Shipping Document Digitization Prospects

A. Y. Churilov
{"title":"Shipping Document Digitization Prospects","authors":"A. Y. Churilov","doi":"10.18572/1812-3929-2021-2-10-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of digital rights as objects of civil rights has given rise to the necessity of studying the possibility of the existence of digital documents of title. In the paper, the author compared documents of title as commercial securities and digital rights, in particular, utilitarian ones. The author made a conclusion that it is not possible to recognize the utilitarian digital law as a negotiable document of title, and its transfer — the transfer of an item within the meaning of Art. 224 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.","PeriodicalId":81750,"journal":{"name":"Jurist (Washington, D.C.)","volume":"105 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurist (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3929-2021-2-10-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of digital rights as objects of civil rights has given rise to the necessity of studying the possibility of the existence of digital documents of title. In the paper, the author compared documents of title as commercial securities and digital rights, in particular, utilitarian ones. The author made a conclusion that it is not possible to recognize the utilitarian digital law as a negotiable document of title, and its transfer — the transfer of an item within the meaning of Art. 224 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.
航运单据数字化展望
数字权利作为民事权利客体的出现,产生了研究数字物权凭证存在可能性的必要性。本文比较了作为商业证券的所有权凭证与数字权利,特别是功利主义的所有权凭证。笔者认为,不能将实用型数字法认定为一种可转让的所有权凭证,也不能认定其转让——即俄罗斯联邦民法典第224条意义上的物项转让。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信