Antibiotic Use in Cesarean Section and Hysterectomy Procedure: Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment

Andika Dwi Mahendra
{"title":"Antibiotic Use in Cesarean Section and Hysterectomy Procedure: Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment","authors":"Andika Dwi Mahendra","doi":"10.32734/idjpcr.v4i2.6235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antibiotic resistance is global issue and the incident is increasing with the use of unwise antibiotic. This study is to describe and evaluate appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis selection on Cesarean Section and Hysterectomy procedure. Purpose of study is to evaluate appropiateness of antibiotic selection on cesarean section and hysterectomy. A retrospective study was performed during September 2016 - January 2017 in Private Hospital, Semarang. Data were analized quantitatively using ATC-DDD methodology. Evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis will be assessed based on The guideline of The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) : Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Gynecologic Procedures and The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) : Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery. Overall, 90 of 95 patients were given antibiotic prophylaxis. The most frequently used antibiotics were ceftriaxone (69.51 DDD/Patient-days) and ceftazidime (14.95 DDD/Patient-days). Appropriate antibiotic selection based on the guidelines for cesarean section procedure was 1.75% and 6.1% for hysterectomy procedure. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis on cesarean section and hysterectomy procedure was very high and less appropriate in the selection. Almost patient received third-generation cephalosporin instead of first-generation cephalosporin such as cefazolin. cefazolin is more effective and narrow spectrum for infection-causing bacteria of these procedures. \n ","PeriodicalId":13466,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32734/idjpcr.v4i2.6235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance is global issue and the incident is increasing with the use of unwise antibiotic. This study is to describe and evaluate appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis selection on Cesarean Section and Hysterectomy procedure. Purpose of study is to evaluate appropiateness of antibiotic selection on cesarean section and hysterectomy. A retrospective study was performed during September 2016 - January 2017 in Private Hospital, Semarang. Data were analized quantitatively using ATC-DDD methodology. Evaluation of antibiotic prophylaxis will be assessed based on The guideline of The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) : Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Gynecologic Procedures and The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) : Clinical Practice Guidelines for Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Surgery. Overall, 90 of 95 patients were given antibiotic prophylaxis. The most frequently used antibiotics were ceftriaxone (69.51 DDD/Patient-days) and ceftazidime (14.95 DDD/Patient-days). Appropriate antibiotic selection based on the guidelines for cesarean section procedure was 1.75% and 6.1% for hysterectomy procedure. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis on cesarean section and hysterectomy procedure was very high and less appropriate in the selection. Almost patient received third-generation cephalosporin instead of first-generation cephalosporin such as cefazolin. cefazolin is more effective and narrow spectrum for infection-causing bacteria of these procedures.  
剖宫产和子宫切除术中抗生素的使用:定性和定量评估
抗生素耐药性是一个全球性问题,随着不明智抗生素的使用,这一事件正在增加。本研究旨在描述和评估剖宫产和子宫切除术手术中抗生素预防选择的适宜性。本研究的目的是评价剖宫产术和子宫切除术中抗生素选择的适宜性。2016年9月至2017年1月在三宝垄私立医院进行了一项回顾性研究。采用ATC-DDD方法对数据进行定量分析。抗生素预防的评估将根据美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)指南:妇科手术的抗生素预防和美国卫生系统药剂师学会(ASHP)指南:手术中抗生素预防的临床实践指南进行评估。总体而言,95名患者中有90名接受了抗生素预防治疗。使用频率最高的抗生素是头孢曲松(69.51 DDD/患者-天)和头孢他啶(14.95 DDD/患者-天)。剖宫产手术和子宫切除手术的抗生素选择率分别为1.75%和6.1%。剖宫产和子宫切除术中抗生素预防的使用率很高,在选择上不太合适。几乎患者使用的是第三代头孢菌素,而不是头孢唑林等第一代头孢菌素。头孢唑林对这些程序中引起感染的细菌更有效且谱窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信