Elementary Science Teachers’ Understanding of Inquiry-Based Teaching and Self-Evaluation of their Practices: A Case Study from Thailand

Q3 Social Sciences
Jannapha Soonjan, K. Kaewkhong
{"title":"Elementary Science Teachers’ Understanding of Inquiry-Based Teaching and Self-Evaluation of their Practices: A Case Study from Thailand","authors":"Jannapha Soonjan, K. Kaewkhong","doi":"10.30722/ijisme.30.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research explores Thai elementary science teachers’ understanding of inquiry-based teaching based on self-evaluation, and focusing on the frequency of their use of inquiry-based strategies in a class. We developed 18 open-ended questions on teaching scenarios based on the essential features of inquiry teaching to assess 38 Thai elementary science teachers’ understanding of inquiry-based teaching. The 14 items of the Inquiry Strategies Scale (IS) were used to measure the frequency of using inquiry-based teaching strategies in a lesson delivered by each of the study participants. The results reveal that these Thai science teachers lack knowledge and have some fundamental misunderstandings about inquiry-based science teaching. Interestingly, the frequency with which they used inquiry-based strategies in science teaching was almost the same as non-inquiry-based strategies and was not related to their knowledge. Specific scaffolding is needed to help the teachers gain a better understanding of inquiry-based science teaching.","PeriodicalId":39044,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30722/ijisme.30.01.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research explores Thai elementary science teachers’ understanding of inquiry-based teaching based on self-evaluation, and focusing on the frequency of their use of inquiry-based strategies in a class. We developed 18 open-ended questions on teaching scenarios based on the essential features of inquiry teaching to assess 38 Thai elementary science teachers’ understanding of inquiry-based teaching. The 14 items of the Inquiry Strategies Scale (IS) were used to measure the frequency of using inquiry-based teaching strategies in a lesson delivered by each of the study participants. The results reveal that these Thai science teachers lack knowledge and have some fundamental misunderstandings about inquiry-based science teaching. Interestingly, the frequency with which they used inquiry-based strategies in science teaching was almost the same as non-inquiry-based strategies and was not related to their knowledge. Specific scaffolding is needed to help the teachers gain a better understanding of inquiry-based science teaching.
小学科学教师对探究性教学的理解与实践自我评价——以泰国为例
本研究探讨泰国小学科学教师对基于自我评价的探究性教学的理解,并关注他们在课堂上使用探究性策略的频率。基于探究性教学的基本特征,我们开发了18个关于教学情境的开放式问题,以评估38位泰国小学科学教师对探究性教学的理解。探究策略量表(IS)的14个项目被用来衡量每个研究参与者在课堂上使用探究性教学策略的频率。结果表明,这些泰国科学教师对探究性科学教学缺乏认识,存在一些根本性的误解。有趣的是,他们在科学教学中使用探究式策略的频率与非探究式策略几乎相同,并且与他们的知识无关。需要具体的脚手架来帮助教师更好地理解探究性科学教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信