time sufficient for dissolved H2 to partition between the two phases. Analysis of H2 in the headspace by gas chromatography enabled the concentration of dissolved H2 in solution to be calculated with the use of Henry's law. Two sample cell designs were compared in this study, the Microseeps Cell and the Chapelle Cell. Kinetics of equilibration studies were conducted with each cell, employing solution flow rates of 200, 300, and 400 ml/min, at 4 and 21 °C. The Microseeps Cell compared favorably with the Chapelle Cell with regards to kinetics of equilibration, with the added benefit of costing significantly less. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Field Analyt Chem Technol 4: 283–296, 2000","PeriodicalId":12132,"journal":{"name":"Field Analytical Chemistry and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Field Analytical Chemistry and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6521(2000)4:6<283::AID-FACT40>3.0.CO;2-V","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
测定井水中溶解氢(H2)的气泡溶出法
开发了一种用于野外测量地下水中溶解氢(H2)浓度的气泡剥离法。这一信息有助于评估采用监测的自然衰减(MNA)作为影响受氯化溶剂污染场地恢复的战略的可行性。在实验室研究中,用一个含水的储层来模拟一口井。该体系的构建使溶解H2的浓度保持在恒定水平。该方法的应用是通过将水从储存池中泵入样品细胞,然后向细胞中注入20毫升氮气以产生顶空(“气泡”)。汽提是通过泵送水通过细胞来完成的,这在水相和顶空之间产生了搅拌。泵送持续足够长的时间,使溶解的H2在两相之间分配。气相色谱法分析顶空H2,利用亨利定律计算溶液中溶解H2的浓度。本研究比较了Microseeps细胞和Chapelle细胞两种样品设计。在4°C和21°C下,采用200、300和400 ml/min的溶液流速对每个细胞进行平衡动力学研究。与Chapelle细胞相比,Microseeps细胞在平衡动力学方面具有优势,并且成本显著降低。©2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc化学工程学报(自然科学版),2009,31 (4):393 - 396
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。